
Fundamentals for Newer Directors 2014 (pdf)
The latest edition of ICI’s flagship publication shares a wealth of research and data on trends in the investment company industry.
[35760]
July 02, 2024
TO: ICI Members
On June 20, 2024, the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) issued Notice 2024-55,[1] which provides guidance regarding two provisions of the SECURE 2.0 Act[2]—Withdrawals for Certain Emergency Expenses (§115) and Penalty-Free Withdrawal from Retirement Plans for Individual in Case of Domestic Abuse (§314). Both provisions provide exceptions to the 10 percent additional tax on early withdrawals under section 72(t) of the Internal Revenue Code (Code),[3] and both provisions are already effective, for distributions made after December 31, 2023.
According to the Notice, the Treasury Department and the IRS plan to issue regulations under Code section 72(t). The Notice solicits public comments with respect to all aspects of Code section 72(t), but specifically requests comments related to repayments of certain early distributions. Comments are due by October 7, 2024.
The SECURE 2.0 Act provides a new exception from the 10 percent early withdrawal penalty for certain distributions from defined contribution (DC) plans and IRAs for specified emergency expenses (unforeseeable or immediate financial needs relating to personal or family emergency expenses). Plans generally may rely on certification from the individual that the distribution meets the criteria for EPEDs, and can permit the distributions as in-service withdrawals. Individuals are limited to one distribution per calendar year up to $1,000,[4] with the option to repay the distribution within three years. No additional emergency expense distributions are permitted from a plan during the immediately following three calendar year period unless the amount of previous distributions is recontributed to such plan.
The SECURE 2.0 Act provides for a new type of penalty-free in-service withdrawal from DC plans and IRAs for victims of domestic abuse meeting certain eligibility criteria (e.g., if made to an individual during the 1-year period beginning on any date on which the individual is a victim of domestic abuse by a spouse or domestic partner). The term "domestic abuse" means physical, psychological, sexual, emotional, or economic abuse, including efforts to control, isolate, humiliate, or intimidate the victim, or to undermine the victim's ability to reason independently, including by means of abuse of the victim's child or another family member living in the household. Plans adopting the provision are permitted to rely on a participant's self-certification of eligibility. The statute limits eligible distributions by an individual to the lesser of $10,000 (to be adjusted for inflation, in amounts rounded to the nearest multiple of $100) or 50 percent of the account balance. Participants generally are permitted to repay such distributions into an eligible retirement plan within three years.
The Notice provides guidance, in Q&A format, which includes:
Several of the Q&As provide similar guidance with respect to both types of distribution, as follows:
The Notice provides additional details specific to EPEDs, including two examples illustrating (a) how the dollar limitation should be applied in a circumstance when an amount less than $1,000 would be permitted and (b) determining whether a subsequent distribution may be taken within the following three-year period, based on the individual's repayments or new contributions. [Q&A A-5, A-6]
A determination of whether an expense meets the statutory definition (i.e., qualifies as being for "an unforeseeable or immediate financial need relating to necessary personal or family emergency expenses") is based on the relevant facts and circumstances for each individual. The Notice specifies that factors to be considered include, but are not limited to, whether the individual (or their family member) has expenses relating to:
The Notice provides additional details specific to DAVDs, including an example illustrating how the dollar limit is applied. [Q&A B-4]
Regarding the certification requirements for a DAVD, the Notice suggests that an employee could check a box on the distribution request form to certify that (1) the employee or participant is eligible for a DAVD and (2) the distribution is made during the one-year period beginning on any date on which the individual is a victim of domestic abuse. [Q&A B-9]
The Treasury Department and the IRS anticipate issuing regulations under Code section 72(t), and the Notice solicits public comments with respect to all aspects of Code section 72(t) and on all matters discussed in the Notice. Comments are due by October 7, 2024.
The Notice requests comments in particular on:
Shannon Salinas
Associate General Counsel - Retirement Policy
[1] Notice 2024-55 is available at https://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-drop/n-24-55.pdf.
[2] For a summary of the SECURE 2.0 Act, see ICI Memorandum No. 34795, dated January 12, 2023, available at https://www.ici.org/memo34795.
[3] Code section 72(t) generally applies a 10 percent additional tax on distributions (more specifically, on the portion of the distribution that is includible in gross income) from qualified retirement plans and IRAs for distributions taken before the plan participant or IRA owner attains age 59-1/2. There are several exceptions from the additional tax that may apply, depending on the circumstance and whether the distribution comes out of a qualified plan or IRA.
[4] Section 72(t)(I)(iii) limits the distribution amount to the lessor of: $1,000, or the individual's nonforfeitable accrued benefit minus $1,000.
[5] This seems to provide confirmation that the individual is permitted to make a repayment to a plan or IRA other than the plan or IRA from which they took the distribution. However, in order to make a subsequent EPED or DAVD within the following three-year period, the statutory language seems to require that the repayment (or new contribution) be made to the plan from which the distribution was taken.
Latest Comment Letters:
TEST - ICI Comment Letter Opposing Sales Tax on Additional Services in Maryland
ICI Comment Letter Opposing Sales Tax on Additional Services in Maryland
ICI Response to the European Commission on the Savings and Investments Union