©2005 Investment Company Institute. All rights reserved. Information may be abridged and therefore incomplete.
Communications from the Institute do not constitute, and should not be considered a substitute for, legal advice.
[18746]
April 5, 2005
TO: BROKER/DEALER ADVISORY COMMITTEE No. 11-05
OPERATIONS MEMBERS No. 5-05
SEC RULES MEMBERS No. 47-05
SMALL FUNDS MEMBERS No. 30-05
TECHNOLOGY ADVISORY COMMITTEE No. 7-05
TRANSFER AGENT ADVISORY COMMITTEE No. 12-05
VARIABLE INSURANCE PRODUCTS ADVISORY COMMITTEE No. 4-05
UNIT INVESTMENT TRUST MEMBERS No. 3-05
529 PLAN MEMBERS No. 6-05
RE: ICI COMMENT LETTER ON SEC SUPPLEMENTAL REQUEST FOR COMMENT ON
PROPOSED POINT OF SALE AND CONFIRMATION DISCLOSURE
Last month, the Securities and Exchange Commission requested additional comment on
point of sale and confirmation disclosure relating to mutual funds and other covered securities.*
The Institute’s comment letter is attached and briefly summarized below.
POINT OF SALE DISCLOSURE
The Institute’s letter states that we have continued to study point of sale disclosure over
the past year and that our position and recommendations have evolved. It indicates that our
continued support for requiring point of sale disclosure rests upon the Commission’s ability to
address effectively the many difficult challenges involved. The letter expresses concern that
otherwise, the proposal could have the undesirable, albeit unintended, result of discouraging
brokers from selling mutual funds and incentivizing them instead to sell other products not
subject to point of sale disclosure requirements.
To alleviate this concern, and to provide investors with timely and convenient access to
the required information, the letter strongly recommends that the Commission designate the
Internet as the primary medium for point of sale disclosure. Under our proposal, a broker
would satisfy the disclosure obligation by referring the investor to the broker’s website (or e-
mailing a link) to obtain the required information. The letter recommends permitting investors
* See SEC Release Nos. 33-8544, 34-51274, and IC-26778, dated March 1, 2005 (“the Supplemental Release”). The
Supplemental Release and related attachments are available on the SEC’s website at:
http://www.sec.gov/rules/proposed/33-8544.pdf.
2
who do not have access to the Internet, or who otherwise want to obtain the information in
paper form, to request the disclosure in paper form.
The letter recommends that the Commission refrain at this time from expanding the
scope of the proposal beyond broker costs and conflicts. It encourages the Commission to
undertake a wholesale reexamination of the mutual fund disclosure framework as a separate
initiative.
The letter also recommends that the Commission provide appropriate exceptions from
the point of sale requirements, particularly an exception for directly-sold funds. Other
recommended exceptions would cover subsequent purchases, institutional orders, and
unsolicited orders not involving a broker recommendation.
The letter recommends several changes to the contents of the proposed point of sale
disclosure, including that only a $1,000 hypothetical investment amount (and not hypothetical
investments of $50,000 and $100,000) be shown. It recommends revisions to the definition of
“revenue sharing” for purposes of the conflict of interest disclosure, including limiting it to
payments made in connection with the sale or distribution of fund shares.
CONFIRMATION DISCLOSURE
The letter supports tailored mutual fund confirmations but recommends several changes
to the Commission’s proposal. Among other things, it recommends deleting information about
ongoing fund fees and expenses and broker conflicts of interest because these are redundant of
information that investors will receive through other means either before or with the
confirmation. As such, requiring such disclosure will impose costs without commensurate
benefits for investors.
INTERNET DISCLOSURE OF ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
The Institute’s letter supports requiring brokers to provide additional information about
their compensation and any revenue sharing or differential compensation arrangements on
their websites. It expresses concern with the level of detail proposed by the Commission and
the substantial costs such detailed disclosure will entail. With respect to revenue sharing
payments, the letter recommends that the Commission adopt an approach similar to that
proposed by the NASD in 2003. In particular, instead of requiring disclosure of the dollar
amount of revenue sharing payments, the Commission should require brokers to provide a list
of the fund complexes from which it receives such payments, in descending order based on the
amount of the payments.
PROSPECTUS DISCLOSURE OF REVENUE SHARING ARRANGEMENTS
The letter continues to support the Commission’s proposal to require brief prospectus
disclosure of the fact that a fund complex makes revenue sharing payments along with
disclosure referring investors to their brokers for more specific information. It recommends that
if the Commission determines that funds should be required to provide additional revenue
sharing disclosure, it should address the appropriate level of detail of such disclosure. Any
detailed or technical disclosure should be included in the Statement of Additional Information
3
or posted on a fund’s website. The letter also recommends that the Commission restate its
incorporation by reference doctrine, reaffirming that information in the SAI is deemed to be
included in the prospectus.
UITS AND 529 PLANS
The letter expresses support for tailored point of sale and confirmation disclosure for
UITs and 529 plans. Due to the unique nature of these securities and their distribution,
however, the letter recommends that the Commission carve them out of the new requirements
while it continues to explore separate point of sale and confirmation disclosure better suited for
investors in these products.
COMPLIANCE DATE
The letter recommends that the Commission work with the brokerage industry to
develop an appropriate timetable for compliance with any new requirements, taking into
account the systems and other changes necessitated both by the new requirements and by other
recent and pending Commission initiatives.
Tamara K. Salmon
Senior Associate Counsel
Attachment (in .pdf format)
Note: Not all recipients receive the attachment. To obtain a copy of the attachment, please visit our members
website (http://members.ici.org) and search for memo 18746, or call the ICI Library at (202) 326-8304 and request the
attachment for memo 18746.
Latest Comment Letters:
TEST - ICI Comment Letter Opposing Sales Tax on Additional Services in Maryland
ICI Comment Letter Opposing Sales Tax on Additional Services in Maryland
ICI Response to the European Commission on the Savings and Investments Union