
Fundamentals for Newer Directors 2014 (pdf)
The latest edition of ICI’s flagship publication shares a wealth of research and data on trends in the investment company industry.
[32115]
December 19, 2019 TO: ICI Members
The CFTC Divisions of Swap Dealer and Intermediary Oversight (DSIO), Market Oversight (DMO), and Clearing and Risk (DCR) recently each issued a no-action letter[1] intended to provide relief to swap dealers and other market participants with respect to the transition from LIBOR and other IBORs to alternative reference rates.
In letter 19-26, DSIO granted conditional no-action relief to market participants who make “Qualifying Amendments” to uncleared Legacy Swaps[2] and Pre-Transition Swaps.[3] For purposes of the relief, a Qualifying Amendment includes the amendment of an uncleared swap that references an IRR solely to (i) include new fallback language to alternative reference rates triggered by permanent discontinuation of LIBOR or other IBORs or a determination that they are non-representative,[4] or (ii) accommodate the replacement of IRRs in the swap.[5]
Specifically, DSIO will not recommend enforcement action if:
In Letter 19-27, DMO provided time-limited no-action relief concerning the application of the trade execution requirements under Commodity Exchange Act section 2(h)(8)[11] if market participants use various mechanisms to transition swaps from IBORs to risk-free rates, including making amendments for fallback language to replace an IBOR, upon its cessation, with a risk-free rate (either pursuant to an ISDA protocol or entered into bilaterally), making replacement rate amendments before the cessation of an IBOR, or trading new swaps that reference risk-free rates (collectively, “IBOR Transition Mechanisms”). Until December 31, 2020, DMO will not recommend enforcement action for failure to comply with the section 2(h)(8) trade execution requirements for swaps that are amended or created by an IBOR Transition Mechanism for the sole purpose of replacing the applicable IBOR with a risk-free rate.
In Letter 19-28, DCR provided time-limited no-action relief with respect to compliance with the swap clearing requirements under Commodity Exchange Act section 2(h)(1)(A) and associated CFTC regulations when swap counterparties amend Uncleared Legacy IRS to reference risk-free rates instead of IBORs.[12]
DCR’s letter provides that, until December 31, 2021:
The FSB issued a report on the progress being made across the globe in the transition from IBORs to alternative risk-free rates.[14] The FSB particularly cites concerns with continued use of LIBOR, where the lack of applicable wholesale unsecured funding markets continues to exist without a likelihood to change. The FSB concludes that continued reliance of global financial markets on LIBOR poses risks to financial stability.
The report makes several additional high-level findings, including:
Finally, ISDA has issued a supplemental consultation on the spread and term adjustments that would apply to fallbacks for derivatives referencing Euro LIBOR and EURIBOR.[15] The consultation also inquires whether the same adjustments would be appropriate to use in fallback language for other, lesser-used IBORs as well.
ISDA notes its previous consultations regarding the spread and term adjustments for other IBORs.[16] Respondents to those consultations preferred the compounded setting in arrears rate and the historical mean/median approach.[17] With respect to spread adjustments for other IBORs, a majority of respondents preferred a calculation of the spread adjustment on a historical median over a five-year lookback period.[18]
ICI is not planning to comment on this consultation but encourages member firms to comment directly if you have feedback to provide. ISDA has requested feedback by January 21, 2020.
Sarah A. Bessin
Associate General Counsel
Bridget Farrell
Assistant General Counsel
[1] See https://www.cftc.gov/PressRoom/PressReleases/8096-19. The no-action letters are available at https://www.cftc.gov/LawRegulation/CFTCStaffLetters/letters.htm.
[2] The letter defines “Legacy Swaps” as uncleared swaps that were entered into prior to the compliance date of a particular regulatory requirement, with the result that such requirement did not apply to those swaps.
[3] The letter defines a “Pre-Transition Swap” as an uncleared swap (including a Legacy Swap) that was entered into prior to the effective date of a Fallback Amendment or a replacement rate amendment. The letter defines a “Fallback Amendment” as an amendment to a swap solely for the purpose of including fallbacks triggered only by (i) permanent discontinuation of an Impaired Reference Rate (IRR) or (ii) a determination that an IRR is non-representative. It defines a “replacement rate amendment” as a voluntary conversion by a market participant of IRR-linked uncleared swaps to alternative reference rates prior to the permanent cessation of the applicable IRR or a determination that it is non-representative.
[4] For purposes of this letter, the Division defines these rates and any replacement rates that do not meet counterparties’ commercial needs (such as temporary replacement rate) as “Impaired Reference Rates” or IRRs.
[5] For purposes of the relief, a Qualifying Amendment may include ancillary changes to existing trade terms to conform to different market conventions, resulting, for example, in different reset dates, fixed/floating leg payment dates, business day conventions, and day count fractions. However, a Qualifying Amendment may not include any amendment that (i) extends the maximum maturity of a swap or a portfolio of swaps beyond what is necessary to accommodate the differences between market conventions for an IRR and its replacement, or (ii) increases the total effective notional amount of a swap or the aggregate total effective notional amount of a portfolio of swaps beyond what is necessary to accommodate the differences between market conventions for an IRR and its replacement. These limitations are intended to harmonize the no-action relief with amendments to uncleared swap margin rules that the Prudential Regulators have proposed. The Prudential Regulators’ proposal is available at https://www.fdic.gov/news/board/2019/2019-09-17-notice-dis-b-fr.pdf. For a summary of the Prudential Regulators’ proposal, please see ICI Memorandum No. 31989 (Oct. 1, 2019), available at https://www.ici.org/my_ici/memorandum/memo31989.
[6] See Commodity Exchange Act Section 1a(49)(D) and subparagraph (4) of the definition of swap dealer in 17 CFR 1.3 (providing that a person shall not be a deemed to be a swap dealer until its aggregate gross notional amount of swaps connected with swap dealing activity, during the preceding 12 months, exceeds the gross notional threshold).
[7] See Margin Requirements for Uncleared Swaps and Major Swap Participants, 85 FR 636 (Jan. 6, 2016).
[8] Such basis rate swaps would swap the entire IRR basis for a portfolio with an alternative reference rate basis without amending any of the swaps referencing IRRs.
[9] See Commission Regulation 23.500 – 23.504 (CFTC swap trading relationship documentation rules).
[10] DSIO provided related no-action relief with respect to the status of certain end-users as ECPs and documentation requirements with respect to non-financial end-users.
[11] Broadly, section 2(h)(8) requires swap transactions subject to the clearing requirement to be executed on a designated contract market or swap execution facility (either registered with the CFTC or exempt from registration) unless no designated contract market or swap execution facility makes the swap available to trade or the relevant swap transaction is subject to the clearing exception under the Commodity Exchange Act.
[12] The letter defines “Uncleared Legacy IRS” as uncleared swaps that were executed prior to the compliance date on which swap counterparties were required to begin centrally clearing interest rate swaps pursuant to the CFTC’s swap clearing requirement, and are subsequently amended by adding a Fallback Amendment.
[13] The letter provides relief only with respect to Uncleared Legacy IRS being amended from—to: GBP LIBOR – SONIA; CHF LIBOR – SARON; JPY LIBOR – TONA; USD LIBOR – SOFR; and SGD SOR-VWAP – SORA. DCR notes, however, that it will consider providing additional relief for amendments to Uncleared Legacy IRS to transition from other IBOR floating rates to their identified risk-free rates when relevant authorities in foreign jurisdictions announce plans for such transitions.
[14] Reforming major interest rate benchmarks: Progress report; available at https://www.fsb.org/wp-content/uploads/P181219.pdf.
[15] Supplemental Consultation on Spread and Term Adjustments, including Final Parameters thereof, for Fallbacks in Derivatives Referencing EUR LIBOR and EURIBOR, as well as other less widely used IBORs, available at https://www.isda.org/a/xayTE/EUR-LIBOR-EURIBOR-Fallbacks-Consultation-FINAL.pdf.
[16] Specifically, BP LIBOR, CHF LIBOR, JPY LIBOR, TIBOR, Euroyen TIBOR, BBSW, USD LIBOR, CDOR and HIBOR.
[17] See Anonymized Narrative Summary of Responses to the ISDA Consultation on Term Fixings and Spread Adjustment Methodologies, available at http://assets.isda.org/media/04d213b6/db0b0fd7-pdf/; Summary of Responses to the ISDA Supplemental Consultation on Spread and Term Adjustments, available at https://www.isda.org/a/0LPTE/2019.09.18-Anonymized-ISDA-Supplemental-Consultation-Report.pdf.
[18] See Summary of Responses to the ISDA Consultation on Final Parameters for the Spread and Term Adjustments, available at https://www.isda.org/a/935TE/2019.11.15-ISDA-Final-Parameters-Consultation-Report.pdf.
Latest Comment Letters:
TEST - ICI Comment Letter Opposing Sales Tax on Additional Services in Maryland
ICI Comment Letter Opposing Sales Tax on Additional Services in Maryland
ICI Response to the European Commission on the Savings and Investments Union