ICI Viewpoints Content

Filter Results By
Showing Results 391 - 400 of 696
ICI Default BG

“Market Tantrums” and Mutual Funds: A Second Look

Over the past year, policymakers who are focused on financial stability have pursued a theory that mutual fund investors can destabilize financial markets by redeeming from funds when markets decline. According to this theory, redemptions by fund investors lead fund managers to sell...
ICI Default BG

Overseas Overreach

The Financial Stability Board (FSB)—composed of financial regulators and central bankers from around the globe—is proposing a flawed methodology that inappropriately puts regulated U.S. funds under scrutiny for possible designation as global systemically important financial...
ICI Default BG

Who Are the FSB 14?

In their search for ways that investment funds can pose risks to the financial system, regulators and central bankers from around the globe have proposed an arbitrary threshold: any investment fund with assets of more than $100 billion should automatically be subjected to further...
ICI Default BG

The Market Crash That Never Came

U.S. and international banking regulators, in their search for ways that mutual funds and their managers could threaten financial stability, have come up with a simple story: fund investors and asset managers “crowd or ‘herd’ into popular asset classes or securities” and thus “magnify...
ICI Default BG

Size by Itself Doesn’t Matter—Leverage Does

Second in a series of Viewpoints postings on funds and financial stability. The threshold set by the Financial Stability Board (FSB) for examining whether a regulated fund could pose risk to the financial system should be redrawn—or better yet, withdrawn.
ICI Default BG

SIFI Designation for Funds: Unnecessary and Harmful

U.S. and international regulators are examining whether asset managers or the investment funds that they offer could be sources of risk to the overall financial system and should thus be designated as systemically important financial institutions (SIFIs).