©2006 Investment Company Institute. All rights reserved. Information may be abridged and therefore incomplete.
Communications from the Institute do not constitute, and should not be considered a substitute for, legal advice.
[19634]
January 26, 2006
TO: AML COMPLIANCE WORKING GROUP No. 3-06
TRANSFER AGENT ADVISORY COMMITTEE No. 7-06
RE: FINCEN PROPOSES AML RULE ON “ENHANCED DUE DILIGENCE” FOR CERTAIN
TYPES OF FOREIGN BANKS
As a companion to the rule on correspondent accounts adopted earlier this month,1 the
Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (“FinCEN”) has proposed a rule that would require
certain financial institutions, including mutual funds, to conduct “enhanced due diligence” to
guard against money laundering in accounts established for certain categories of high-risk
foreign banks.2
Comments must be submitted before March 6th. The Institute may comment on this
proposal, either individually or jointly with other financial trade associations. If you have
issues that you would like the Institute to consider raising, please contact me by phone (202-
371-5430), fax (202-326-5841), or e-mail (rcg@ici.org).
Categories of Banks Subject to Enhanced Due Diligence
The proposed rule would require enhanced due diligence (described below) with regard
to foreign banks operating under any of the following three types of licenses:
1. An offshore banking license;
2. A banking license issued by a foreign country that has been designated as non-
cooperative with international anti-money laundering principles or procedures by
an intergovernmental group or organization of which the United States is a
member and with which designation the U.S. representative to the group or
organization concurs; or
1 See memoranda nos. 19496, dated December 19, 2005, and 19580, dated January 6, 2006.
2 71 Fed. Reg. 516 (Jan. 4, 2006). A copy of the proposed rule is attached.
2
3. A banking license issued by a foreign country that has been designated by the
Secretary of the Treasury as warranting special measures due to money
laundering concerns.
Enhanced Due Diligence
The proposed rule requires mutual funds to conduct “enhanced scrutiny” of accounts
for the types of foreign banks described above to guard against money laundering and to
identify and report any suspicious transactions in the accounts. Although the rule states that
such “enhanced scrutiny” procedures must “reflect the risk assessment of the account,” it also
specifically requires the procedures to include, as appropriate, the following elements:
1. Procedures to obtain and review documentation relating to the foreign bank’s
AML program;
2. Procedures to consider whether such AML program appears to be reasonably
designed to detect and prevent money laundering;
3. Procedures to monitor transactions to, from, or through the account in a manner
reasonably designed to detect money laundering and suspicious activity; and
4. Procedures to obtain information from the foreign bank about the identity of any
person with authority to direct transactions through any payable-through account,
and the sources and beneficial owner of funds or other assets in the payable-
through account.
The proposed rule also requires mutual funds to determine whether the foreign bank in
turn maintains correspondent accounts for other foreign banks that use the account established
or maintained by the mutual fund (referred to in the proposing release as “nested banks”). If
the foreign bank has customers that are nested banks, the proposed rule requires the mutual
fund to take reasonable steps to obtain information about those nested banks.
The proposed rule further requires mutual funds to determine the identity of each
owner of any foreign bank subject to the rule that is not publicly traded, as well as the nature
and extent of each such owner’s ownership interest.
Finally, the proposed rule requires the enhanced due diligence program to include
procedures to be followed when the mutual fund cannot perform appropriate due diligence or
enhanced due diligence, including when the fund should refuse to open an account, suspend
transaction activity, file a suspicious activity report, or close an account.
Robert C. Grohowski
Senior Counsel - International Affairs
Attachment
Attachment (in .pdf format)
3
Latest Comment Letters:
TEST - ICI Comment Letter Opposing Sales Tax on Additional Services in Maryland
ICI Comment Letter Opposing Sales Tax on Additional Services in Maryland
ICI Response to the European Commission on the Savings and Investments Union