December 24, 1990
TO: ACCOUNTING/TREASURERS COMMITTEE NO. 40-90
BROKER/DEALER ADVISORY COMMITTEE NO. 49-90
TRANSFER AGENT ADVISORY COMMITTEE NO. 57-90
GROUP OF THIRTY TASK FORCE
RE: EFFECTS TO MUTUAL FUND INDUSTRY OF PROPOSED CHANGES
TO U.S. SETTLEMENT PRACTICES
__________________________________________________________
As you know, the U.S. Working Committee ("USWC") was
established to review the Group of Thirty's ("G30") nine
recommendations for worldwide, standardized settlement conventions
against current U.S. market practices. Most of you received the
landscape document prepared by the USWC which outlines the G30
recommendations.
The USWC met with the SEC at a roundtable on November 27, 1990
to present the following proposals for change to the U.S. securities
markets, which are based on the G30 recommendations:
o By 1992, settlements and other movements of corporate and
municipal securities must be effected only by book-entry
movements within a depository for transactions among
financial intermediaries (brokers, dealers, and banks) and
between financial intermediaries and their institutional
clients.
o By 1992, all new corporate or municipal securities issued
must be eligible for depository processing, and procedures
have to be developed to monitor inappropriate sale
transactions during new issue stabilization periods.
o In 1992, all payments for settlements among financial
intermediaries and their institutional customers should be
made using same-day funds. This would also apply to
payments associated with dividends, interest, redemptions,
and reorganizations. The 1992 time frame is subject to
validation as implementation plans are developed.
o By 1993, settlements of corporate and municipal securities
must be effected on T+3 only by book-entry for all market
participants. Alternatives to the immobilization of
-2-
of assets of retail customers at financial intermediaries
will need to be in place prior to the implementation of
book-entry settlement. The USWC proposed a direct
registration system for assets of retail customers.
At the roundtable, the SEC asked the USWC to continue their efforts
by specifically focusing on certain difficult areas of the
proposals.
The Institute anticipates that the mutual fund industry will
inevitably be called upon by the SEC to comment on the USWC's
proposals. As such, the Institute's Group of Thirty Task Force
("GTTF"), a sub-committee of the Accounting/Treasurers Committee,
was formed and had its first meeting on December 4th to discuss the
effects to the mutual fund industry of the USWC's proposals.
At the meeting, the GTTF determined that the first step in
analyzing this issue is to create a list of questions that need to
be addressed by the task force with the appropriate entities
including fund complexes, DTC, custodian banks, broker/dealers,
transfer agents, the USWC and others. The Task Force plans to meet
with a representation of the above groups to solicit their responses
to the questions that are developed.
The attached sample list of questions was compiled based on
the discussion at the December 4th GTTF meeting and the written
comments of two Institute members. The list of questions has been
divided into two categories: "Portfolio Transactions" and "Capital
Transactions". Within those categories sub-headings appear which
indicate to whom the questions will be addressed.
Please review the list of questions and add those items that
you would like to see included. Feel free to improve or expand on
the questions already listed. Please return your comments to the
undersigned by January 4, 1991. If you have any questions, please
call me at 202/955-3547. We hope to schedule a number of visits
beginning in mid-January 1991. We are discussing matters with DTC
and will communicate with a follow-up memorandum shortly.
Thank you for your assistance in developing the industry
"question list."
Diane Butler
Director - Operations/
Fund Custody
Attachment
Latest Comment Letters:
TEST - ICI Comment Letter Opposing Sales Tax on Additional Services in Maryland
ICI Comment Letter Opposing Sales Tax on Additional Services in Maryland
ICI Response to the European Commission on the Savings and Investments Union