1 The SEC has designated the Depository Trust Company ("DTC") as the appropriate QRSD for purposes of the
Rule.
2 The Institute argued that, among other things: (1) since depositories typically play no role in the clearance and
settlement process for mutual fund shares (which are not DTC-eligible), requiring notification of DTC in the event of
mutual fund transfer agent changes would not advance the purposes of the Rule; (2) interpreting the Rule not to
apply to mutual fund transfer agents would be consistent with exclusions for mutual fund transfer agents under
certain other SEC rules governing transfer agent activities; and (3) notification of DTC is not necessary, because
mutual fund transfer agents are easily identified and located.
[9234]
September 11, 1997
TO: COMPLIANCE ADVISORY COMMITTEE No. 24-97
OPERATIONS MEMBERS No. 19-97
SEC RULES MEMBERS No. 67-97
TRANSFER AGENT ADVISORY COMMITTEE No. 47-97
RE: SEC STAFF AFFIRMS APPLICATION OF TRANSFER AGENT
NOTIFICATION REQUIREMENT TO MUTUAL FUND TRANSFER AGENTS
______________________________________________________________________________
Rule 17Ad-16 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Rule") requires a transfer
agent to notify the appropriate qualified registered securities depository ("QRSD")1 in writing
when it (1) ceases to perform transfer agent services on behalf of an issuer,
(2) changes its name or address, or (3) assumes transfer agent services on behalf of an issuer of
securities. To address certain ambiguities as to the applicability and scope of the Rule, the
Institute recently explored with the staff of the Securities and Exchange Commission the
feasibility of obtaining interpretive advice to the effect that the Rule does not apply to mutual
fund transfer agents. As discussed below, the Institute has learned that it is the staffs view
that the Rule applies to all transfer agents.
Through a series of communications with the SEC staff, the Institute requested their
concurrence that the Rule does not apply to mutual fund transfer agents, except in certain
limited circumstances.2 In addition, in the event the staff determined that the Rule does apply to
mutual fund transfer agents, the Institute requested their concurrence that neither the initial
transfer agent for a new mutual fund, nor the initial transfer agent for a new portfolio of an
existing mutual fund, is required to provide any notice to DTC pursuant to the rule upon the
commencement of transfer agent services for that fund or portfolio.
The staff recently expressed disagreement with the Institutes proposed interpretation of
the Rule and took the position that the Rule applies to all transfer agents, including mutual
3 The staffs views, which were communicated orally, did not address whether a transfer agent assuming transfer
agent services for a new portfolio of an existing fund must file a notice with DTC.
fund transfer agents. In addition, the staff asserted that the Rule requires mutual fund transfer
agents to notify DTC not only when there is a change in the transfer agent for an existing fund
(or the transfer agents name or address), but also when a transfer agent assumes transfer agent
services for a newly-organized fund.3 Finally, the staff indicated that it would not be inclined
to respond favorably to any request for no-action relief from the Rules requirements for
mutual fund transfer agents.
Mutual fund transfer agents should consider reviewing current procedures and revising
them, if necessary, to ensure compliance with the above-described SEC staff positions
regarding the requirements of Rule 17Ad-16.
Barry E. Simmons
Assistant Counsel
Latest Comment Letters:
TEST - ICI Comment Letter Opposing Sales Tax on Additional Services in Maryland
ICI Comment Letter Opposing Sales Tax on Additional Services in Maryland
ICI Response to the European Commission on the Savings and Investments Union