
Fundamentals for Newer Directors 2014 (pdf)
The latest edition of ICI’s flagship publication shares a wealth of research and data on trends in the investment company industry.
Stay informed of the policy priorities ICI champions on behalf of the asset management industry and individual investors.
Explore research from ICI’s experts on industry-related developments, trends, and policy issues.
Explore expert resources, analysis, and opinions on key topics affecting the asset management industry.
Read ICI’s latest publications, press releases, statements, and blog posts.
See ICI’s upcoming and past events.
The latest edition of ICI’s flagship publication shares a wealth of research and data on trends in the investment company industry.
Explore expert resources, analysis, and opinions on key topics affecting the asset management industry.
Read ICI’s latest publications, press releases, statements, and blog posts.
See ICI’s upcoming and past events.
ICI Innovate brings together multidisciplinary experts to explore how emerging technologies will impact fund operations and their implications for the broader industry.
ICI Innovate is participating in the Emerging Leaders initiative, offering a heavily discounted opportunity for the next generation of asset management professionals to participate in ICI’s programming.
The Emerging.
Stay informed of the policy priorities ICI champions on behalf of the asset management industry and individual investors.
Explore research from ICI’s experts on industry-related developments, trends, and policy issues.
Explore expert resources, analysis, and opinions on key topics affecting the asset management industry.
Read ICI’s latest publications, press releases, statements, and blog posts.
See ICI’s upcoming and past events.
[21553]
August 31, 2007
TO: SEC RULES MEMBERS No. 115-07
The Securities and Exchange Commission has instituted enforcement proceedings against a broker-dealer (the “Respondent”) alleging various violations of the SEC’s privacy rules under the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act, Regulation S-P. [1] The facts and violations alleged in the Commission’s Order are briefly described below.
According to the Order, the Respondent recruited new representatives by encouraging them to leave their current broker-dealer employer and bring their existing customers to the Respondent. To assist the recruits in this process, the Respondent had a “transition team” that supplied the recruits with an Excel spreadsheet for the representative to populate with certain information about their customers including, among other information, their brokerage account numbers, mutual fund or variable annuity account numbers, social security numbers, personal financial information, passport numbers, drivers’ license numbers, bank information, employer details, and dates of birth.
The Order alleges that the Respondent’s transition team encouraged the recruits to provide the completed Excel spreadsheet to the Respondent by email, even though the Respondent did not encrypt its email. In some instances, in lieu of the recruits completing the Excel spread sheet, the transition team was provided the recruits’ user IDs and passwords at the recruits’ current broker-dealer so the transition team could access the above information directly from the broker-dealers’ records. The Order alleges that the transition team also used these IDs and passwords to access various mutual fund and annuity company websites to extract nonpublic personal information. Once a recruit left his or her existing broker-dealer and joined the Respondent, the recruit would send its customers account transfer documents that had been pre-printed by the Respondent based upon the above information.
The Order alleges that the above information obtained by the Respondent’s transition team:
The Order further alleges that the recruits’ customers were not informed that their nonpublic personal information was being provided to the Respondent prior to it being provided; nor did the Respondent take steps to determine whether the privacy policies of the recruits’ current broker-dealers permitted the transfer of such information to the Respondent or other nonaffiliated broker-dealers. It also alleges that, when a representative leaves the Respondent, the representative is permitted to take copies of all of his or her customer filers and documents, including those containing nonpublic personal information. Until June 2006, the Respondent’s privacy policy did not inform its customers of this practice, nor did it provide them the opportunity to opt out of the sharing of this information with the representative’s new employer.
Based on the above conduct, the Order alleges that the Respondent violated the following provisions of Regulation S-P:
This matter remains pending.
Earlier this month, FINRA issued a Regulatory Notice clarifying the application of Regulation S-P when a broker-dealer is supervising the recommendations of newly associated representatives to replace mutual funds and variable products. [2] According to this Notice, a broker-dealer’s procedures to review and evaluate recommendations do not conflict with its obligations under Regulation S-P. In conducting reasonable due diligence of the prospective representative’s customer base, “the new firm needs to learn only the identity of the various mutual fund and variable products held by the registered representative’s customer base. Detailed, nonpublic information about individual customers and their particular investments is not necessary to meeting the objectives [of the members’ due diligence] review.”
Tamara K. Salmon
Senior Associate Counsel
[1] See In the Matter of: Next Financial Group, Order Instituting Administrative and Cease-and-Desist Proceedings Pursuant to Sections 15(b) and 21C of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Admin. File No. 3-12738) (the “Order”). A copy of the Order is available on the SEC’s website at: http://sec.gov/litigation/admin/2007/34-56316-o.pdf.
[2] See Regulatory Notice 07-36, FINRA (August 2007), which is available on FINRA’s website at: http://www.finra.org/web/groups/rules_regs/documents/notice_to_members/p036445.pdf
Latest Comment Letters:
TEST - ICI Comment Letter Opposing Sales Tax on Additional Services in Maryland
ICI Comment Letter Opposing Sales Tax on Additional Services in Maryland
ICI Response to the European Commission on the Savings and Investments Union