[16709]
October 31, 2003
TO: COMPLIANCE ADVISORY COMMITTEE No. 92-03
INVESTMENT ADVISER MEMBERS No. 38-03
SEC RULES MEMBERS No. 147-03
SMALL FUNDS MEMBERS No. 60-03
RE: SEC AND MASSACHUSETTS FILE ENFORCEMENT ACTIONS AGAINST FUND
ADVISER AND TWO FORMER PORTFOLIO MANAGERS
The Securities and Exchange Commission and the Massachusetts Securities Division
announced the filing of federal civil charges and federal and state administrative proceedings
against an investment adviser and two former portfolio managers of the adviser. The actions
stem from allegations of market timing activity and excessive short-term trading in shares of
mutual funds advised by the adviser.
Enforcement Actions by the Commission
The Commission filed a civil action in federal court charging the two former portfolio
managers with violations of the antifraud provisions of Sections 206(1) and 206(2) of the
Investment Advisers Act of 1940.1 The complaint alleges that the managers violated these
provisions by engaging in excessive and undisclosed short-term trading for their personal
accounts in shares of mutual funds advised by the adviser, including funds in which they
participated in managing. The Commission is seeking injunctive relief, disgorgement, penalties,
and such equitable relief as the court deems appropriate.
Separately, the Commission has issued a release announcing that it has instituted
administrative proceedings against the investment adviser.2 According to the release, the
Commission’s Division of Enforcement alleges that the adviser willfully violated Sections 206(1)
and 206(2) of the Investment Advisers Act by failing to disclose to the affected mutual funds
and their boards of directors the personal trading activities of the two former portfolio
managers and similar activities by other employees. The Division further alleges that the
1 See SEC v. Justin M. Scott and Omid Kamshad, No. 03-12082 (D. Mass. Oct. 28, 2003). A copy of the complaint is
available at www.sec.gov/litigation/complaints/comp18428.htm.
2 See In the Matter of Putnam Investment Management, LLC, Release No. IA-2185, Administrative Proceeding File No. 3-
11317 (Oct. 28, 2003). A copy of the Commission’s release is available at www.sec.gov/litigation/admin/ia-
2185.htm.
2
adviser: (1) willfully violated Section 204A of the Investment Advisers Act by failing to have
policies and procedures reasonably designed to prevent the misuse of nonpublic information;
(2) willfully violated Section 17(j) of, and Rule 17j-1(c) under, the Investment Company Act of
1940 by failing to enforce adequately its code of ethics; and (3) failed to supervise the managers
and other employees under Section 203 of the Investment Advisers Act. The Division is seeking
a cease-and-desist order, disgorgement, penalties, and such other relief as the Commission
deems appropriate.
Administrative Proceeding by the Massachusetts Securities Division
The Massachusetts Securities Division has filed an administrative complaint charging
the investment adviser and the two former portfolio managers with violations of the antifraud
provisions of the Massachusetts Uniform Securities Act and regulations under that Act.3 The
complaint’s allegations as to the adviser involve the omission of material information from
mutual fund prospectuses, failure to address market timing activity in accordance with the
adviser’s stated policies, and failure to halt market timing and short-term trading by the former
portfolio managers and other holders of fund shares. The allegations as to the former portfolio
managers involve their personal trading in the mutual funds they managed. The Division is
seeking a cease-and-desist order, disgorgement, payment of an administrative fine, and such
other actions as may be in the public interest and necessary and appropriate for the protection
of Massachusetts investors.
Rachel H. Graham
Assistant Counsel
3 See In the Matter of Putnam Investment Management, Inc., Putnam Investment Management, LLC, Omid Kamshad and
Justin M. Scott (Mass. Reg. Docket No. E-2003-061, Oct. 28, 2003). A copy of the complaint is available at
www.state.ma.us/sec/sct/sctpdf/putnamcomplaint.pdf.
Latest Comment Letters:
TEST - ICI Comment Letter Opposing Sales Tax on Additional Services in Maryland
ICI Comment Letter Opposing Sales Tax on Additional Services in Maryland
ICI Response to the European Commission on the Savings and Investments Union