Memo #
24195

Draft ICI Comment Letter on SEC Proposal Relating to Market Access Arrangements

| Print

 

 

[24195]

 

March 25, 2010

TO: EQUITY MARKETS ADVISORY COMMITTEE No. 9-10
SEC RULES COMMITTEE No. 13-10
CLOSED-END INVESTMENT COMPANY COMMITTEE No. 6-10
ETF (EXCHANGE-TRADED FUNDS) COMMITTEE No. 5-10
ETF ADVISORY COMMITTEE No. 8-10
RISK MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE No. 5-10     RE: DRAFT ICI COMMENT LETTER ON SEC PROPOSAL RELATING TO MARKET ACCESS ARRANGEMENTS

 

As we previously informed you, the SEC has published for comment new Rule 15c3-5 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. [1]  The proposed rule would require brokers-dealers with access to trading directly on an exchange or alternative trading system (“ATS”) to implement risk management controls and supervisory procedures reasonably designed to manage the financial, regulatory, and other risks associated with such access. 

The Institute has prepared the attached draft comment letter on the SEC’s proposal.  Comments on the proposal are due to the SEC on Monday, March 29.  If you have comments on the attached draft letter, please provide them to Ari Burstein by e-mail at aburstein@ici.org or by phone at 202-371-5408 by March 29. 

The draft letter states that while the Institute supports the goals of the SEC’s proposal, we are concerned that several requirements of the proposal, if implemented without certain changes or clarification, could lead to unintended consequences for funds and other institutional investors using market access arrangements, particularly regarding the confidentiality of trading information.  The draft letter notes that when funds use market access arrangements they, like other market participants, do so, in large part, to avoid the handling of their orders by the trading desks of broker-dealers so as not to impart trading information to these desks and, in general, to seek anonymity of their trading interest.  The draft letter states that this anonymity could be damaged by the pre-trade and post-trade controls and procedures that would be mandated by the proposal.   

For example, the draft letter discusses the proposed rule’s requirement that broker-dealer controls and procedures assure that appropriate surveillance personnel receive immediate post-trade execution reports that result from market access that would identify the applicable customer associated with each such execution report.  The draft letter states that requirements of this kind could impair the confidentiality of fund trading information and could enable the trading personnel of a broker-dealer to deconstruct the trading methodologies of funds provided with market access.  The letter notes that a similar concern arises with respect to the pre-trade controls that would be required by the rule where a broker-dealer’s controls must prevent the entry of orders that exceed pre-set credit or capital thresholds for each customer as there is a potential for leakage of information to non-compliance staff at broker-dealers who establish the required controls. 

To address these concerns, the draft letter recommends that, at the very least: (1) unless expressly authorized to the contrary by a customer, access to information regarding a market access customer’s orders and trades necessary to comply with the rule be limited to broker-dealer compliance personnel directly associated with overseeing market access controls and procedures; (2) that the information required to be disclosed must be relevant to specific risk concerns created by market access; and (3) that the SEC make clear that broker-dealers who obtain information to comply with the rule also have adequate confidentiality safeguards and controls in place to protect such information and that the information be used exclusively for regulatory purposes.

 

Ari Burstein
Senior Counsel - Securities Regulation

 

Attachment (in .pdf format)

 

endnotes

 [1] Securities Exchange Act Release No. 34-61379 (January 19, 2010), 75 FR 4007 (January 26, 2010) (“Release”).