[17947]
September 7, 2004
TO: CLOSED-END INVESTMENT COMPANY COMMITTEE No. 35-04
INTERNATIONAL COMMITTEE No. 42-04
INVESTMENT ADVISERS COMMITTEE No. 14-04
SEC RULES COMMITTEE No. 75-04
RE: INSTITUTE DRAFT COMMENT LETTER ON SEC PROPOSAL REQUIRING HEDGE
FUND ADVISERS TO REGISTER UNDER THE INVESTMENT ADVISERS ACT
As we previously informed you,* the Securities and Exchange Commission has
published for comment a new rule and rule amendments under the Investment Advisers Act of
1940 that would require advisers to hedge funds to register with the Commission under the
Advisers Act. As a result, these advisers would be required to comply with the Advisers Act
and the rules thereunder and would be subject to inspection by Commission examiners. SEC
Commissioners Cynthia A. Glassman and Paul S. Atkins dissented from the majority’s
proposal. The Institute has prepared a draft comment letter on the Commission’s proposal,
which is attached.
Comments on the proposal must be filed with the Commission no later than
September 15, 2004. We encourage members to submit their own comment letters to the
Commission, particularly members that advise hedge funds. We ask that you provide us a
copy of any comment letters filed. Please provide your comments on the draft letter to the
undersigned by phone (202-371-5410), fax (202-326-5827), or e-mail (jheinrichs@ici.org) or to
Dorothy Donohue by phone (202-218-3563), fax (202-326-5827) or e-mail ddonohue@ici.org by
Monday, September 13th.
The most significant aspects of the draft letter are summarized below.
• The draft letter supports requiring hedge fund advisers to register with the
Commission, because registration will provide the Commission with meaningful
information about this significant and growing segment of the securities markets,
without adversely impacting the legitimate operations of hedge fund advisers. The
* See Memorandum to Closed-End Investment Company Committee No. 31-04, International Committee No. 41-04,
Investment Advisers Committee No. 11-04, and SEC Rules Committee No. 65-04, dated July 28, 2004 [17829].
2
letter also points out that registration will enable the Commission to proactively
address potentially fraudulent activities in the hedge fund industry.
• The draft letter disagrees with the dissent’s recommendation to delay Commission
action by further study of the hedge fund industry.
• The draft letter opposes, as an alternative to registration, requiring hedge fund
advisers to file notices and periodic reports with the Commission, because this
approach does not provide the Commission with examination authority.
• The draft letter notes the importance of the requirement that advisers keep records to
support their performance claims and our recognition that excepting hedge fund
advisers from this requirement is an accommodation to permit them to communicate
their performance history to clients.
• The draft letter supports the Commission’s proposal to limit the extraterritorial
application of the Advisers Act by not applying the substantive provisions of the
Advisers Act to offshore advisers to offshore funds; however, the letter urges the
Commission to monitor this exception to ensure that there are not any unintended
consequences.
• The draft letter also recommends that the Commission clarify that it will have access
to certain records of offshore advisers to offshore funds to enable it to enforce a
registered foreign adviser’s performance of its obligations to its U.S. clients and to
ensure the integrity of U.S. markets.
• The draft letter supports not requiring advisers of regulated, publicly-offered
offshore funds to register with the Commission, but urges the Commission to
interpret the exception narrowly and monitor its use so that it cannot be used by
advisers to hedge funds to avoid registering with the Commission.
• The draft letter supports permitting a hedge fund’s current investors who are not
qualified clients to retain their existing investment in that fund, and to add to their
accounts.
Jane G. Heinrichs
Assistant Counsel
Attachment (in .pdf format)
Latest Comment Letters:
TEST - ICI Comment Letter Opposing Sales Tax on Additional Services in Maryland
ICI Comment Letter Opposing Sales Tax on Additional Services in Maryland
ICI Response to the European Commission on the Savings and Investments Union