- 1 -
November 30, 1990
TO: TAX MEMBERS NO. 52-90
ACCOUNTING/TREASURERS MEMBERS NO. 26-90
INTERNATIONAL FUNDS TASK FORCE NO. 29-90
RE: UNITED KINGDOM AGREES TO REFUND DIVIDENDS WITHHELD
TO MASSACHUSETTS BUSINESS TRUSTS
__________________________________________________________
We are pleased to inform you that the United Kingdom
("U.K.") Inland Revenue has consented, subject to the conditions
set forth in the attached exchange of letters, to permit
regulated investment companies ("RICs") organized as
Massachusetts business trusts ("MBTs") to receive refunds of tax
withheld in excess of the 15 percent rate provided by the U.S.-
U.K. Income Tax Treaty for dividends paid by U.K. companies. As
you may know, the Institute and three custodian banks (Brown
Brothers Harriman & Company, Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A., and
State Street Bank and Trust Co.) have been jointly negotiating
with Inland Revenue for over a year to convince Inland Revenue to
refund these monies to the MBTs; the group met once with Inland
Revenue in London, met several times with the Internal Revenue
Service in Washington, submitted several memoranda to Inland
Revenue and, later, to IRS and had numerous telephone conferences
with each government agency. (See, e.g., Institute Memorandum to
Tax Committee No. 22-90, Accounting/Treasurers Committee No. 25-
90, Independent Accountants Advisory Committee and International
Funds Task Force No. 18-90, dated August 13, 1990.)
As the attached letters indicate, Inland Revenue's consent
to permit MBTs to reclaim the taxes withheld is subject to three
conditions. The reason for the conditions is that Inland Revenue
continues to hold its legal position that the MBT's shareholders,
rather than the MBTs themselves, are the beneficial owners of the
dividends and that, consequently, only the shareholders may
request the refunds. Inland Revenue has decided to treat the
MBTs as the shareholders' agents and permit them to receive the
reclaims, however, to effect the Treaty's purpose to permit one
country's residents to invest in another country through pooled
investment vehicles and receive the benefits of the applicable
tax treaty. The industry has agreed to accept the refunds
- 2 -
subject to the conditions, but without prejudice to our legal
position (which we continue to hold) that the MBTs themselves are
the beneficial owners of the dividends.
The Three Conditions
The three conditions imposed by Inland Revenue on the
payment of reclaims to RICs organized as MBTs are as follows:
First, Inland Revenue will reduce reclaims paid to an MBT
by any amount previously paid to a shareholder in that MBT with
respect to the same claim. However, Inland Revenue will oppose
any claim filed by a shareholder if the MBT has already received
payment on that claim.
Second, Inland Revenue may change its position permitting
MBTs to file reclaims if the United States changes its position
and no longer permits U.K. collective investment schemes (e.g.,
unit trusts) to receive the treaty benefits provided to
beneficial owners of securities. The United States is not,
however, a party on our agreement and need not provide any
certification or other communication to the Inland Revenue on
this point.
Third, Inland Revenue may change its position permitting
MBTs to file reclaims if there is a material increase in the
number of shareholders in MBTs (on an industry-wide, rather than
fund-by-fund, basis) that are not U.S. residents for Treaty
purposes. To satisfy itself that this third condition continues
to be satisfied, Inland Revenue may request information directly
from individual funds regarding the number and percentage of
nonresident alien shareholders, but only to confirm that
nonresidents continue to constitute a small percentage of MBT
shareholders. If Inland Revenue makes such a request to a
particular fund, they will also notify the Institute of the
request so that we may ensure that the Inland Revenue receives
information it requests and thereby remains satisfied that the
number/percentage of foreign shareholders is not increasing
materially.
Before these three conditions were agreed to, the Institute
reviewed the proposal with a large number of Institute members.
The unanimous conclusion of the group was that the industry
should accept Inland Revenue's proposal and its three conditions,
notwithstanding the merits of our legal position and the
possibility that at some future time the second or third
condition may cause the reclaim issue to be reopened. Further,
the members acknowledged their responsibilities to provide
shareholder information in the future to ensure that the
agreement with Inland Revenue remains in effect.
- 3 -
Procedure for Receiving Reclaims
We understand from Inland Revenue that (1) MBTs with
pending claims that have not been rejected will have their
reclaims processed "as quickly as possible"; (2) MBTs with
pending claims that have been rejected must resubmit their
claims; and (3) MBTs that have not yet filed claims should do so
now.
* * * * *
We will keep you informed of developments.
Keith D. Lawson
Associate General Counsel
Attachment
KDL:bmb
Latest Comment Letters:
TEST - ICI Comment Letter Opposing Sales Tax on Additional Services in Maryland
ICI Comment Letter Opposing Sales Tax on Additional Services in Maryland
ICI Response to the European Commission on the Savings and Investments Union