[18667]
March 23, 2005
TO: BOARD OF GOVERNORS No. 13-05
CEOS
CHIEF COMPLIANCE OFFICER COMMITTEE No. 28-05
CLOSED-END INVESTMENT COMPANY MEMBERS No. 17-05
INVESTMENT COMPANY DIRECTORS No. 7-05
PRIMARY CONTACTS - MEMBER COMPLEX No. 13-05
SEC RULES MEMBERS No. 42-05
SMALL FUNDS MEMBERS No. 27-05
UNIT INVESTMENT TRUST MEMBERS No. 2-05
RE: REMARKS BY INSTITUTE PRESIDENT AND SEC CHAIRMAN DONALDSON AT
THE 2005 MUTUAL FUNDS AND INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
Last week, Investment Company Institute President Paul Schott Stevens and Securities
and Exchange Commission Chairman William H. Donaldson delivered the keynote addresses at
the 2005 Mutual Funds and Investment Management Conference in Palm Desert, California.
Their remarks are briefly summarized below.*
Remarks by Mr. Stevens
Mr. Stevens began his remarks by recognizing the regulatory changes the Institute
believes are necessary to help protect the interests of mutual fund shareholders. Mr. Stevens
noted that a month after the mutual fund trading abuses were discovered, the Institute called
for requiring that only mutual fund trades reported to mutual fund companies by 4 p.m. receive
the current day’s price. He added that although the Institute had concluded that a hard close
would provide ample protection against late trading abuses, he recognized that there may well
be more flexible alternatives that provide effective safeguards. Mr. Stevens stated that the
Institute supports the Commission’s deliberate approach to this issue.
With respect to abusive short-term trading, Mr. Stevens stated that because of
widespread industry practice, funds often must rely on their intermediaries to help implement
policies like redemption fees. He added that because such policies can differ from fund to fund,
intermediaries confront real operational challenges and costs in satisfying the requirements of
* A copy of Mr. Stevens’ remarks is available on the Institute’s public website at
http://www.ici.org/statements/remarks/05_mfimc_stevens_spch.html. A copy of Chairman Donaldson’s remarks is
available on the SEC’s website at http://www.sec.gov/news/speech/spch031405whd.htm.
2
the various fund partners. To resolve this dilemma, he noted that the Institute has called for a
uniform, industry minimum redemption fee requirement that would be payable to the fund, for
the exclusive benefit of long-term shareholders. Mr. Stevens noted that although the
Commission had recently taken steps to facilitate the effectiveness of voluntary redemption
fees, the Institute remained concerned that abusive market timers will still be able to play “catch
us if you can” with mutual funds.
Next, Mr. Stevens discussed the debate over 12b-1 fees. He noted that a recent Institute
survey determined that 92 percent of the 12b-1 fees mutual funds collect compensates financial
advisers and other intermediaries for assisting shareholders before and after purchasing funds.
He also stated that about three-quarters of those who purchase funds outside of 401(k) plans do
so through a professional adviser and that any revisions to Rule 12b-1 must take into account
the needs and preferences of fund investors, and reflect how these fees are actually used today.
Mr. Stevens then remarked about the impact of the “unprecedented pace” of regulatory
activity in recent years, noting that since September 2003, the SEC adopted or proposed 19 new
fund industry regulations. Mr. Stevens stated that many of the initiatives are “far-reaching,
intended to transform fundamental business operating systems and in some cases change
business culture – not things that happen overnight.” He noted that the greatest burden falls on
the smaller firms and suggested that such burdens may drive some out of the fund business or
discourage others from entering it. Mr. Stevens stated that the Institute has launched several
initiatives to assist mutual funds in implementing new SEC regulations. He also added that the
Independent Directors Council has issued reports and has other pending projects to assist
directors in implementing new governance requirements.
Mr. Stevens next discussed mutual fund disclosure, noting that the Institute is pleased
the SEC plans to comprehensively review this area. He noted that disclosure today must serve
“disparate purposes,” from informing investors and others to shielding fund companies from
liability. Mr. Stevens further recognized that we must use technology, such as the Internet, to
facilitate disclosure that is “thorough, fast, and flexible.”
Mr. Stevens devoted the balance of his remarks to discussing the issue of retirement
security. First, he noted that the time for a debate about Social Security is now. Specifically, he
stated that we must remedy the structural imbalance in Social Security, with the “goal of
permanent solvency and sustainability.” Second, he opined that time can give people a
“reasonable window of opportunity” to prepare for any major change in the way they must
plan for their financial future. He added that, although the Institute is not advocating the
establishment of personal retirement accounts, it is determined to encourage Americans to save
and invest. In closing, Mr. Stevens stated that, in addition to ensuring the solvency of Social
Security, we must strengthen the private retirement system.
Remarks by Chairman Donaldson
Chairman Donaldson began his remarks by noting that Mr. Stevens has shown
“tremendous leadership” in his new position as President of the Institute. He also
acknowledged the “thoughtful comments and input” the SEC has received from the Institute on
its regulatory initiatives.
3
Turning to the topic of the Commission’s regulatory agenda, Chairman Donaldson
noted that the Commission recently voted to require fund boards to consider whether to charge
a redemption fee of up to two percent in order to address abusive market timing and that the
Commission expected to take action in the coming months on its “hard 4:00 p.m.” proposal. He
acknowledged that SEC staff is evaluating the utility of certain technological alternatives to a
hard 4:00 p.m. rule that will be “effective in addressing the problem of late trading, without
imposing unnecessary burdens on ordinary investors.”
Next, Chairman Donaldson stated that a “Chairman’s Task Force” is reviewing the use
of soft dollars, the impact of soft dollars on our nation’s securities markets, how soft dollars
impact the interests of investors, and ways to improve disclosure to better inform investors and
fund directors about the use and benefits of soft dollars. He also remarked that another issue
under review is potential revisions to Rule 12b-1.
Chairman Donaldson next discussed mutual fund disclosure reform. He stated that the
Commission’s ongoing point of sale initiative has generated helpful input from commenters
and focus groups and that the SEC continues to search for the best method of informing
investors about broker conflicts and compensation. Chairman Donaldson then stated that he
expects the Commission to take up an initiative to better inform investors about mutual fund
transaction costs later this year.
From a broader perspective, Chairman Donaldson acknowledged that he has asked the
SEC staff to carry out a “top-to-bottom review” of the mutual fund disclosure regime. He
added that “investors need disclosure that is clear, understandable, and in a usable format in
order to make informed investment decisions.” He also noted that investors need information
that is timely and that the SEC needs to examine ways that it can make better use of technology,
including the Internet, in the disclosure regime. Chairman Donaldson stated that “[n]o good
idea will be off the table” and expressed hope that the fund industry will be active participants
in the mutual fund disclosure reform process.
Chairman Donaldson next remarked that “[f]undamental” to the proposed reforms, and
those already approved, is ensuring that mutual fund companies comply with the reforms. To
that end, he remarked that the Commission is committed to providing assistance to chief
compliance officers, who are “the eyes and ears of the board on matters of compliance.”
Chairman Donaldson noted that the SEC views CCOs as its allies in their “parallel
mission to protect investors.” He then announced that to assist CCOs to fulfill their function,
the SEC has developed a “CCO Outreach” program to enable the Commission and its staff to
better communicate and coordinate with CCOs. This program, he noted, will feature a number
of elements. Specifically, the SEC’s examination staff will host Regional Seminars at which
CCOs can learn about the examination process and Commission resources available to them.
He next announced plans for the SEC’s first CCO National Seminar, which will feature
presentations by SEC staff. The staff also plans to issue a periodic newsletter, the “CCO
Observer,” which will serve to communicate directly with CCOs about issues of interest,
including new rules, interpretive releases, recent examination findings, and relevant
enforcement actions. In addition, the SEC will be communicating with CCOs about emerging
issues, such as e-mailing “compliance alerts” to CCOs, to inform them of matters that may
4
require urgent attention. Chairman Donaldson also revealed that the SEC has added an “Exam
Hotline” that CCOs can call if they have a complaint or a concern about an SEC examination.
Chairman Donaldson noted that CCOs continue to report to the fund’s board and that the
Commission’s program is not an effort to “deputize” CCOs as agents of the SEC.
Chairman Donaldson suggested, however, that the reforms are only “half the answer.”
He stated that the other half of the equation is the fund industry, which, he noted, “must
embrace not only the letter of the law, but also its spirit.” Quoting Mr. Stevens, Chairman
Donaldson noted that the answer to addressing the mutual fund scandals “resides in the
strength of [fund] firms’ fiduciary cultures, of [their] commitment to ethical practices, and [their
commitment] to serving the interests of fund shareholders.”
Chairman Donaldson applauded the efforts of the Independent Directors Council in
developing guidance on the implementation of the SEC’s reform rules. Specifically, he noted
that the IDC’s reports on the independent chair and board self-assessment provisions have been
particularly helpful to fund boards.
Chairman Donaldson suggested that the fund industry is defined by its “dynamism and
frequent change.” He encouraged the industry to apply its judgment to new situations as they
evolve and to always look to “identify today’s issues and prevent them from blossoming into
tomorrow’s scandals.” As an example, he pointed to how much anguish could have been
avoided if a few advisors from the legal, accounting, or management consulting professions had
told their hedge fund clients that late trading of mutual fund shares is illegal. He noted that this
sort of “common sense” advice would have been more effective in keeping the client out of
trouble than engaging in “rhetorical somersaults” to justify the client’s activities.
In closing, Chairman Donaldson acknowledged that the past 18 months have been
something of a “whirlwind” for the fund industry and the Commission. Along with the
recently enacted reforms, he noted that there is a recognition, present at all levels of the fund
industry, that the abuses and questionable practices of the past must not be repeated. He also
recognized that with “change comes anxiety” and provided assurances that the Commission
“stands ready to assist [the fund industry] during the period ahead.”
Elizabeth Krentzman
General Counsel
Latest Comment Letters:
TEST - ICI Comment Letter Opposing Sales Tax on Additional Services in Maryland
ICI Comment Letter Opposing Sales Tax on Additional Services in Maryland
ICI Response to the European Commission on the Savings and Investments Union