©2005 Investment Company Institute. All rights reserved. Information may be abridged and therefore incomplete.
Communications from the Institute do not constitute, and should not be considered a substitute for, legal advice.
[19030]
July 26, 2005
TO: PENSION COMMITTEE No. 26-05
PENSION OPERATIONS ADVISORY COMMITTEE No. 23-05
RE: IRS ISSUES PROPOSED REGULATIONS CONCERNING USE OF ELECTRONIC
TECHNOLOGIES FOR PLAN-RELATED NOTICES, ELECTIONS AND CONSENTS;
CONFERENCE CALL SCHEDULED FOR AUGUST 9, 2005
The Internal Revenue Service has issued proposed regulations providing guidance on
the use of electronic media to provide certain notices to plan participants and beneficiaries and
to transmit participant elections1 relating to employee benefit arrangements.2 The proposed
regulations also reflect the provisions of the Electronic Signatures in Global and National
Commerce Act (E-SIGN).
Proposed section 1.401(a)-21 of the regulations would govern the use of electronic media
for participant notices and elections that are required to be in writing or in written form. In
addition, the provision would provide a safe harbor method for using such media for notices
and elections that are not required to be in writing or in written form. The new section would
supplement the general requirements related to each notice and election, as well as require that
a notice must be required in a manner no less understandable than a written paper document.3
A notice via an electronic medium would satisfy the written document requirement if
either (1) the consumer consent requirements of subsection (b) were satisfied; or (2) the
requirements of subsection (c) for exemption from the consumer consent provisions were
satisfied. Under proposed subsection (b), the recipient of the notice would be required to
affirmatively consent to the delivery of the notice using electronic media. The recipient
1 A “participant election” under the proposed regulations includes any consent, election, request, agreement or
similar communication made by or from a participant, beneficiary, or alternate payee.
2 The proposed regulations are available at http://www.regulations.gov/fredpdfs/05-13911.pdf. The proposed
regulations would cover notices and elections under qualified plans, section 403(b) arrangements, simplified
employee pensions (SEPs), simple retirement plans, and 457 plans, but would not apply to notices, elections,
consents, or disclosures under the provisions of Title I or IV of ERISA. In addition, the proposed regulations do not
address tax reporting issues.
3 An example in the preamble states that a lengthy section 402(f) notice delivered through a pre-recorded message
would not satisfy this requirement.
2
generally could consent either electronically or using a written paper document, but only if the
recipient confirmed the consent electronically in a manner that reasonably demonstrated that
the recipient could access the notice in the applicable electronic form. Specific disclosures
would be required prior to such consent.
The exemption from the consumer consent requirements in proposed subsection (c)
would replicate the requirements in the 2000 final regulations4 governing such notices under
Code sections 402(f), 411(a)(11), and 3405, and allow plans to continue to provide electronic
notices under the 2000 rules. For example, the regulations would retain the requirement that, at
the time the notice is provided, the participant must be advised that he or she may request and
must receive the applicable notice in writing on paper at no charge.
The rules in subsection (d) governing participant elections also would be based
generally on the 2000 regulations. Unlike the 2000 regulations, however, the proposed
regulations would allow the electronic notarization of spousal consent under Code section 417,
if the individual’s signature were witnessed in the physical presence of a plan representative or
notary public.
According the preamble, the regulations would apply only prospectively, and thus
cannot be relied upon prior to their issuance as final regulations.
The deadline for comments concerning the proposed regulations is October 12, 2005.
The Service specifically requests comments on the clarity of the proposed regulations and how
they can be made easier to understand. In addition, the Service asks for comments as to
whether the regulations should include exceptions to the rule requiring the physical presence of
the spouse for a notarization of the spouse’s consent. The Service is considering whether to: (1)
allow no exceptions; (2) add a general standard that does not require the spouse’s presence for
electronic notarization of an electronic signature; or (3) grant the Commissioner discretion to
allow, after notice and comment, a particular form of electronic notarization that does not
require the spouse’s presence.
Institute Conference Call
The Institute has scheduled a conference call for Tuesday, August 9 at 2:00 p.m. Eastern
time to discuss the Institute’s comments concerning the proposed regulations. If you would
like to participate in this call, please complete the attached response form and fax it to Brenda
Turner at (202) 326-5841 or e-mail it to bturner@ici.org by noon, Tuesday, August 9. To
participate in the call, please dial 888-396-9923 and enter passcode 34543. If you have any
questions about the call, please contact the undersigned at (202) 371-5432 or kireland@ici.org.
Kathy D. Ireland
Senior Associate Counsel
Attachment (in .pdf format)
4 See Memorandum to Pension Members No. 14-00 and Pension Operations Advisory Committee No. 13-00, dated
February 15, 2000.
Latest Comment Letters:
TEST - ICI Comment Letter Opposing Sales Tax on Additional Services in Maryland
ICI Comment Letter Opposing Sales Tax on Additional Services in Maryland
ICI Response to the European Commission on the Savings and Investments Union