
Fundamentals for Newer Directors 2014 (pdf)
The latest edition of ICI’s flagship publication shares a wealth of research and data on trends in the investment company industry.
[27600]
September 30, 2013
TO: ICI GLOBAL TRADING & MARKET STRUCTURE COMMITTEE No. 2-13
On August 12, 2013, the Australian Securities & Investments Commission (“ASIC”) released new market integrity rules on dark liquidity and high frequency trading, as well as guidance on the rules that clarifies ASIC’s expectations of market operators and participants. [1] The rules follow a public consultation on these issues by ASIC, on which ICI and ICI Global commented. [2] ASIC initially adopted market integrity rules that are common to markets trading in equity market products admitted to quotation on ASX to deal with issues relating to the introduction of competition between exchange markets in 2011. To further mitigate issues that arise as a result of multiple exchange markets and crossing systems, ASIC has adopted these new market integrity rules in relation to crossing systems in products able to be traded on the ASX, ASX 24 and Chi-X markets. The rule changes become effective in stages over the following nine months.
Described below are the key changes that were adopted in August 2013.
Recognizing that the information currently made available by crossing system operators to the market varies greatly in its details and that it is not necessarily provided in a timely or consistent manner, ASIC adopted new requirements regarding transparency and disclosure. In our comment letter, ICI and ICI Global generally expressed support for the proposed disclosure changes, explaining that it is critical for users and prospective users to be informed of how their orders may be handled and executed.
To ensure that users are treated in a fair and impartial manner and that retail clients are treated fairly compared to wholesale and principal users, ASIC adopted provisions regarding the fair treatment of all users of a crossing system, which ICI and ICI Global support. Specifically:
Because ASIC has no visibility of orders resting in or passing through crossing systems and is therefore unable to monitor such activity, ASIC has adopted rules imposing specific obligations on crossing systems operators to monitor activity in their crossing systems and to maintain records of such monitoring, for which ICI and ICI Global expressed support.
In particular:
To address concerns with the proliferation of crossing systems and their potential systemic importance, ASIC has adopted efficiency and integrity controls for crossing system operators. ICI and ICI Global have expressed support for trading control mechanisms in the United States and Europe and similarly expressed support for ASIC’s proposals.
ASIC adopted the following changes:
To address its concerns that market participants are not adequately identifying or managing all conflicts of interest that arise in their off-market trading, ASIC has supplemented its conflicts of interest rules.
In its review of high frequency trading, ASIC noted that some trading practices are of concern and may be predatory (e.g., layering, quote stuffing, latency arbitrage) and proposed certain changes to address manipulative trading practices that may be effected through trading algorithms. While ICI and ICI Global supported ASIC’s initiatives to address trading practices that may be considered manipulative or predatory in nature, we expressed reservations about proposals regarding a minimum resting time or order-to-trade ratios. We are pleased that ASIC has not adopted requirements for a minimum resting time or order-to-trade ratios at this time.
ASIC has, however, adopted the changes below:
Eva M. Mykolenko
Associate Counsel - International Affairs
[1]ASIC’s press release with link to the various market integrity rules and Regulatory Guide 223 Guidance on ASIC market integrity for competition in exchange markets can be found at: http://www.asic.gov.au/asic/asic.nsf/byheadline/13-213MR+ASIC+makes+rules+on+dark+liquidity%2C+high-frequency+trading?openDocument.
[2] The letter, dated May 10, 2013, is available at http://www.iciglobal.org/pdf/13_ici_icig_asic_hft.pdf.
Latest Comment Letters:
TEST - ICI Comment Letter Opposing Sales Tax on Additional Services in Maryland
ICI Comment Letter Opposing Sales Tax on Additional Services in Maryland
ICI Response to the European Commission on the Savings and Investments Union