July 1, 1991
TO: TAX MEMBERS NO. 24-91
OPERATIONS MEMBERS NO. 16-91
ACCOUNTING/TREASURERS MEMBERS NO. 15-91
RE: BILL INTRODUCED TO REPEAL 30 PERCENT TEST, PROVIDE
SHAREHOLDER BASIS REPORTING AND CLARIFY TREATMENT OF
REIMBURSED EXPENSES
__________________________________________________________
The attached bill to (1) repeal the 30 percent test of
Internal Revenue Code section 851(b)(3), (2) provide shareholder
basis reporting and (3) clarify the treatment of reimbursed
expenses under Code section 851(b)(2) was introduced late
yesterday by Chairman Rostenkowski of the House Ways and Means
Committee and several others, including the ranking minority
member on the Committee, Congressman Archer. Also attached is
Chairman Rostenkowski's statement upon introduction of the bill,
which includes a description of the bill's provisions.
Section 1 of the bill would repeal the 30 percent test of
Code section 851(b)(3) for taxable years ending after the bill's
date of enactment.
Section 2 of the bill would amend the reporting
requirements of Code section 6045 to impose upon mutual funds and
brokers, that are presently required to report gross proceeds on
sales or exchanges of mutual fund shares, the obligation to
provide to shareholders and the Internal Revenue Service ("IRS")
average cost basis information for shares redeemed. Consistent
with the current reporting requirements of Code section 6045,
basis information would be provided to shareholders by January
31, and to the IRS by the last day in February, of the year
following the year of redemption. This reporting requirement
would apply, however, only to accounts opened on or after January
1, 1993.
The average cost information would be provided using the
"single-category" method, which computes the average cost for all
of the taxpayer's shares and then determines the holding period
of shares sold on a first-in, first-out basis. Regulatory
authority is provided to determine the manner in which basis and
holding periods would be reported. Such authoritywould include
- 2 -
the authority to require funds and brokers to take into account
wash sales, return of capital distributions and other events that
might affect a basis calculation.
All basis calculations would be done on an account-by-
account basis. Funds and brokers would not be required to
provide average cost information for any account that contains
shares acquired other than by purchase (such as by gift or
inheritance). Any broker that holds fund shares as a nominee for
another person and transfers the shares to another broker would,
however, be required to provide cost basis information to the
second broker.
The cost basis provisions of Code section 1012 would be
amended to require fund shareholders to use the cost basis
information provided in calculating gain or loss on the sale of
fund shares, unless the shareholder elected in the year of the
first redemption from the account to use another cost basis
method (either first-in, first-out or specific identification).
Under the bill, shareholders could elect different cost basis
methods for different accounts in the same fund.
Special rules are also provided regarding the information
reporting penalty provisions of Code sections 6721 through 6724.
First, the bill provides that the amount "required to be
reported" for purposes of determining the penalty for intentional
disregard of reporting requirements would be computed without
regard to basis amounts reported. Second, the explanation of
provisions indicates that the reasonable cause exception of Code
section 6724 is intended to prevent funds from being penalized
for filing information reports by January 31 that contain basis
information that must be "corrected" because of certain wash
sales. Specifically, where the redemption of fund shares occurs
in December and the acquisition of fund shares occurs in January
of the subsequent year, the reasonable cause waiver will apply so
long as "corrected" information returns are provided to the
shareholder no later than the last day of February (which is also
the date by which the information must be filed with the IRS).
Section 3 of the bill would amend the 90 percent qualifying
income test of Code section 851(b)(2) to provide that any
reimbursement (or other payment) with respect to the fund's
expenses will be disregarded in determining qualification under
that section. Thus, under the bill, a fund would not be
disqualified under Code section 851(b)(2) whether fees are
limited by expense reimbursements or by an advance negotiation
which does not result in any gross income to the fund. The
accompanying explanation to the bill indicates that no inference
is intended with respect to the treatment of reimbursed expenses
under present law. This provision would apply to taxable years
ending after the bill's date of enactment.
- 3 -
We will keep you informed of developments regarding this
legislation.
Keith D. Lawson
Associate Counsel - Tax
Attachments
Latest Comment Letters:
TEST - ICI Comment Letter Opposing Sales Tax on Additional Services in Maryland
ICI Comment Letter Opposing Sales Tax on Additional Services in Maryland
ICI Response to the European Commission on the Savings and Investments Union