
Fundamentals for Newer Directors 2014 (pdf)
The latest edition of ICI’s flagship publication shares a wealth of research and data on trends in the investment company industry.
[33161]
March 5, 2021 TO: ICI Members
On March 5, the UK Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) announced the future cessation and non-representativeness dates for all LIBOR rates. As of the dates stated below, the ICE Benchmark Administration (IBA) will cease providing LIBOR for all currencies.[1] The move was commended by stakeholders, including the Alternative Reference Rate Committee (ARRC) in the US.
The FCA also announced that it will consult on requiring IBA to provide “synthetic” LIBOR for some currencies after the cessation date as well as consult on permitting synthetic LIBOR use in tough legacy contracts.
We discuss below the cessation dates, the potential for synthetic LIBOR, and the impact of the announcement on ISDA derivatives and other contracts or financial instruments under the EU Benchmarks Regulation, the proposed New York State legislation, and other types of agreed-upon contractual fallback language.
The FCA announced the following LIBOR rates will cease publication as of the dates below:
The FCA also announced that the following LIBOR rates will be no longer representative after December 31, 2021:
Finally, it announced that 1-month, 3-month, and 6-month USD LIBOR will be no longer representative after June 30, 2023.
The FCA stated that it would consult with the IBA on continuing to publish the following rates for a short period of time as synthetic LIBOR after 2021:
The FCA also announced it would continue to consider the case for synthetic USD LIBOR to be published after June 2023.
Alongside the announcement, the FCA issued its statement of policy[2] on how it would exercise its expected Article 23D powers to change a critical benchmark’s calculation methodology (i.e.., create synthetic LIBOR). The statement of policy contends that the FCA will only use its Article 23D powers if it determines that:
In exercising its powers, the FCA will seek to achieve a fair approximation of the ceased benchmark through the changed methodology and to make the least disturbance to affected parties. It will take into account the likely impact of the use of its power outside the UK by extending its engagement to global market participants.
Notably, in its LIBOR cessation announcement, the FCA reminded market participants that the “new” use of synthetic LIBOR by UK regulated firms would be prohibited and continued use by regulated firms in legacy financial instruments would be subject to the FCA allowing such use. The FCA intends to further consult on the prohibition on new use and the permitting exceptional use for tough legacy contracts in in Q2 2021.
As expected, the formal cessation announcement impacts several transition efforts, including as follows:
Concurrent with issuing the formal cessation notice, the FCA issued an updated statement of policy on the considerations it will take into account when exercising its powers, as proposed under the Financial Services Bill, to ‘designate’ a critical benchmark and to impose changes to that benchmark. [6]
Pursuant to the consultations that the FCA issued earlier this year, it also issued statements of policy on its expected new powers under Article 23A[7] of the UK Benchmarks Regulation. Regarding the Article 23A power to designate a benchmark as critical, which would be one requirement before deciding to issue a synthetic version of that ceased benchmark, the FCA will consider among other factors:
Bridget Farrell
Assistant General Counsel
[1] See FCA announcement on future cessation and loss of representativeness of the LIBOR benchmarks (March 5, 2021), available at https://www.fca.org.uk/publication/documents/future-cessation-loss-representativeness-libor-benchmarks.pdf. See also ARRC Commends Decisions Outlining the Definitive Endgame of LIBOR (March 5, 2021), available at https://www.newyorkfed.org/medialibrary/Microsites/arrc/files/2021/ARRC_Press_Release_Endgame.pdf.
[2] https://www.fca.org.uk/publication/policy/statement-policy-fca-powers-article-23d-bmr.pdf
[3] See LIBOR Cessation and the Impact on Fallbacks (March 5, 2021), available at https://www.isda.org/2021/03/05/libor-cessation-and-the-impact-on-fallbacks/.
[4] See Amendments to Regulation (EU) 2016/1011, Article 23b, available at https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32021R0168&from=EN.
[5] See, e.g., ARRC Announces Further Details Regarding Its Recommendation of Spread Adjustments for Cash Products (June 30, 2020) (“For all cash products, in the event that a pre-cessation event is operative, the ARRC’s recommended 5-year historical median spread adjustments will be determined at the same time as the ISDA’s spread adjustments, which will be at the time of any announcement that LIBOR will or has ceased or will or has become no longer representative.”), available at https://www.newyorkfed.org/medialibrary/Microsites/arrc/files/2020/ARRC_Recommendation_Spread_Adjustments_Cash_Products_Press_Release.pdf.
[6] See Benchmarks Regulation and proposed amendments under the Financial Services Bill (March 2021), available at https://www.fca.org.uk/publication/policy/benchmarks-regulation-proposed-amendments-financial-services-bill.pdf.
[7] https://www.fca.org.uk/publication/policy/statement-policy-benchmarks-article-23a-bmr.pdf
Latest Comment Letters:
TEST - ICI Comment Letter Opposing Sales Tax on Additional Services in Maryland
ICI Comment Letter Opposing Sales Tax on Additional Services in Maryland
ICI Response to the European Commission on the Savings and Investments Union