July 7, 1992
TO: SEC RULES COMMITTEE NO. 44-92
INVESTMENT ISSUES COMMITTEE NO. 9-92
INVESTMENT ADVISERS COMMITTEE NO. 28-92
CLOSED-END FUND COMMITTEE NO. 12-92
RE: SEC REPROPOSES PROXY REFORM AMENDMENTS AND PROPOSES
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION AMENDMENTS
__________________________________________________________
The Securities and Exchange Commission has issued for
public comment a revised proposal to amend the proxy rules under
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and a proposal to enhance
proxy disclosure of executive compensation. A copy of the SEC
releases are attached.
A brief summary of the proposals is set forth below.
Proxy Rules
As you may recall, last year the SEC proposed amendments to
the proxy rules under the Exchange Act. (See Memorandum to SEC
Rules Committee No. 35-91, Investment Issues Committee No. 4-91,
Investment Advisers Committee No. 25-91 and Closed-End Fund
Committee No. 14-91, dated June 19, 1991.) In response to the
over 900 comment letters received by the SEC, the SEC revised the
proposal and reissued it for public comment.
The Institute’s comment letter on the initial proposal
focused on that part of the proposal that would have allowed
securityholders open access to shareholder lists for purposes of
making solicitations. The Institute opposed the application of
this amendment to mutual funds on the grounds that mutual fund
shareholders differ in many important respects from stockholders
of publicly traded securities. (See Memorandum to SEC Rules
Committee No. 60-91, Investment Issues Committee No. 16-91,
Investment Adviser Committee No. 49-91 and Closed-End Committee
No. 24-91, dated September 24, 1991). As reproprosed by the SEC,
registrants would remain able to elect to mail soliciting
materials, rather than provide a list of shareholders, except in
the case of roll-ups and going private transactions. Under the
reproprosed rules, if a shareholder list is provided to a
soliciting shareholder, the shareholder would have to certify
that the list will be used only for solicitation purposes. If
the company denies access to the shareholder list, it would have
to disclose the denial in its proxy statement.
Other aspects of the reproposed amendments to the proxy
rules generally would:
1. permit shareholders and other persons to
exchange views or comment on a proxy solicitation
undertaken by a registrant, or any other person,
without having to file with the SEC or deliver a
proxy statement to solicited shareholders, so long
as public notice of extensive soliciting activity
is provided in the manner described in the
proposal;
2. eliminate SEC preclearance of all soliciting
material other than the proxy statement and form of
proxy; and
3. make all soliciting material filed in
preliminary form public immediately upon filing,
except that confidential treatment would be
afforded in certain limited circumstances.
Executive Compensation
The executive compensation proposal would significantly
revise the SEC’s rules governing disclosure of executive
compensation. The proposal is intended to "consolidate the
requisite disclosure in a series of tables that would set forth
in a clear and understandable manner each element of compensation
paid, earned or awarded in a given year." The proposal also
would require the compensation committee to report on the factors
on which it based its compensation decisions.
With respect to the executives whose compensation must be
disclosed, the SEC release states that it does not propose to
alter the range of executives subject to individual disclosure of
executive compensation or to modify the executive group reporting
requirement (which is described in Item 402 of Reg. S-K), except
as necessary to assure inclusion of the CEO or other person
serving in this capacity. However, the proposal will raise the
present disclosure threshold of $60,000 annual compensation with
respect to individual executive officers, other than the CEO, to
$100,000.
Comment Period
The comment periods for the proxy reform and executive
compensation disclosure proposals expire on August 31, 1992.
Please provide me with your comments by August 10, 1992. My
direct number is 202/955-3523.
Amy B.R. Lancellotta
Associate Counsel
Attachment
Latest Comment Letters:
TEST - ICI Comment Letter Opposing Sales Tax on Additional Services in Maryland
ICI Comment Letter Opposing Sales Tax on Additional Services in Maryland
ICI Response to the European Commission on the Savings and Investments Union