1 See Memorandum to Accounting/Treasurers Committee No. 36-96 and SEC Rules Committee No. 100-96, dated September 13, 1996.
November 5, 1996
TO: ACCOUNTING/TREASURERS COMMITTEE No. 42-96
SEC RULES COMMITTEE No. 118-96
RE: DRAFT COMMENT LETTER ON PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO RULE 18f-3
AND RULE 12b-1
______________________________________________________________________________
As we previously informed you, the SEC has proposed to amend Rule 18f-3 to expand
and clarify the methods a fund may use to allocate income, gains and losses, and fundwide
expenses among its classes.1 The proposed amendments also would clarify the voting rights of
"purchase" class shareholder regarding any proposed "target" class fee increase. In addition, a
proposed amendment to Rule 12b-1 would clarify that a series funds Rule 12b-1 plan must be
severable for each series and that whenever an action is required with respect to the plan, that
action must be taken separately for each series. Attached for your review is a draft of the
Institutes comment letter on the proposed amendments. Our proposed comments and related
issues are summarized below.
Comments on the proposed amendments must be filed with the SEC by November
18, If you have any comments on the attached draft letter, please contact Frances Stadler at
202/326-5822 or the undersigned at 202/326-5851 by November 14.
Accounting Allocation Methods
The draft letter supports the Commissions proposal to allow multiple class funds that
declare dividends daily to use the "Settled Shares" allocation methodology without requiring
the fund to maintain the same NAV per share in each class. The letter also supports the
proposal to allow daily dividend multiple class funds to allocate gains and losses based on
relative net assets, while using the Settled Shares method for allocating income and fundwide
expenses.
The proposing release noted that many funds operate in this latter manner and
requested comment on whether allocation of gains and losses based on relative net assets
and allocation of income and fundwide expenses based on Settled Shares should be
mandatory for funds using the Settled Shares method. Do members think it should be
mandatory or permissive? Would a mandatory requirement be a problem for funds that do
not accept and price purchase orders until they have received good funds?
The draft letter supports the proposal to permit multiple class funds to use the
"Simultaneous Equations" allocation methodology. The proposing release sought comments
on whether the equations utilized in this method should be specified in the rule. The draft
letter recommends that the rule exclude the equations. Do members agree?
In response to the Commissions request for comments on whether there are other
allocation methods that should be included in the rule or whether a fund should be able to use
any allocation method that results in shareholders of each class receiving their proportionate
share of income, gains and losses, and fundwide expenses, the draft letter indicates that upon
adoption of the proposed amendments, Rule 18f-3 will provide multiple class funds with a
sufficient range of accounting allocation methods. The letter also expresses concern that the
ability of a fund to develop and employ any accounting allocation method could lead to
questionable allocation methods that may not be in the best interests of all shareholders.
Do members agree with this proposed position? Alternatively, should funds be
allowed to use any allocation method that results in shareholders receiving their
proportionate share of income/expenses and gains/losses? If so, should a specified party
such as the adviser, the auditor or the board be required to make a determination that the
allocation method is fair?
Clarification of Shareholder Voting Rights/Amendment to Rule 12b-1
The draft letter supports the proposed amendment to Rule 18f-3 to clarify the voting
rights of "purchase class" shareholders with respect to increases in "target class" expenses and
the proposed amendment to Rule 12b-1 regarding series funds as described above.
Gregory M. Smith
Director - Operations/
Compliance & Fund Accounting
Attachment
Latest Comment Letters:
TEST - ICI Comment Letter Opposing Sales Tax on Additional Services in Maryland
ICI Comment Letter Opposing Sales Tax on Additional Services in Maryland
ICI Response to the European Commission on the Savings and Investments Union