[17318]
March 30, 2004
TO: CLOSED-END INVESTMENT COMPANY COMMITTEE No. 14-04
SEC RULES COMMITTEE No. 28-04
SMALL FUNDS COMMITTEE No. 21-04
VARIABLE INSURANCE PRODUCTS ADVISORY COMMITTEE No. 3-04
RE: SEC PROPOSES AMENDMENTS TO EDGAR SYSTEM RULES TO IDENTIFY SERIES
AND CLASSES AND MANDATING ELECTRONIC FILING OF FIDELITY BONDS
AND LITIGATION MATERIALS
The Securities and Exchange Commission has proposed amendments to its rules relating
to electronic filing under Regulation S-T.1 The proposed amendments will require open-end
investment companies and insurance company separate accounts to obtain unique identifiers
for each of their series or classes (or contracts, in the case of separate accounts) and include the
identifiers in electronic filings. The series and class identifiers are intended to allow the
Commission staff and the public to search the EDGAR system for filings relating to a particular
series, class or contract. The SEC has also proposed to add several investment company filing
types to the list of filings that must be made electronically.
Comments on the proposal are due to the Commission by May 24th. If you have
comments on the Commission’s proposal that you would like to be included in a possible
Institute comment letter, please contact Greg Smith by phone at 202/326-5851 or email at
smith@ici.org by April 23rd.
A. Identification of Series, Classes and Contracts
The Proposing Release notes that many open-end investment companies are organized
as single registrants with several series or portfolios. Further, each series or portfolio may issue
multiple classes of shares. Series and classes of shares are often marketed separately without
reference to other series or classes, or to the registrant’s name. Individual contracts of insurance
company separate accounts are also marketed separately and make filings under the name of
the Investment Company Act registrant.
1 See Proposed Rule: Rulemaking for EDGAR System, SEC Release Nos. 33-8401; 34-49426; 35-27816; 39-2417; IC-26388
(March 16, 2004) (the “Proposing Release”). The Proposing Release is available from the Commission’s website at
http://www.sec.gov/rules/proposed/33-8401.htm.
2
The EDGAR System keeps records of filings on an investment company registrant basis.
However, EDGAR cannot identify the particular series, class or contract to which a filing
relates. The Commission proposes to require open-end management investment companies to
obtain unique identifiers for their series, classes and contracts and to include them in electronic
filings. The proposed identifiers will enable the Commission staff and the investing public to
search the EDGAR System and identify filings on behalf of a particular series, class or contract.
1. Series, Class and Contract Identifiers
Proposed Rule 312 under Regulation S-T will require open-end management investment
companies filing on Forms N-1A, N-3, N-4, and N-6 (“S/C Funds”) to obtain identifiers for their
series, classes and contracts and use the identifiers to indicate the series, class or contract for
which a filing is made. Under the Commission’s proposal, S/C Funds will be required to enter
their series, class and contract information into a specially created EDGAR web page.2 After
this information is entered, the Commission will provide a ten-character identifier via email.
The Proposing Release indicates that S/C Funds will have approximately six months to obtain
identifiers. After the conclusion of the six-month period, EDGAR would not accept specified
filings that do not include the identifiers.
Series, classes and contracts created after conclusion of the six-month period would
receive identifiers in response to the substantive filing that added the new series, class or
contract. For example, a newly registered open-end fund filing on Form N-1A would add its
new series and/or classes in its initial N-1A EDGAR submission template. The identifiers for
the new series and classes added via the submission template would be provided to the fund
via email notification.
2. Requirement to Include Identifiers in EDGAR Filings
If a S/C Fund failed to enter its information and receive identifiers during the six-month
period, Commission staff may require the S/C Fund to file a post-effective amendment to
generate the identifiers via the submission template. Until the S/C Fund provides the
information concerning its series and classes and is issued identifiers, it would be unable to
make other filings that require series and class identifiers.
After conclusion of the six-month period, S/C Funds will be required to use the
identifiers in all filings relating to their series, classes and contracts. Failure to include the
identifiers would mean that a filing for that series, class or contract has not been made. Filings
requiring identifiers would be suspended if the identifiers are not included in the EDGAR filing
or if they are not identifiers associated with the registrant.
The Commission requests comment on its proposal to require S/C Funds to identify in
their EDGAR submissions information relating to their series, classes and contracts. Is the
general approach reasonable? Is the proposed time period appropriate?
2 A S/C Fund that is not organized as a series company would be deemed to have one series and must obtain a series
identifier and include that identifier in its fillings.
3
B. Mandatory Electronic Filings
Currently, investment companies must submit in paper filings of fidelity bonds under
Section 17(g) and litigation material filed under Section 33 of the Investment Company Act. In
addition, those companies required to file sales literature with the SEC must submit those
filings in paper form. The Commission proposes to amend Rule 101 of Regulation S-T to make
these submissions mandatory electronic submissions.3
The Proposing Release notes that filings under Section 17(g) consist of the registrant’s
fidelity bond, and claims and settlements. Filings of litigation material under Section 33 include
a wide variety of documents including: (1) all pleadings, verdicts, or judgments filed with the
court or served in connection with such action or claim; (2) any proposed settlement,
compromise, or discontinuance of such action or claim; and (3) motions, transcripts, or other
documents filed in or issued by the court or served in connection with such action or claim as
may be requested in writing by the Commission. The Proposing Release notes that electronic
copies of these documents would be made available to the public through the EDGAR system.
The Proposing Release requests comment on the impact and feasibility of making these
filings mandatory electronic filings.
Gregory M. Smith
Director of Operations –
Compliance & Fund Accounting
3 Most investment company registrants file sales literature with the National Association of Securities Dealers, in lieu
of filing with the SEC, as permitted by Investment Company Act Rule 24b-3. The Commission is not proposing any
changes to Rule 24b-3.
Latest Comment Letters:
TEST - ICI Comment Letter Opposing Sales Tax on Additional Services in Maryland
ICI Comment Letter Opposing Sales Tax on Additional Services in Maryland
ICI Response to the European Commission on the Savings and Investments Union