©2006 Investment Company Institute. All rights reserved. Information may be abridged and therefore incomplete.
Communications from the Institute do not constitute, and should not be considered a substitute for, legal advice.
[20590]
November 16, 2006
TO: INTERNATIONAL MEMBERS No. 30-06
INTERNATIONAL OPERATIONS ADVISORY COMMITTEE No. 34-06
RE: EUROPEAN COMMISSION PUBLISHES WHITE PAPER ON ENHANCING THE
FRAMEWORK FOR INVESTMENT FUNDS IN EUROPE
Yesterday, the European Commission published its highly anticipated White Paper on
enhancing the framework for investment funds in Europe.1 The White Paper sets out the views of the
Commission on the current environment for funds in Europe and provides a roadmap of legislative and
regulatory proposals that it intends to make in the next few years.
A copy of the White Paper is attached. It is also available, along with a number of related
documents, on the Commission’s web site at
http://ec.europa.eu/internal_market/securities/ucits/index_en.htm#061116.
Background
On July 14, 2005, the European Commission issued a Green Paper analyzing the fund market
and regulatory framework in the EU and suggesting possible ways in the short and medium term to
improve EU regulations to facilitate the development of the fund industry in Europe. The Institute
submitted a comment letter in response to the Green Paper strongly supporting the Commission’s
efforts, but also suggesting a number of ways in which the cross-border market for funds in Europe
could be improved.2
1 Commission of the European Communities, White Paper on Enhancing the Single Market Framework for Investment
Funds, COM(2006)686, dated November 15, 2006 (the “White Paper”).
2 See Memorandum No. 19367, dated November 15, 2005.
2
Recommendations to Improve Efficiency
In the White Paper, the Commission concludes that there is a significant need for
improvement in the legislative and regulatory framework for funds in Europe. The Commission states:
The UCITS Directive is no longer sufficient to support the European
fund industry as it restructures to meet new competitive challenges and
the changing needs of European investors. Core elements of the
Directive are not functioning effectively. The freedoms conferred by
the Directive come at the price of unnecessarily high compliance costs.
It does not allow fund managers with funds or activities in different
Member States sufficient flexibility to organise [sic] or restructure
businesses. These inefficiencies and constraints are reflected in higher
costs and lower returns that are borne by the fund investors.
Independent research estimates that a reduction in European fund
operating costs to US levels costs would boost nominal investment
returns by 3%.3
As a result, the Commission proposes a number of legislative and non-legislative actions in the
coming years to improve the efficiency of the fund industry in Europe. With respect to legislative
changes, the Commission will propose:
1. Amendments to improve the notification process that allows funds to be “passported” and
sold on a cross-border basis in Europe;4
2. Additional provisions to create the appropriate legal and regulatory conditions for the
merger of funds;
3. Amendments to the diversification rules and other provisions of the Directive in order to
allow an expansive approach to “entity pooling” to facilitate structures such as master-
feeder funds;
4. Amendments to allow an authorized management company to manage corporate and
contractual funds in other European member states (i.e., the management company
passport); and
3 White Paper at 3.
4 Streamlining and simplifying the “fund passport” – the notification procedure that enables a fund to be sold outside of its
home market – was the Institute’s primary recommendation in its comment letter on the Green Paper.
3
5. Proposals to strengthen the provisions of the UCITS Directive relating to competent
authorities and supervisory cooperation.
The Commission also makes recommendations in three areas that do not require changes to the
UCITS Directive. These include:
1. Urging national authorities to expedite fund approvals and adhere to strict deadlines for
authorization in the country of domicile;
2. Calling on the European industry to develop a coherent strategy to phase in the necessary
improvements in message routing and fund order processing and settlement5; and
3. Recommending that Member States take a number of steps to remove barriers to choice
and flexibility in the appointment of fund custodians.
Recommendations to Make the Single Fund Market Work Better for Investors
In the White Paper, the Commission also makes two significant recommendations intended to
make the European fund market better for end investors. The first is to revisit efforts to create a
workable simplified prospectus, including through amendments to the UCITS Directive to clarify the
fundamental objectives and guiding principles of the simplified prospectus and by revisiting the
Commission’s recommendation to enhance risk, cost and performance disclosures.6 The second is to
carefully monitor the implementation of MiFID rules on “conduct of business” and inducements in
respect of intermediated fund sales. In this regard, the Commission notes that:
At present, fund managers will pay on average 50% of their
management fee to a third party distributor. It needs to be examined
whether such commissions constitute payment for services rendered
such as pre/after-sales service to clients. Conflicts of interest and
inducements must be properly managed or disclosed: intermediaries
5 The portion of the White Paper on this point may be of particular interest to members of the International Operations
Advisory Committee. The Commission states that:
Fund order-processing has not kept pace with the growth of the market, and changes in distribution
systems. It is characterised [sic] by higher operational risks, longer processing delays and, inevitably,
higher costs. However, these inefficiencies are not rooted in regulation or public sector intervention –
but arise from private sector inertia and the difficulties of coordinating a transition to superior
technologies or more efficient business models. The Commission calls on the European industry to
develop a coherent strategy to phase in the necessary improvements in these functions.
White Paper at 9.
6 The Commission’s assessment of the current European effort to create a simplified prospectus was particularly negative,
stating that the effort has “manifestly failed” and resulted in “a massive paper-chase of limited value to investors and a
considerable overhead for the fund industry.” White Paper at 10.
4
must diligently undertake duties of care to the retail client.7
Other Recommendations
In addition to the steps outlined above, the White Paper discusses the Commission’s intentions
on two additional topics: non-harmonized (i.e., non-UCITS) retail products and the marketing and
sale of products to “qualified investors.” The White Paper states that the Commission will study the
likely costs, benefits and risks of providing a single market framework for non-harmonized retail
products, with an expectation that it will publish a report on that topic in 2008. With respect to
“qualified investors,” the White Paper states that the Commission will study the types of marketing and
sales restrictions that should be repealed in favor of reliance on the investment firms exercising
responsibility for the sale of products on a client-by-client basis, and also will undertake a systematic
inventory and analysis of national barriers to the private placement of financial instruments with
institutional investors and other eligible counterparties. The Commission expects to be able to report
on this topic by the fall of 2007.
* * * * *
Robert C. Grohowski
Senior Counsel - International Affairs
Attachment (in .pdf format)
Note: Not all recipients receive the attachment. To obtain a copy of the attachment, please visit our members website
(http://members.ici.org) and search for memo 20590, or call the ICI Library at (202) 326-8304 and request the attachment
for memo 20590.
7 White Paper at 11.
Latest Comment Letters:
TEST - ICI Comment Letter Opposing Sales Tax on Additional Services in Maryland
ICI Comment Letter Opposing Sales Tax on Additional Services in Maryland
ICI Response to the European Commission on the Savings and Investments Union