May 30, 1990
TO: PUBLIC INFORMATION COMMITTEE NO. 17-90
RE: Press Coverage of "The Environment for the Investment
Company Industry in the 1990s"
__________________________________________________________
As you know, Jonathan Clements (WSJ) and Carole Gould (NYT)
recently wrote articles based on the preliminary report on the
fund industry in the 1990s. The report was prepared by Heidi S.
Fiske, a consultant to the ICI, who made a preliminary report of
her findings at the recent General Membership Meeting (a copy of
her handout at the GMM is attached). While it is unlikely there
will be much more press coverage until the final report is
released this summer, this initial coverage raises concern over
how the press will present the report's findings when it is
widely available. Both the Journal and the Times latched onto
the themes of significantly slower growth for the fund industry
in the `90s than in the `80s, and a coming margin squeeze that
could shrink profits for some sponsors. Once the final report is
released, various companies will likely be contacted by the media
for reaction.
At its May 23 meeting, the ICI Marketing Committee expressed
concern that future articles on the Fiske report may focus on
certain negative themes, even though the study, overall, provides
a positive outlook for the fund industry. The Committee suggests
that in our individual discussions with the press we might
emphasize these aspects of the report:
* Industry Growth: Both the Times and Journal compared projected
annual growth of 12 percent in the `90s to the unsustainable 30
percent rate of 1978-89 as the preliminary report did. However we
can emphasize that several factors should enable the industry to
continue growing at a very healthy rate, with total assets
expected to increase from $1 trillion to $3.5 trillion in the
next decade. This is a rate that would be superlative in most
other industries. The report notes that pooled investment
products will play an even broader role in Americans' financial
life due to complexity of markets, the aging of the baby boomers,
concern for retirement, greater interest in international
investments, etc. These are all positive points that we can
emphasize.
* Defined Contribution Plans: These employee driven savings
plans such as 401 (k), profit-sharing plans, and 403 (b) will
become an even greater source of industry growth in the future--
what Heidi calls the "insti-vidual" markets. "These markets may
be the fastest growing of all for mutual funds," the report
observes.
* Move Toward Equities: The industry should be a major
beneficiary of greater investor interest in equities. The report
says corporations need to deleverage their balance sheets after
the 80s' debt boom, and investors need equity's higher returns to
fund college and retirement expenses. "These two powerful forces
are only part of what will lead to disproportionate growth of
equity product in the 1990s."
* International Investing: Investors will become more intrigued
with the opportunities available on a global scale and will
increasingly find mutual funds the best and most convenient way
to access those opportunities. Both individuals and institutions
have a relatively small portion of their assets invested in
overseas markets, so this has the potential for tremendous growth
over the decade.
* Mutual funds have in the past few years "arrived" as a major
force in the personal finance arena, and their importance will
continue to increase in the future.
These are some of the key themes the Marketing Committee feels
should be emphasized with the media. They help shape a positive
outlook for mutual funds in the years ahead, instead of an
industry struggling to stay afloat at "only a projected 12
percent annual growth rate." As we move closer to publication of
the final report, we can discuss how we might handle press
inquiries. This will probably be an agenda item at our July 16
committee meeting. In the meantime, we wanted you to be aware of
the current thinking and concerns on this subject.
Steve Norwitz
Erick Kanter
Latest Comment Letters:
TEST - ICI Comment Letter Opposing Sales Tax on Additional Services in Maryland
ICI Comment Letter Opposing Sales Tax on Additional Services in Maryland
ICI Response to the European Commission on the Savings and Investments Union