
Fundamentals for Newer Directors 2014 (pdf)
The latest edition of ICI’s flagship publication shares a wealth of research and data on trends in the investment company industry.
[21760]
October 5, 2007
TO: PENSION MEMBERS No. 56-07
Representative Richard Neal (D-Ma) introduced the “Defined Contribution Plan Fee Transparency Act of 2007” (H.R. 3765) which would require certain disclosures to be provided by plan administrators to participants, and by plan service providers to plan administrators. The bill amends the Internal Revenue Code by adding two new excise tax provisions that apply if the bill’s disclosures are not provided. A copy of the bill’s text is attached.
The new participant disclosures under the bill would apply to any participant-directed defined contribution plan that is a qualified plan, 403(a) annuity plan, governmental 457(b) plan, or 403(b) plan.
The bill would require that a plan administrator [1] provide to eligible employees, prior to initial investment, [2] a written explanation of the plan’s fees and expenses, the key characteristics of the plan’s investment options, and an explanation of how to make investment elections.
A written description would be deemed to satisfy the requirement for each investment option if the explanation:
The bill requires affected participants be provided this enrollment disclosure again in advance of any change to the investment options available under the plan.
The bill would require that participants receive an annual notice describing the investment options that the participant selected as of the last day of the plan year and the key characteristics of each option. The notice must be provided within 90 days following the end of the plan year.
An annual notice would be deemed to satisfy the requirements if the notice provides a description of:
The annual notice also must include a statement similar to the statement provided at enrollment that investments should be selected not only on the basis of fees but also based on other key factors, and must include a statement of how a participant can access the information in the enrollment disclosures.
Failure to meet the participant notice requirements results in an excise tax imposed on the employer maintaining the plan of $100 per day per participant, not to exceed $500,000 per plan year. The tax does not apply if waived by the IRS or if the employer exercised reasonable diligence and corrects the failure within 90 days.
The bill allows fees and expenses to be expressed as a dollar amount or as a percentage of assets (or a combination of the two). The bill also allows reasonable estimates to be provided, and for the annual notice, for the estimate to be based on fees and expenses as of any date on or after the last day of the preceding plan year (but prior to the date the annual notice is provided). The participant notices may be combined with any other plan communication, and may be provided using any new technologies that may be used for other notices required under Code Section 401(a). Treasury is directed to prescribe models for the participant notices.
Treasury is also required to issue regulations addressing the appropriate classification of fees and expenses and addressing the disclosure of fees and expenses in investment alternatives “that do not have explicit fees, including investment alternatives that provide a guaranteed rate of return.”
The participant disclosures would apply to plan years beginning on or after January 1, 2009.
The new service provider disclosures under the bill would apply to any defined contribution plan (whether or not participant-directed) that is a qualified plan, 403(a) annuity plan, governmental 457(b) plan, or 403(b) plan.
The service provider disclosures described below must be provided to participants upon request and must be posted on any Intranet or Internet website maintained for the purpose of providing participants access to plan information.
The bill would require that a service provider provide a plan administrator an initial written disclosure prior to entering into or materially modifying a contract for plan services. The initial disclosure must include:
For a contract that provides for both investment management and administration and recordkeeping, the estimate of total fees and expenses must itemize the annual fees between investment management on the one hand and administration and recordkeeping on the other. A service provider that does not separately price these components may reasonably allocate the fees and expenses among them.
The bill would require that within 90 days of the end of each plan year, the service provider must provide the plan administrator with a statement of the fees and expenses under the arrangement during the plan year, including itemization of investment management and administration and recordkeeping and itemization of amounts paid to third-party services providers. The annual statement must include the amount the service provider received from sources other than the plan or plan sponsor in connection with services provided to the plan (and the identity of each source).
Failure to meet the disclosure requirements would result in an excise tax on the service provider of $1,000 per day per plan, not to exceed $1,000,000 per calendar year. The tax does not apply if waived by the IRS or if the service provider exercised reasonable diligence and corrects the failure within 90 days.
The bill allows fees and expenses to be expressed as a dollar amount or as a percentage of assets (or a combination of the two). The bill also allows reasonable estimates to be provided. For disclosure of payments the service provider pays to or receives from third parties, no disclosure is required if the amounts are not expected to exceed $5,000.
The service provider disclosure rules would apply to arrangements entered into or materially modified on or after 90 days after enactment.
The legislation introduced by Representative Neal follows related legislation (H.R. 3185) introduced by Representative George Miller in July 2007. [3] Although there are similarities in the specifics, H.R. 3765 generally requires less detailed disclosure, especially in the provisions for service provider disclosure. H.R. 3765 would not mandate that plans offer an index fund and would not create a new Advisory Council. H.R. 3185 would only amend ERISA and does not contain Internal Revenue Code excise tax provisions.
Michael L. Hadley
Assistant Counsel
[1] Plan administrator has the meaning in Code Section 414(g), which is either the person or persons named in the plan document or, if no one is named, the employer or employer organization who maintains the plan.
[2] Treasury is directed to issue regulations allowing the enrollment notice to be provided after initial contribution for plans that provide for automatic enrollment.
[3] For a description of H.R. 3185, see Memorandum to Pension Members No. 44-07, Federal Legislation Members No. 4-07, Bank, Trust and Recordkeeper Advisory Committee No. 25-07, Broker/Dealer Advisory Committee No. 43-07, and Operations Committee No. 19-07 [21396], dated July 27, 2007.
Latest Comment Letters:
TEST - ICI Comment Letter Opposing Sales Tax on Additional Services in Maryland
ICI Comment Letter Opposing Sales Tax on Additional Services in Maryland
ICI Response to the European Commission on the Savings and Investments Union