
Fundamentals for Newer Directors 2014 (pdf)
The latest edition of ICI’s flagship publication shares a wealth of research and data on trends in the investment company industry.
[31029]
January 17, 2018 TO: Broker/Dealer Advisory Committee
Last week, FINRA published its 2018 Regulatory and Examination Priority Letter.[1] FINRA’s Letter included a cover letter from its President and CEO, Robert Cook. The cover letter noted that the areas discussed in FINRA’s Letter are those that “member firms may wish to consider as they identify opportunities to improve their compliance, supervisory and risk management programs.” The cover letter also “reflects briefly on how FINRA is working to become a more efficient and more effective self-regulatory organization.”[2]
FINRA’s Letter is organized into three sections: (1) the five areas that FINRA will focus on when it reviews members’ operations over the coming year;[3] (2) “Report Cards;” and (3) new rules. While the letter’s discussion under these heading is briefly summarized below, the areas of focus that may be of interest to mutual funds are:
The following is a summary of the contents of FINRA’s Letter.
As FINRA inspects its members this year, it will be focused on these areas:
FINRA’s Letter explains that FINRA plans to launch “several new report cards to assist firms with their compliance efforts.” It will also review how members are using FINRA’s Report Cards. FINRA’s new report cards are:
FINRA also plans to review how members are implementing the following new regulatory requirements that will become effective in 2018:
Tamara K. Salmon
Associate General Counsel
[1] See 2018 Regulatory and Examination Priorities Letter, FINRA (January 8, 2016) (“FINRA’s Letter”), which is available at: http://www.finra.org/industry/2018-regulatory-and-examination-priorities-letter. As you may know, the SEC’s National Examination Program, too, annually publishes the priorities for the SEC’s Office of Compliance Inspections and Examination. As of the date of this memo, the NEP has not yet published its priorities. We will let you know when they do.
[2] The issues Mr. Cook mentioned in his reflection include: FINRA360, which is FINRA’s comprehensive self-evaluation and organizational improvement initiative; consolidating FINRA’s enforcement function into a single unit; making FINRA’s Advisory Committees more transparent; new retrospective rule reviews; establishing Innovation Outreach to foster an ongoing dialogue with the securities industry to help FINRA better understand technological innovations; implementing a risk-based examination framework; enhancing the training of examiners; making more tools and information available to members to help them with their compliance efforts; and publishing an Examination Findings Report to share information with members about FINRA’s examination programs.
[3] These five areas are fraud, high-risk firms and brokers, operational and financial risks, sales practice risks, and market integrity.
[4] FINRA published an Examination Findings Report on “Product Suitability” in December 2017. This Report, which summarized issues relating to suitability that FINRA’s examiners found when examining members, is available on FINRA’s website at: http://www.finra.org/industry/2017-report-exam-findings/product-suitability. This Report included the following:
“FINRA identified instances in which customers were advised to roll their UIT investments over early, and firms did not have appropriate supervisory mechanisms in place to identify and review the suitability of the recommendation.”
“Some firms FINRA reviewed failed to adequately identify short-term UIT trading activity as an area of potential abuse by registered representatives, and did not implement adequate internal controls to identify potentially problematic UIT trading activity.”
“FINRA observed situations where firms: (1) recommended a higher-fee share class without a reasonable basis to believe that the recommendation was suitable or (2) recommended a complex product without a reasonable basis to believe the product was suitable in light of the customer’s risk tolerance and investment time horizon. At one firm, for example, FINRA observed that, in a sample of short-term surrender variable annuity transactions, over 50 percent of customers had a long-term investment time horizon.”
[5] The four areas of due diligence are: (1) customer identification and verification; (2) beneficial ownership identification and verification; (3) understanding the nature and purpose of customer relationships; and (4) ongoing monitoring for reporting suspicious transactions and, on a risk basis, maintaining and updating customer information.
Latest Comment Letters:
TEST - ICI Comment Letter Opposing Sales Tax on Additional Services in Maryland
ICI Comment Letter Opposing Sales Tax on Additional Services in Maryland
ICI Response to the European Commission on the Savings and Investments Union