
Fundamentals for Newer Directors 2014 (pdf)
The latest edition of ICI’s flagship publication shares a wealth of research and data on trends in the investment company industry.
[31506]
November 29, 2018 TO: ICI Members
On October 30, 2018, the Securities and Exchange Commission proposed rule and form amendments to modernize disclosure regarding variable annuity and variable life insurance contracts (“Proposal”).[1] The centerpiece of the Proposal is new Rule 498A (“VIP Summary Prospectus Rule”), which would allow issuers of variable annuity contracts and variable life insurance policies to use a summary prospectus to satisfy prospectus delivery obligations under Section 5 of the Securities Act of 1933.
The SEC requests comment on a variety of significant issues, both in connection with the VIP Summary Prospectus Rule and VIP regulation more generally. The public comment period expires on February 15, 2019.
We have summarized, below, the key aspects of the Proposal, focusing on those most relevant to registered open-end investment companies that serve as investment options for variable insurance products (VIPs).
The Proposal includes the following components:
The approach reflected in the VIP Summary Prospectus Rule is similar to that taken in Rule 498, the mutual fund summary prospectus rule, but includes several key differences that reflect the unique nature of variable insurance products, as discussed below.
The VIP Summary Prospectus Rule would permit, but not require, use of two distinct types of summary prospectuses for VIPs to satisfy prospectus delivery obligations under Section 5(b)(2) of the 1933 Act: (1) an “initial summary prospectus” to be provided in connection with sales of VIPs to new investors; and (2) an “updating summary prospectus” to be provided to investors who are existing contract owners. Use of summary prospectuses would be conditioned on, among other things, making the statutory prospectus and other materials available online, and sending such materials to investors in paper or electronically upon request. Importantly, like the mutual fund summary prospectus rule, the VIP Summary Prospectus Rule, subject to certain conditions, would permit issuers of VIPs to incorporate by reference into both the initial summary prospectus, as well as the updating summary prospectus, information contained in the statutory prospectus, SAI and, in the case of variable annuity separate accounts registered as management investment companies, shareholder reports.[2] The SEC requests comment regarding the various disclosure requirements and presentation of information for the initial and summary prospectus.
Under the VIP Summary Prospectus Rule, an initial summary prospectus may describe only a single contract[3] that the registrant currently offers for sale, and would be required to include certain information, and only that information, in the same order, and under the relevant corresponding headings, as the proposed rule specifies, including the following:
Under current industry practice, insurance companies typically send the updated VIP statutory prospectus to existing contract owners each year to satisfy prospectus delivery obligations in connection with additional purchase payments or premium payments that may be received, or the reallocation of contract value that may be made, in the coming year. Under the VIP Summary Prospectus Rule, this obligation could be satisfied with respect to existing investors by providing an “updating summary prospectus” rather than a full statutory prospectus. An updating summary prospectus would discuss any material changes that have occurred with respect to the contract during the past year, as well as certain information required in the initial summary prospectus, including the following:
The SEC stated that, in describing any changes to the contract, issuers should “provide enough detail to allow investors to understand the change and how it will affect them.”[7] Appendix B to the Proposing Release, which provides a hypothetical updating summary prospectus and briefly lists contract changes in bullet format, suggests that this disclosure need not be extensive.[8]
The updating summary prospectus would be required to contain the information required by the VIP Summary Prospectus Rule in the specific order outlined in the rule. In addition, the VIP Summary Prospectus Rule would permit the updating summary prospectus to describe one or more contracts covered in the statutory prospectus to which the updating summary prospectus relates. This contrasts with the initial summary prospectus, which would be limited to describing only one contract. However, a registrant would only be permitted to use an updating summary prospectus if it uses an initial summary prospectus for each currently offered contract described under the current statutory prospectus to which the updating summary prospectus relates.
The VIP Summary Prospectus Rule would require an appendix of portfolio companies that would include a legend: (1) stating that the portfolio companies listed are currently available under the VIP and are subject to change; (2) providing a hyperlink to a landing page, a telephone number and an email address that investors may use to obtain a copy of a portfolio company’s summary and statutory prospectus; and (3) stating that the portfolio company expense information provided does not reflect contract charges, performance would be lower if these charges were included, and past performance does not indicate future performance. The appendix would then identify each portfolio company available as an investment option in a table indicating each portfolio company’s type or investment objective, name, investment adviser or subadviser, gross expense ratio and average annual total returns for the past 1-year, 5-year and 10-year periods. Additionally, if the portfolio companies that are available vary based on benefit options selected, the appendix also would include a separate table identifying the portfolio companies available under each benefit.
The SEC requests comment regarding the disclosure and presentation requirements of the appendix of portfolio securities and whether alternative disclosure or a different presentation would be more useful to investors. It requests comment on specific issues including whether: (1) particular disclosure items that it has proposed for inclusion in the appendix are useful and appropriate for consideration by investors, or should it revise, supplement or replace those items; (2) to require advertising disclosures contemplated by Rule 482, such as legends providing certain statements about performance data and certain information about sales loads or performance fees; and (3) in the case of an updating summary prospectus, the appendix should identify portfolio companies that have been added, removed, or closed to additional investment during the period covered by the update.
Under the VIP Summary Prospectus Rule, an issuer could satisfy its prospectus delivery obligations by providing investors with a contract summary prospectus and making the contract statutory prospectus available online and in paper or electronically by request. The VIP Summary Prospectus Rule’s requirements relating to online accessibility would be similar to those for mutual funds and would require that:
In addition, a contract summary prospectus may not be bound together with any other materials except for summary and statutory prospectuses of portfolio companies, provided that those portfolio companies are available investment options for the investor to whom the materials are sent or given and the materials include a table of contents identifying each portfolio company prospectus included and the page on which it may be found. The SEC requests comment on the conditions in the VIP Summary Prospectus Rule regarding the online availability of the required online VIP documents.
The Proposal includes a new delivery option that would satisfy portfolio companies’ prospectus delivery obligations through a “notice and access” approach. The Proposal provides that VIP issuers that provide investors with a contract summary prospectus would not be required to include prospectuses of the underlying portfolio companies if certain conditions are met.[9] Under the optional delivery method, there would be no affirmative obligation to deliver prospectuses of underlying portfolio companies, absent an investor request for delivery in paper or electronically.[10]
Under this delivery option, the VIP issuer would be required to include certain key information about the portfolio companies available under the contract in an appendix to the contract’s summary prospectus (as discussed above), and must make the summary and statutory prospectuses for the portfolio companies available online at the website address specified on or hyperlinked in the VIP summary prospectus. This approach would satisfy the portfolio companies’ prospectus delivery obligations if: (1) an initial summary prospectus is used for each currently offered VIP described under the related registration statement; (2) a summary prospectus is used for the portfolio company; and (3) the portfolio company’s current summary prospectus, statutory prospectus, SAI, and most recent shareholder reports are posted online under similar posting requirements for the VIP’s summary prospectuses and other documents. These documents would be subject to similar online formatting and accessibility requirements as mutual fund summary prospectuses under Rule 498, but the Proposal would require the documents to be posted at the same website address as the VIP materials that appear online. If a portfolio company amends or supplements its prospectus between annual updates, the updated prospectus must be posted online.
The SEC requests comment on several aspects of the new delivery option for portfolio company prospectuses, including, among others, whether: (1) to permit the use of the new option if a portfolio company does not use a summary prospectus; (2) portfolio company documents should be required to be posted at the same website address as the VIP materials; (3) the separate requirements of Rule 498 regarding mutual fund summary prospectus documents create any confusion that should be addressed by the VIP Summary Prospectus Rule; and (4) interim portfolio company prospectus supplements should be required to be delivered to investors.
Dorothy M. Donohue
Deputy General Counsel - Securities Regulation
Sarah A. Bessin
Associate General Counsel
[1] SEC Release Nos. 33-10569, 34-84508 and IC-33286 (Oct. 30, 2018), available at https://www.sec.gov/rules/proposed/2018/33-10569.pdf (“Proposing Release”).
[2] Notably, the VIP Summary Prospectus Rule would not permit incorporation by reference of any other information. See Proposed Rule 498A(d).
[3] An initial summary prospectus may, however, describe more than one class of a contract. Id. at 33. This is similar to a mutual fund summary prospectus, which “may describe only one [f]und, but may describe more than one [c]lass of a [f]und.” Rule 498(b)(4).
[4] Among other things, the Key Information Table would require VIP registrants to disclose minimum and maximum annual fees for portfolio company fees and expense, using the gross expense ratio disclosed in fee table of the portfolio company’s current prospectus.
[5] Proposed Rule 498A(b). The Proposing Release includes an appendix with a hypothetical initial summary prospectus. See Proposing Release at Appendix A.
[6] Proposed Rule 498A(c).
[7] Proposing Release at 104. The Proposing Release indicates, for example, that stating merely that a fee has changed in not sufficient. Rather, the updating summary prospectus should disclose that the fee has changed from 1.5% to 1.7%. Id.
[8] See Proposing Release at Appendix B.
[9] This new option would be available to Form N-4 and Form N-6 registrants, but would not be available to Form N-3 registrants because they do not have underlying portfolio companies.
[10] See Proposed Rule 498A(j)(1)(iii).
Latest Comment Letters:
TEST - ICI Comment Letter Opposing Sales Tax on Additional Services in Maryland
ICI Comment Letter Opposing Sales Tax on Additional Services in Maryland
ICI Response to the European Commission on the Savings and Investments Union