
Fundamentals for Newer Directors 2014 (pdf)
The latest edition of ICI’s flagship publication shares a wealth of research and data on trends in the investment company industry.
[22442]
April 18, 2008
TO: PENSION MEMBERS No. 24-08
By a party line vote, the House Education and Labor Committee approved a chairman’s substitute of H.R. 3185, the “401(k) Fair Disclosure for Retirement Security Act of 2008.” The Committee approved one amendment to the chairman’s substitute related to the mandated index fund requirement. Copies of the chairman’s substitute and amendment are attached.
The chairman’s substitute differs in a number of respects from the original bill introduced by Chairman Miller in July 2007 and incorporates some elements of S. 2473, introduced in the Senate by Senators Harkin and Kohl in December 2007. [1]
The Institute sent a letter to Representative George Miller, Chairman of the Committee, stating that, because the bill goes beyond disclosure and will distort a highly competitive and successful marketplace, the Institute cannot support the bill in its current form. (The letter was sent prior to the Committee’s mark-up and stated concerns the Institute expected based on information about what would be in the chairman’s substitute.) The Institute also joined a letter signed by the American Council of Life Insurers, the Financial Services Roundtable, the Financial Services Forum, the Investment Adviser Association, and the Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association opposing the bill.
The bill would prohibit a plan administrator of an individual account plan [2] from contracting with a service provider unless the plan administrator receives, at least ten business days in advance, a single written statement which describes the services that will be provided to the plan in connection with the contract and provides the expected total annual charges and an allocation of those total annual charges among four components. The offering of an investment option to a plan is specifically included as a contract for services covered by the bill.
This disclosure requirement applies only if the total charged for services equals or exceeds $5,000. [3] The Department of Labor may specify a lesser threshold for small plans and a greater threshold for other plans.
The total annual charges must be allocated into four components:
The annual charges for plan administration and recordkeeping and investment management must be presented as an aggregate total dollar amount (and also may be presented as a percentage of assets). Transaction-based charges may be presented either as dollar amount or as a percentage of the “applicable base amounts.” Reasonable estimates may be used but must be based on the previous year’s experience.
Service providers may rely on information given by an unaffiliated person regulated by the Federal government or a state unless the service provider knows or has reason to know the information is inaccurate or incomplete or has notice of facts that would prompt a reasonable service provider to inquire into the accuracy or completeness of the information.
The single written statement must include a number of disclosures regarding conflicts of interest, share class, and discounted services:
Under the bill, every contract for services must require that the service provider provide an updated written statement describing any material change as soon as reasonable after the change is known. The contract must provide that the single written statement is provided at least annually (even if there has been no material change during the year).
The bill provides that nothing in the law shall be construed to require any service provider to provide any services and provides that nothing in the law affects the obligations of plan sponsors and fiduciaries under ERISA’s fiduciary rules.
The bill would require the plan administrator of a participant-directed individual account plan to provide information on investment options and fees at least ten business days prior to the date of a participant’s initial investment (or the effective date of any material change in investment options). [5] The notice also must be provided each plan year. The notice may be combined with the default investment notice required by ERISA § 404(c)(5). The notice must specify which components of charges for each investment option are payable by the participant and how these components will be paid.
For each available investment option, the notice must provide:
The plan administrator must include a plan fee comparison chart comparing actual service and investment charges (including charges for the “offering of an investment option”) that will or could be assessed against the account of the participant with respect to a plan year. The fees listed on the comparison chart must be in the form of a dollar amount (although percentage of assets may also be listed). The chart must include examples that demonstrate how the charges will be assessed against the account of the participant and any other information DOL determines necessary to permit participants to assess the services for which charges will or could be assessed.
The comparison chart must provide information in relation to four categories of charges:
In addition, each charge must be described by whether it is for investment management, transactions, plan administration and recordkeeping, or other identified services. The fee comparison chart must include the amount of fees assessed in connection with each investment option and a history of returns derived net of fees and expenses, for the previous year, five years, and ten years (or since inception).
Reasonable and representative estimates for the information required above are allowed, as long as they are identified as estimates and based on the previous year’s experience.
DOL is required to prescribe regulations identifying (and establishing separate rules, if necessary, to identify) any investment options that provide a guaranteed rate of return and that do not identify specific fees.
The chairman’s substitute added new (and very broad) definitions, which apply to both the service provider and participant disclosures:
The bill modifies the new PPA pension benefit statement by adding new requirements for participant-directed plans. For the portion of the account for which the participant has the right to direct, the following information must be provided:
The quarterly benefit statement may, but is not required to, provide the historical return and risk of each investment option and the estimated amount that the participant needs to contribute each month so as to retire at his or her Social Security retirement age.
If a plan has fewer than 100 participants, the plan may comply with the pension benefit statement requirements on an annual rather than quarterly basis.
The bill provides that the plan administrator or participant disclosures may be made by electronic medium under rules prescribed by DOL, which must be similar to those applicable under the Internal Revenue Code for participant notices. DOL’s rules must provide for a method, designed so not to be overly burdensome for the average participant, to obtain a paper copy upon request.
DOL is directed to prescribe a model statement and notice for the service provider and participant disclosures.
The chairman’s substitute retained the mandated index fund requirement in the original version of H.R. 3185. During the mark-up, the Committee approved an amendment removing the index fund requirement as a requirement under ERISA § 402 and instead conditioning relief under ERISA § 404(c) on the offering of an index fund meeting certain requirements. [8]
The amendment adopted by the Committee provides that relief under ERISA § 404(c) will not be available to a plan fiduciary unless the plan includes at least one investment option which consists of an “appropriate broad based securities market index fund (or a combination of 2 or more such funds), and which (in the aggregate) is diversified so as to minimize the risk of large losses, and which offers a combination of historical returns, risk, and charges [as defined above] that is likely to meet retirement income needs at adequate levels of contribution.”
The bill would make the new disclosure and index fund requirements described above effective for plan years beginning one year after enactment.
The bill provides a $1,000 per day penalty for a service provider (as defined earlier), subject to a maximum penalty of 10 percent of the “amount involved,” if the plan administrator disclosure provision is violated. [9] The bill also provides for a $100 per day penalty for a plan administrator or service provider that fails or refuses to provide the participant investment disclosure or the quarterly benefit statement. DOL may modify the penalty if it determines that the person acted reasonably and in good faith or that severe hardship would otherwise occur to the plan sponsor and that the modification is in the interests of participants.
DOL is required to notify the applicable regulatory authority if DOL determines that a service provider is engaged in a pattern or practice that precludes compliance by plan administrators and to widely disseminate the service provider’s identity.
Michael L. Hadley
Associate Counsel
[1] For information on the original H.R. 3185, see Memorandum to Pension Members No. 44-07, Federal Legislation Members No. 4-07, Bank, Trust and Recordkeeper Advisory Committee No. 35-07, Broker/Dealer Advisory Committee No. 43-07 and Operations Committee No. 19-07 [21396], dated July 27, 2007. For information on S. 2473, see Memorandum to Pension Members No. 1-08, Federal Legislation Members No. 1-08, Bank, Trust and Recordkeeper Advisory Committee No. 1-08, Broker/Dealer Advisory Committee No. 1-08 and Operations Committee No. 1-08 [22086], dated January 2, 2008.
[2] The plan administrator disclosure requirements apply to all ERISA-governed individual account plans (not just participant-directed 401(k) plans), including ERISA covered 403(b) plans and other defined contribution plans.
[3] The $5,000 amount would be increased for cost of living for calendar years beginning after 2010.
[4] It is not clear whether or not this includes commission costs for a mutual fund’s portfolio trading.
[5] The bill would allow plans with immediate eligibility or that have an automatic contribution arrangement to provide the information within any reasonable period prior to initial investment. DOL must prescribe exceptions for circumstances similar to those for blackout notices (i.e., in ERISA § 101(i)(2)(C)).
[6] The bill gives as examples fees charged to participants to cover administration, compliance, and recordkeeping costs, plan loan origination fees, possible redemption fees, and possible surrender charges.
[7] For this purpose, the term “charge” has the meaning above.
[8] ERISA § 404(c) provides relief for plan fiduciaries when a plan allows participants to direct the investment of their account. Essentially, fiduciaries are relieved from losses resulting from the investment decisions of participants.
[9] In other words, the $1,000 per day penalty applies to the service provider if the plan administrator enters into a contact with a service provider without receiving the necessary disclosures.
Latest Comment Letters:
TEST - ICI Comment Letter Opposing Sales Tax on Additional Services in Maryland
ICI Comment Letter Opposing Sales Tax on Additional Services in Maryland
ICI Response to the European Commission on the Savings and Investments Union