October 30, 1996
TO: OPERATIONS COMMITTEE No. 31-96
RE: CHECK AGING STUDY - NOVEMBER, 1996
______________________________________________________________________________
At its October 20, 1996 meeting, the Operations Committee reviewed the results of the
check aging study conducted in May 1996 and concluded that an additional study should be
conducted during the month of November, 1996. The results of the May 1996 study, which
were previously provided (See memo to Operations Committee No.20-96-dated August 27,
1996) indicated that checks were not clearing as quickly as in previous studies. This is an
apparent reversal of the acceleration of check clearing noted in prior studies conducted after the
implementation of the Expedited Funds Availability Act in the late 1980s. Thus, the Committee
agreed that an immediate follow-up study is needed to test these surprising results.
Previous check studies conducted by the Institute have aided mutual funds in
establishing appropriate redemption policies regarding hold periods. Due to the increased
level and sophistication of check fraud, some Operations Committee members have been
reviewing their current hold policies to ensure there is sufficient time to detect and prevent
potential fraud schemes. The survey has also been useful for the Institute and its members in
responding to inquiries from the SEC and the Federal Reserve regarding check clearing and
hold policies.
Each Operations Committee member should complete the attached Check Aging forms
for seven mutual funds; preferably three equity funds, three bond funds, and one money
market fund. Please provide a separate form for each fund. ( Alternatively, if you utilize one
DDA for all your funds and wish to consolidate the data for all funds in your complex, you
may fill out one form. Please indicate on the form the number of funds in your complex on the
"Name of Fund" line.) All check aging survey forms should be completed and returned to the
Institute no later than January 31, 1997. Activity recorded is for the month of November 1996
only.
Check Aging Survey Forms
Please complete a separate survey form for each fund and be sure to fill out all questions
in the survey. The following information should be provided:
(1.) The total number of all shareholder purchase checks deposited and cleared during the
month of November, 1996.
(2.) Number of purchase checks returned by the bank as uncollected.
State the number of checks received for share purchases that were later dishonored or
returned by the bank. List the number of checks returned based upon the number of
days elapsed between the date of deposit and the date of return. For example, if during
November 1996, 5 checks were returned six days after the deposit, put the number 5 in
the box opposite number 6 in the "Elapsed Number of Days" column.
(3.) Reason for Return for Checks Returned After 11 Days
If checks were returned 11 or more days after deposit, please provide a brief description
of why the checks were returned - for example "Insufficient Funds".
(4.) The funds hold policy regarding purchase checks.
Please state the number of days the fund may delay the mailing of redemption
proceeds while waiting for a purchase check to clear. Please state the policy as set forth
in the funds prospectus and indicate whether it is in calendar or business days.
(5.) The number of redemption transactions in which proceeds were delayed because
they were received during the funds hold period.
Finally, if you are able to detect any patterns as to the source of returned checks (direct
investors, broker-dealers, financial planners, etc.), please provide a brief description on a
separate sheet.
Completion Date
Please complete this information and return to Beatrice Williar (fax number 202/326-
5853) at the Investment Company Institute, 1401 H Street, NW, Washington, DC 20005. All
surveys should be returned no later than January 31, 1996.
We appreciate your participation in this study. If you have any questions regarding the
survey, please contact the undersigned at 202/326-5850.
Justine Phoenix
Director - Operations/
Transfer Agency
Attachments
Latest Comment Letters:
TEST - ICI Comment Letter Opposing Sales Tax on Additional Services in Maryland
ICI Comment Letter Opposing Sales Tax on Additional Services in Maryland
ICI Response to the European Commission on the Savings and Investments Union