September 16, 1991
TO: SEC RULES COMMITTEE NO. 56-91
RE: "FINANCIAL FRAUD DETECTION AND DISCLOSURE ACT"; ACCOUNTING
PROVISIONS IN HOUSE ENERGY AND COMMERCE COMMITTEE FINANCIAL
SERVICES RESTRUCTURING BILL
__________________________________________________________
On August 1, 1991, Congressmen Wyden and Markey introduced
H.R. 3159, the "Financial Fraud Detection and Disclosure Act".
The provisions of this bill are described below. A copy of the
bill is attached.
The first section of H.R. 3159 specifies certain procedures
that an independent public accountant would be required to follow
in performing an annual audit of an issuer covered by the
legislation. These would include (1) procedures designed to
detect illegal acts and identify related party transactions that
are material to the financial statements and (2) an evaluation of
whether there is substantial doubt about an issuer's ability to
continue as a going concern. The bill provides that these
procedures are to be included in an audit "in accordance with
methods prescribed by the [Securities and Exchange] Commission."
The next section of H.R. 3159 concerns the responsibilities
of an independent accountant, who becomes aware that an illegal
act has occurred, to (1) determine the possible effect of the
illegal act on the issuer's financial statements and (2) promptly
inform the issuer's management and audit committee (or board in
the absence of an audit committee) of the illegal act. As with
the audit requirements described above, these actions are to be
taken "in accordance with methods prescribed by the Commission."
The next section of the bill authorizes the Commission to
require reports from public accountants under certain
circumstances, "upon reasonable belief that material illegal acts
may have been or are being committed by a registrant or employees
of a registrant." This provision specifies that the registrant
must pay the expense of providing any such report.
The following section of H.R. 3159 directs the SEC to
furnish to Congress, within six months of enactment of the
legislation, a study evaluating (1) the extent of compliance with
the requirements described above regarding disclosure of illegal
acts and (2) the extent to which a requirement for annual reports
by management and a registrant's independent public accountant on
the adequacy of the registrant's internal control structure would
improve such compliance and the reliability of the registrant's
financial statements.
Finally, the bill provides that, with respect to fiscal
years beginning before January 1, 1996, an independent public
accountant shall not be liable to any person for findings,
conclusions, reports and statements made in good faith in
complying with the requirements of the bill regarding detection
and disclosure of illegal acts.
* * * *
Provisions similar to those described above are included in
the House Energy and Commerce Committee's substitute for H.R. 6
(the House Banking Committee's financial services restructuring
bill) and are also attached. However, there are certain
significant differences. Most notably, the Energy and Commerce
provisions contain a section limiting their applicability to
insured depository institutions or affiliates of insured
depository institutions only.
In addition, the Energy and Commerce legislation does not
contain (1) the section of H.R. 3159 described above permitting
the SEC to require reports from auditors upon reasonable belief
that material illegal acts may have been committed, (2) the
provision for an SEC study on internal control structures or (3)
the section limiting the liability of an independent public
accountant for findings, conclusions, reports or statements made
in good faith in connection with complying with the legislation.
If you have any comments or concerns about the potential
impact of H.R. 3159 or the accounting provisions in the Energy
and Commerce Committee's substitute for H.R. 6 on your firm,
please contact the undersigned at 202/955-3514 or in my absence
Craig Tyle at 202/955-3522.
Frances M. Stadler
Assistant General Counsel
Attachment
Latest Comment Letters:
TEST - ICI Comment Letter Opposing Sales Tax on Additional Services in Maryland
ICI Comment Letter Opposing Sales Tax on Additional Services in Maryland
ICI Response to the European Commission on the Savings and Investments Union