©2006 Investment Company Institute. All rights reserved. Information may be abridged and therefore incomplete.
Communications from the Institute do not constitute, and should not be considered a substitute for, legal advice.
[20264]
August 10, 2006
TO: 529 PLAN ADVISORY COMMITTEE No. 14-06
529 PLAN MEMBERS No. 14-06
RE: MSRB REMINDS DEALERS THAT THE MSRB'S INTERPRETIVE GUIDANCE
RELATING TO THE SALE OF 529 PLANS WAS EFFECTIVE AUGUST 7TH
The Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board (MSRB) has issued a notice reminding municipal
securities dealers that the MSRB’s interpretive guidance relating to customer protection obligations in
connection with the marketing 529 college savings plans was effective August 7, 2006.1 The Notice sets
forth the contents of the interpretive guidance, which has not changed since its approval by the SEC in
June 2006 and which is summarized below.2
REQUIRED DISCLOSURES FOR SALES OF OUT-OF-STATE 529 PLANS
According to the Notice, MSRB Rule G-17 requires dealers selling out-of-state 529 college
savings plans to disclose to the customer, at or prior to the time of the trade, that:
Depending on the laws of the home state of the customer or designated beneficiary, favorable
state tax treatment or other benefits offered by such home state may be available only if the
customer invests in the home state’s 529 plan;
State-based benefits should be one of many appropriately weighted factors to be considered in
making an investment decision;
The customer should consult with his or her financial, tax, or other adviser about how such
state-based benefits would apply to the customer’s specific circumstances; and
The customer may wish to consult his or her home state or any other 529 college savings plan to
learn more about their features.
1 See Interpretation on Customer Protection Obligations Relating to the Marketing of 529 College Savings Plans Becomes
Effective, MSRB Notice 2006-23 (August 7, 2006) (the “Notice”). A copy of the Notice is available on the MSRB’s website
at: http://www.msrb.org/msrb1/whatsnew/2006-23.asp.
2 See Institute Memorandum to 529 Plan Advisory Committee No. 11–06 and to 529 Plan Members No. 10–06
[No. 20125] dated June 21, 2006, which summarizes the MSRB’s interpretative guidance as approved by the SEC.
2
These disclosure obligations may be met through the issuer’s program disclosure document,
provided that the customer receives the disclosure timely and it appears in the document in a manner
that is reasonably likely to be noted by an investor. The disclosure would be reasonably likely to be
noted by an investor if it is in close proximity to and presented with equal prominence to (1) the
principal presentation of substantive information on other federal or state tax-related matters, and (2)
each other presentation of information on state-tax related matters. If the issuer’s disclosure document
does not satisfy this standard, the disclosure obligation may be fulfilled by including the disclosure in
the document in another manner so long as such disclosure is reasonably likely to be noted by an
investor. Otherwise, the dealer is obligated to disclose such information separately to the customer no
later than the time of the trade.
If the dealer provides information to an out-of-state customer about the state tax or other
benefits available through the customer’s home state, Rule G-17 requires the dealer to ensure that the
information is not false or misleading. Dealers should make sure that any information they provide to
customers, whether pursuant to an affirmative disclosure obligation or in response to questions from
the customer, is correct and not misleading.
The disclosure a dealer is required to provide in connection with the sale of an out-of-state plan
is in addition to any obligation the dealer has under Rule G-17 to disclose to its customers, at or prior to
the time of trade, all material facts known by dealers about the 529 college savings plan interests it is
selling to its customer. This disclosure is also in addition to the dealer’s duty to disclose all material
facts about the 529 college savings plan that are reasonably accessible to the market.
SUITABILITY
The Notice reminds dealers that providing the required disclosures in connection with the sale
of out-of-state plans does not relieve them from their suitability duties. These duties include the
dealer’s obligation to consider the customer’s financial status, tax status, and investment objectives in
connection with recommended transactions. The Notice emphasizes that any dealer recommending a
transaction must actively analyze information about the customer and the security and must consider
appropriately weighted factors that are relevant to the customer’s particular situation. It also reminds
dealers of their obligation to have and enforce written supervisory procedures that are reasonably
designed to ensure compliance with their suitability obligations in connection with each recommended
transaction.
In connection with the dealer’s suitability requirements, the MSRB believes that it is crucial for
dealers to remain cognizant of the fact that 529 college savings plans are designed for a particular
purpose and the purpose generally should match the customer’s investment objective. Also, because an
investor generally is required to designate a specific beneficiary for the plan, the MSRB believes that
information about that designed beneficiary generally would be relevant in weighing the investment
objectives of the customer as part of a suitability analysis.
3
OTHER SALES PRACTICE PRINCIPLES
Based upon the particular facts and circumstances, the following may violate Rule G-17’s
requirement that dealers deal fairly with all persons and not engage in any dishonest or unfair practice:
Engaging in transactions primarily designed to increase commission revenues in a manner that
is unfair to customers;
Recommending an unsuitable share class;
Engaging in churning or recommending rollovers year after year;
Consistently recommending that, of the various 529 plans offered by the dealer, customers
invest in the one that offers the dealer the highest compensation;
Recommending transactions in amounts designed to avoid commission discounts;
Engaging in marketing activities that result in a customer being treated unfairly; and
Acting in a manner that is reasonably likely to induce another dealer or its associated persons to
violate Rule G-17 or other MSRB customer protection rules.
Tamara K. Salmon
Senior Associate Counsel
Latest Comment Letters:
TEST - ICI Comment Letter Opposing Sales Tax on Additional Services in Maryland
ICI Comment Letter Opposing Sales Tax on Additional Services in Maryland
ICI Response to the European Commission on the Savings and Investments Union