
Fundamentals for Newer Directors 2014 (pdf)
The latest edition of ICI’s flagship publication shares a wealth of research and data on trends in the investment company industry.
Stay informed of the policy priorities ICI champions on behalf of the asset management industry and individual investors.
Explore research from ICI’s experts on industry-related developments, trends, and policy issues.
Explore expert resources, analysis, and opinions on key topics affecting the asset management industry.
Read ICI’s latest publications, press releases, statements, and blog posts.
See ICI’s upcoming and past events.
The latest edition of ICI’s flagship publication shares a wealth of research and data on trends in the investment company industry.
Explore expert resources, analysis, and opinions on key topics affecting the asset management industry.
Read ICI’s latest publications, press releases, statements, and blog posts.
See ICI’s upcoming and past events.
ICI Innovate brings together multidisciplinary experts to explore how emerging technologies will impact fund operations and their implications for the broader industry.
ICI Innovate is participating in the Emerging Leaders initiative, offering a heavily discounted opportunity for the next generation of asset management professionals to participate in ICI’s programming.
The Emerging.
Stay informed of the policy priorities ICI champions on behalf of the asset management industry and individual investors.
Explore research from ICI’s experts on industry-related developments, trends, and policy issues.
Explore expert resources, analysis, and opinions on key topics affecting the asset management industry.
Read ICI’s latest publications, press releases, statements, and blog posts.
See ICI’s upcoming and past events.
[28079]
May 1, 2014
TO: CLOSED-END INVESTMENT COMPANY COMMITTEE No. 17-14
Recently, the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) proposed to amend Rule 17Ad-22 and adopt Rule 17Ab2-2 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 to establish standards for the operation and governance of registered clearing agencies that meet the definition of a “covered clearing agency.” [1] Covered clearing agencies would include registered clearing agencies that (1) have been designated as systemically important by the Financial Stability Oversight Council (“FSOC”) and for which the SEC is the supervisory agency; [2] (2) provide central counterparty (“CCP”) services for security-based (“SB”) swaps or are involved in activities the SEC determines to be a more complex risk profile, where in either case the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (“CFTC”) is not the supervisory agency for such clearing agency; or (3) are otherwise determined to be covered clearing agencies by the SEC pursuant to procedures under proposed Rule 17Ab2-2.
We have prepared a draft comment letter in response to the Proposal, which is attached. We plan to file this letter before the May 27 comment period deadline. If you have comments on the draft letter, please provide them to Jennifer Choi at jennifer.choi@ici.org by Monday, May 12.
Under the Proposal, the SEC proposes to establish requirements for covered clearing agencies with respect to general organization, financial risk management, settlement, central securities depositories and exchange-of-value-settlement systems, default management, segregation and portability, general business risk and operational risk management, access, efficiency, and transparency. For these requirements, the SEC generally proposes to require a covered clearing agency to establish, implement, maintain, and enforce written policies and procedures in the areas enumerated above.
The draft comment letter expresses significant and serious concerns with the Commission’s approach in the Proposal particularly for the requirements on segregation and portability. The Commission does not define how the clearing regime and posting of margin are expected to operate, both in the normal course of business and in the event of a clearing member bankruptcy. Rather, the Commission leaves these important decisions and the determination of the type of protections provided by asset segregation and related safeguards to clearing agencies that clear SB swaps. The letter disagrees with the Commission that risks posed by covered clearing agencies can be sufficiently mitigated by providing them with broad discretion to adopt policies and procedures in these areas.
The letter requests that the Commission propose to adopt minimum structural and operational requirements for clearing agencies that are tailored to the way in which the SB swaps market operate. Specifically, with respect to the protection of cleared SB swap collateral posted by customers, the letter urges the Commission to propose to require SB swap clearing agencies to provide, at a minimum, the protection provided by the model adopted by the CFTC for cleared swaps collateral. The letter also provides some comments with regard to the tools that covered clearing agencies should be permitted to use to “recover” during times of stress and the governance of covered clearing agencies.
Jennifer S. Choi
Senior Associate Counsel Securities Regulation
[1] Standards for Covered Clearing Agencies, 79 FR 16865 (Mar. 26, 2014), available at http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2014-03-26/pdf/2014-05806.pdf (“Proposal”). For a summary of the Proposal, see ICI Memorandum No. 27991 (March 27, 2014), available at http://www.ici.org/my_ici/memorandum/memo27991.
[2] In 2012, FSOC designated as systemically important the following clearing agencies: CME, The Depository Trust Company (“DTC”), Fixed Income Clearing Corporation (“FICC”), ICE, National Securities Clearing Corporation (“NSCC”), and the Options Clearing Corporation (“OCC”). The SEC is the supervisory agency for DTC, FICC, NSCC and OCC.
Latest Comment Letters:
TEST - ICI Comment Letter Opposing Sales Tax on Additional Services in Maryland
ICI Comment Letter Opposing Sales Tax on Additional Services in Maryland
ICI Response to the European Commission on the Savings and Investments Union