* In the Matter of Parnassus Investments, SEC Admin. Proc. File No. 3-9317 (May 28, 1997).
June 3, 1997
TO: COMPLIANCE ADVISORY COMMITTEE No. 19-97
SEC RULES MEMBERS No. 42-97
RE: SEC INSTITUTES PROCEEDINGS AGAINST FUND ADVISER, PRESIDENT
AND TRUSTEES FOR ALLEGED PRICING, SOFT DOLLAR VIOLATIONS
______________________________________________________________________________
The Securities and Exchange Commission recently instituted public administrative and
cease-and-desist proceedings against a funds investment adviser, an individual who is the
president and a director of the adviser and the president and a trustee of the fund, and two
independent trustees of the fund. In the attached order instituting proceedings,* the SEC
alleged that: (1) the respondents ignored relevant pricing and financial information about the
issuer of a security held by the fund and, as a result, the funds net asset value was overstated
for a two-year period; (2) the fund extended a loan to the issuer of the mispriced security in
violation of its fundamental policy against making loans; and (3) the adviser improperly used
the funds soft dollar credits for its own benefit. The SECs order is summarized below.
According to the order, the fund purchased securities of an issuer that subsequently
declared bankruptcy. The fund later purchased more of the securities and loaned the issuer
$100,000, memorialized by a promissory note with a one-year term. The due date of the note
subsequently was extended and the note was made convertible into common stock. For two
years after the issuers shares were delisted from NASDAQ, and despite actual sales prices that
were much lower, the funds board continued to price the shares at the last NASDAQ price. In
addition, the board valued the note as if it had been converted to stock and at an even higher
rate than that used to value the shares.
The order states that the adviser and its president ignored information in the issuers
Form 10-K about the "fair market value" of its securities, and failed to put the securitys value
on the agenda at certain board meetings. The boards valuation of the securities over the
period in question allegedly failed to take into account an offer the fund received for the
securities, relied on different financial data over time (depending on what was most favorable),
and ignored a negative television report about the issuers single largest customer. The SECs
order asserts that the respondents wilfully aided and abetted violations of Rule 22c-1 and also
caused violations of that rule. In addition, in connection with the $100,000 loan to the issuer,
the investment adviser and its president aided and abetted and caused the violation of Sections
13(a)(3) and 21(a) of the Investment Company Act.
The attached order further alleges that the fund earned soft dollar credits as a result of
directing brokerage to a national wirehouse firm and the adviser used those credits to purchase
products and services for itself. Specifically, the credits were used to purchase computers (one-
half of the use of which was for research-related functions and the other half for fund
accounting and transfer agent functions). The adviser also purchased fund accounting software
and updates. The order states that half of the computer expense and all of the software expense
amount to improper use of soft dollars by the adviser. As a result of these actions, the adviser
wilfully violated Section 17(e)(1) of the Investment Company Act and the president caused and
wilfully aided and abetted this violation. In addition, because the advisers Form ADV did not
disclose its use of the funds soft dollar credits to purchase non-research related products and
services, the adviser and its president wilfully violated Section 207 of the Investment Advisers
Act.
The SEC has ordered that a public hearing be held on this matter no earlier than 30 days
and no later than 60 days from service of the attached order.
Frances M. Stadler
Associate Counsel
Attachment (in .pdf format)
Note: Not all recipients of this memo will receive an attachment. If you wish to obtain a copy
of the attachment referred to in this memo, please call the Institute’s Information Resource
Center at (202)326-8304, and ask for this memo’s attachment number: 8966.
Latest Comment Letters:
TEST - ICI Comment Letter Opposing Sales Tax on Additional Services in Maryland
ICI Comment Letter Opposing Sales Tax on Additional Services in Maryland
ICI Response to the European Commission on the Savings and Investments Union