[16683]
October 20, 2003
TO: BOARD OF GOVERNORS No. 55-03
CLOSED-END INVESTMENT COMPANY MEMBERS No. 82-03
SEC RULES MEMBERS No. 144-03
UNIT INVESTMENT TRUST MEMBERS No. 38-03
RE: ICI COMMENT LETTER ON NASD CASH COMPENSATION DISCLOSURE
PROPOSAL
As previously indicated, NASD recently proposed amendments to Rule 2830 to require
point-of-sale disclosure of revenue sharing and differential cash compensation arrangements
relating to the sale or distribution of investment company securities.1 The Institute has filed a
comment letter with NASD on the proposal. A copy of the letter is attached and it is
summarized below.
The letter expresses support for NASD’s proposal, noting that disclosure of revenue
sharing payments along the lines NASD has proposed would help investors assess and evaluate
a broker-dealer’s recommendation to purchase fund shares and that disclosure concerning
differential cash compensation arrangements would put investors on notice that a registered
representative may have additional incentives for favoring one fund over another. The letter
makes several comments on the proposal that generally are designed to facilitate NASD
members’ compliance and to respond to questions raised by NASD. In particular, the letter:
• recommends that NASD clarify that broker-dealers may provide generic disclosure
about the types of revenue sharing payments they receive and are not required to
describe each payment by each offeror;
• recommends that NASD clarify the timing requirements for determining which revenue
sharing payments must be disclosed, when they must be disclosed, and how frequently
the disclosure must be updated;
• recommends that NASD clarify that revenue sharing payments by all offerors in
connection with the sale or distribution of funds in a single fund complex should be
aggregated for purposes of the required list and that the list identify the
1 See Institute Memorandum to Board of Governors No. 49-03, Closed-End Investment Company Members No. 74-03,
SEC Rules Members No. 126-03 and Unit Investment Trust Members No. 30-03 [16566], dated September 22, 2003.
2
sponsor/primary adviser of those funds, rather than each offeror;
• expresses agreement with NASD’s decision not to propose requiring disclosure of the
actual dollar amounts of cash compensation payments made to broker-dealer firms
because it is not necessary in order to accomplish the goals of the proposal;
• supports the concept of a de minimis threshold below which disclosure of revenue
sharing payments would not be required and suggests that this threshold be one percent
or less of the aggregate cash compensation payments received by a broker-dealer during
the relevant period;
• recommends that NASD revise the proposed requirements for when disclosure of
differential cash compensation arrangements would have to be made and indicates that
the disclosure should be required at or before the time a customer purchases shares of a
fund that is the subject of a differential cash compensation arrangement;
• opposes expanding the definition of “differential cash compensation” to include
circumstances where a registered representative receives identical payout ratios for the
sale of different funds but the sale of one results in higher compensation because the
gross dealer concession is greater in absolute dollars;
• supports the application of similar requirements to products other than investment
companies that involve revenue sharing or differential cash compensation
arrangements, as there does not appear to be any sound policy basis for singling out
investment companies; and
• recommends deleting the existing cash compensation prospectus disclosure requirement
from Rule 2830 because it would provide little additional benefit once the other elements
of NASD’s proposal are implemented and, in any event, the SEC should be solely
responsible for determining the appropriate contents of fund registration statements.
Frances M. Stadler
Deputy Senior Counsel
Note: Not all recipients receive the attachment. To obtain a copy of the attachment, please visit our members website
(http://members.ici.org) and search for memo 16683, or call the ICI Library at (202) 326-8304 and request the
attachment for memo 16683.
Attachment (in .pdf format)
Latest Comment Letters:
TEST - ICI Comment Letter Opposing Sales Tax on Additional Services in Maryland
ICI Comment Letter Opposing Sales Tax on Additional Services in Maryland
ICI Response to the European Commission on the Savings and Investments Union