March 1, 1994
TO: INVESTMENT ADVISERS COMMITTEE NO. 17-94
STATE LIAISON COMMITTEE NO. 18-94
UNIT INVESTMENT TRUST COMMITTEE NO. 16-94
ARIZONA ASSOCIATE MEMBERS
RE: ARIZONA LEGISLATION INTRODUCED TO IMPLEMENT UNIFORMITY
PROCEDURES AND REGULATE INVESTMENT ADVISERS
__________________________________________________________
Legislation was recently introduced in the Arizona Legislature to amend
various provisions of the Arizona Securities Act ("the Act"). The proposed
legislation, House Bill 2512, includes amendments to implement provisions from
the NASAA Model Investment Company Registration and Reporting Procedures and
authorize the registration and regulation of investment advisers and investment
adviser representatives. These provisions are briefly summarized below.
1. "True" Indefinite Registration
(Sections 44-3321 - 44-3324, pp. 24-28)
House Bill 2512 would require mutual funds and unit trusts to register an
indefinite amount of securities. A mutual fund would register an indefinite
amount of securities by payment of the minimum fee of $200 at the time of filing
an application for registration or renewal. Thereafter, within two months of the
fund's fiscal year end, the fund must either file a sales report and pay a fee
of 1/10th of one percent of the aggregate dollar amount sold in Arizona during
the registration period, less $200, or pay a fee of $3300. To renew the
registration for the following year, the fund must file the appropriate renewal
documents and pay an additional $200 renewal fee.
A unit investment trust would register an indefinite amount of securities
by payment of the minimum fee of $200 at the time of registration. Thereafter,
within two months after the anniversary of the trust's effective date, the trust
must either file a sales report and pay a fee of 1/10th of one percent of the
aggregate dollar amount sold in Arizona during the registration period, less
$200, or pay a fee of $3300. The registration of a unit investment trust would
be effective for one year from the effective date of registration with the
Securities and Exchange Commission. To renew the registration for an additional
year, the trust must file the appropriate documents and pay an additional $200
renewal fee.
The legislation also increases the maximum registration fee for investment
companies from $2000 to $3500. According to the staff of the Securities
Division, this increase is necessary to ensure that the "true" indefinite
registration will be revenue neutral to the Commission. The minimum fee remains
the same (i.e.. $200, see attached Amendment to House Bill 2512).
Currently, investment companies must register a definite amount of
securities and pay a registration fee of 1/10th of one percent of the aggregate
dollar amount of securities registered, with a minimum fee of $200 and a maximum
fee of $2000. In the event of an oversale, shares may be retroactively
registered by paying a fee equal to three times the difference between the
initial registration fee paid and the registration fee required.
2. Regulation of Investment Advisers and Investment Advise
r
Repres
entati
ves
(Sections 44-3151 - 44-3261, pp. 10-21)
The Arizona legislation would amend the Act in a manner generally
consistent with the NASAA Model Amendments to the Uniform Securities Act. For
example, House Bill 2512 would:
1. require the registration of investment advisers and investment
adviser representatives. The registration fee will be $250 for an
adviser and $40 for each representative;
2. provide an exemption from the registration requirement for
registered dealers and their salesmen and for persons who do not
have a place of business in Arizona and who do not direct business
communicatins to more than five clients;
3. permit the Commission to require by rule a surety bond of up to
$100,000 of any adviser with custody or control of any customer
funds or securities;
4. require the annual filing of an audited balance sheet by any adviser
that has custody of client funds or securities or requires
prepayment of advisory fees. Advisers with discretionary authority
who do not have custody or control of client funds or securities
must annually file a balance sheet, which need not be audited; and
5. define fraudulent conduct.
Unlike the NASAA Model Amendments, however, the legislation does not
require disclosure (i.e., a brochure rule) beyond the general anti-fraud
provision nor maintenance of books and records.
* * * * *
A copy of House Bill 2512 and an amendment passed thereto by the Arizona
House of Representatives Committee on Commerce are attached. We will keep you
advised of developments.
Tamara K. Cain
Assistant Counsel
Attachments
Latest Comment Letters:
TEST - ICI Comment Letter Opposing Sales Tax on Additional Services in Maryland
ICI Comment Letter Opposing Sales Tax on Additional Services in Maryland
ICI Response to the European Commission on the Savings and Investments Union