July 28, 1994
TO: BOARD OF GOVERNORS NO. 67-94
FEDERAL LEGISLATION COMMITTEE NO. 17-94
FEDERAL LEGISLATION MEMBERS NO. 14-94
SEC RULES COMMITTEE NO. 85-94
RE: INSTITUTE TESTIFIES ON SMALL BUSINESS LEGISLATION; OPPOSES
EXEMPTIONS TO 1940 ACT
__________________________________________________________
On July 26th, Institute President Matthew P. Fink testified
before the Telecommunications and Finance Subcommittee of the
House Energy and Commerce Committee on S. 479, the "Small
Business Incentive Act." This legislation was introduced by
Senate Securities Subcommittee Chairman Christopher Dodd (D-CT)
and passed by the Senate last year.
The Institute expressed its support for the basic objective
of the bill, which is to provide capital to small businesses.
The Institute expressed concern, however, that certain provisions
of the bill would unnecessarily weaken investor protections that
are provided under the Investment Company Act of 1940 and that
"any proposal to compromise these investor protections must be
approached with caution."
Noting that the mutual fund industry already provides more
than $31 billion of capital for small businesses through over 100
small-company funds, Fink stated, "The ability of investment
companies to provide this capital is in large part due to the
strong investor protections provided by the federal securities
laws and the public confidence that they have engendered."
In particular, the Institute objected to certain aspects of
the proposed exemption from the Act for certain pools of
securities held exclusively by "qualified purchasers." Mr. Fink
stated that "although the bill is designed to assist small
businesses, it would not require these unregulated pools to
invest any of their assets in securities issued by small
businesses. Thus, these unregulated funds could invest 100% in
large companies listed on the New York Stock Exchange, or 100% in
foreign securities, without any investment in small businesses.
If the capital needs of small business underlie the broad
exemption provided by S. 479, then Congress should ensure that
these pools actually do provide capital to small businesses by
restricting their portfolio holdings to securities of smaller
business enterprises and other appropriate investments."
-2-
The Institute also objected to the grant of broad rulemaking
authority to the SEC to define such a "qualified purchaser." The
Institute believes that this grant could result in the offering
of unregulated pools of securities to an unnecessarily large and
potentially unsophisticated class of investors.
The Institute also expressed concerns about the proposed
amendments to the business development company ("BDC") provisions
of the Investment Company Act which would have the effect of
converting BDCs into passive investment vehicles similar to
traditional investment companies, thus calling into question the
special treatment they receive under the '40 Act. Finally, the
Institute expressed concern about another proposal, to create so-
called "managerial strategic investment companies," ("MSICs")
which would also be exempt from many provisions of the Investment
Company Act.
SEC Commissioner J. Carter Beese, Jr., testifying for the
Commission, stated that S. 479 promotes growth while maintaining
investor protection. The Commission believes the bill would
assist venture capital formation and funding by creating a new
financing vehicle for highly sophisticated investors, and by
streamlining the regulation of "private" investment companies.
Commissioner Beese expressed concern about the broad exemptions
that would be granted to MSICs, but indicated that Congress may
want to consider very narrow exemptions to MSICs in order for
MSICs to accomplish their goals.
Barry Guthary, on behalf of the North American Securities
Administrators Association ("NASAA"), expressed NASAA's guared
support of S. 479, noted that S. 479 has no direct connection to
small business and may be used to create unregulated hedge funds.
Copies of the Institute's, the SEC, and NASAA's testimony
are attached. We are happy to respond to any questions and will
keep you informed of further developments. For additional
information, please call the Legislative Affairs Department at
202-326-5890.
This memo can also be found on FUNDS, the Institute's Fund
User Network and Delivery System, under "Legislative Affairs;
Washington, Update."
Julie Domenick
Senior Vice President
Legislative Affairs
Attachments
Latest Comment Letters:
TEST - ICI Comment Letter Opposing Sales Tax on Additional Services in Maryland
ICI Comment Letter Opposing Sales Tax on Additional Services in Maryland
ICI Response to the European Commission on the Savings and Investments Union