January 15, 1993
TO: BROKER/DEALER ADVISORY COMMITTEE NO. 3-93
OPERATIONS MEMBERS NO. 6-93
SEC RULES MEMBERS NO. 8-93
SMALL FUNDS MEMBERS NO. 1-93
TRANSFER AGENT ADVISORY COMMITTEE NO. 5-93
UNIT INVESTMENT TRUST MEMBERS NO. 5-93
RE: SEC STAFF ISSUES FAVORABLE RESPONSE TO INSTITUTE LETTER ON
AUTOMATIC DIVIDEND REINVESTMENT CONFIRMATION REQUIREMENTS
__________________________________________________________
The Institute is pleased to report that the staff of the
SEC's Division of Market Regulation recently issued a favorable
response to an Institute request to allow the sending of
quarterly, rather than immediate, confirmations to shareholders
with respect to automatic dividend reinvestment transactions in
investment company shares. The Institute had asked the staff to
issue an interpretation under Rule 10b-10 under the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, stating that investment companies' plans or
services providing for the automatic reinvestment of dividends or
capital gains distributions into the same or another fund are
"investment company plans" as defined in paragraph (e)(6)(ii) of
the Rule. The staff's letter concurs that automatic dividend
reinvestment services conducted in the manner described in their
letter constitute "investment company plans" and, therefore, that
transactions pursuant to such services may be confirmed on
quarterly statements pursuant to paragraph (b) of Rule 10b-10.
In the letter, the staff discusses automatic dividend
reinvestment services and the time frames within which
reinvestments in fund shares should be effected. These time
frames vary depending upon whether the reinvestment is made into
the same fund or an affiliated fund, or into an unaffiliated
fund. In describing these time frames, the staff uses the term
"payable date" to connote the date on which a reinvested dividend
is paid and the term "reinvestment date" to refer to the date on
which additional shares are credited to a shareholder's account.
(Although the staff characterized these as two separate events,
in practice the payment of a reinvested dividend and placement of
additional shares into a shareholder's account are one event,
which occurs on a date commonly referred to by industry members
as the "reinvestment date.")
The staff's letter further states that "[i]n every case,
the prospectus of the paying fund or the receiving fund discloses
when the reinvestment date occurs relative to the payable date
for each dividend." The Institute informed the staff after
receiving the letter that fund prospectuses might not contain
specific disclosure concerning the payable date for each
dividend, but typically would contain a general discussion
explaining when reinvestments are made. (Previously, we had
explained to the staff that the reinvestment of dividend proceeds
into shares of the same fund, an affiliated fund or an
unaffiliated fund would be made at the next forward price
following receipt of reinvestment proceeds by such fund.)
Consequently, the staff indicated that they will not require
disclosure using the specific terms "payable date" and
"reinvestment date," so long as there is meaningful disclosure
allowing investors to understand when reinvestments will occur.
Another point which was further clarified with the staff
after receipt of their letter concerns the definition of "cross-
reinvestment service" on pages 1-2 of the letter. Specifically,
the staff agreed that the account into which "cross-
reinvestments" will be made need not necessarily already hold
shares as indicated in the staff's letter, but may be an open
account that has a zero balance (no actual shares in it).
* * * * *
In addition to concurring with the Institute's view that
automatic dividend reinvestment plans qualify as "investment
company plans" under Rule 10b-10, the staff's letter agrees with
the Institute that automatic investment plans and systematic
withdrawal plans (as described in the letter) offered by
investment companies also are "investment company plans" eligible
to use the quarterly confirmation procedures set forth in
paragraph (b) of the rule.
Copies of the Institute's interpretive request and the
staff's response are attached.
Frances M. Stadler Kathleen C. Joaquin
Assistant Counsel Director -Operations/Fund
Accounting
Attachments
Latest Comment Letters:
TEST - ICI Comment Letter Opposing Sales Tax on Additional Services in Maryland
ICI Comment Letter Opposing Sales Tax on Additional Services in Maryland
ICI Response to the European Commission on the Savings and Investments Union