[16389]
July 31, 2003
TO: ACCOUNTING/TREASURERS COMMITTEE No. 30-03
VARIABLE INSURANCE PRODUCTS ADVISORY COMMITTEE No. 5-03
RE: AICPA ISSUES PROPOSAL CLARIFYING REPORTING OF FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS
BY INSURANCE COMPANY SEPARATE ACCOUNTS
The AICPA’s Accounting Standards Executive Committee recently issued an exposure
draft of a proposed Statement of Position, Financial Highlights of Separate Accounts.1 The SOP
would amend the Investment Company Audit Guide. The proposal generally carries forward and
elevates guidance previously issued in an AICPA Technical Practice Aid.2 The proposal will be
effective for fiscal years ending after December 15, 2003.
Comments on the proposal are due to the AICPA by September 15, 2003. If there are
comments that you would like the Institute to consider in a possible comment letter, please
provide them to Greg Smith at (202) 326-5851 or smith@ici.org by August 22.
Disclosure of Ranges
Insurance company separate accounts often offer multiple products with varying fee
structures resulting in numerous accumulation unit values. The proposal indicates that if each
contract variation were treated as a separate class of shares (requiring separate financial
highlights), the volume of information presented would likely be overwhelming and detract
from the relevance and usefulness of the financial statements. The proposal allows separate
accounts with multiple accumulation unit values per subaccount to present ranges of financial
information in the financial highlights. In particular, such separate accounts may present
financial highlights for either:
1. Each contract expense level that results in a distinct net unit value and for which units
were issued and outstanding during the reporting period; or
2. The range of the lowest and highest level of expense ratio and the related total return,
and unit values during each reporting period.
1 A copy of the exposure draft is available on the AICPA’s website at:
http://www.aicpa.org/members/div/acctstd/edo/2003-_06_15-sop-amendment.asp.
2 See ICI Memo No. 14548 (March 18, 2002) describing AICPA Technical Practice Aid section 6910.11-.15 (the “TPA”).
2
The proposal indicates that the notes to the financial highlights table should state clearly that
the expense ratio considers only the expenses borne directly by the separate account and
excludes expenses incurred indirectly by the underlying funds or charged through the
redemption of units. Moreover, the disclosure should include ranges of all fees that are charged
by the separate account and whether those fees are assessed as direct reductions in unit values
or through the redemption of units.
Expense Ratio
The proposal indicates that the expense ratio should include only those expenses that
result in a direct reduction to unit values (e.g., mortality and expense charges). Charges made
directly to contract owner accounts through the redemption of units and expenses of the
underlying fund should be excluded.
Calculation of Ranges
Where the financial highlights presents ranges of financial information, the total return
and unit value information presented should correspond to the contracts having the lowest and
highest expense ratio. The proposal would also require an explanation of how the ranges of
total return and unit value information are related to the expense ratio, and why total return
and unit value for some contracts may be outside the disclosed ranges.
Investment Income Ratio
Under the proposal the investment income ratio should include dividends, other than
capital gain distributions, received from the underlying fund divided by average net assets.
The investment income ratio should exclude those expenses that result in a direct reduction in
unit values (e.g., mortality and expense charges).
Total Return
Under the proposal the total return ratio represents the total return for the period,
including changes in the underlying fund and deduction of expenses reflected in the expense
ratio. The total return ratio does not include any expenses assessed through the redemption of
units.
Gregory M. Smith
Director - Operations/Compliance
& Fund Accounting
Latest Comment Letters:
TEST - ICI Comment Letter Opposing Sales Tax on Additional Services in Maryland
ICI Comment Letter Opposing Sales Tax on Additional Services in Maryland
ICI Response to the European Commission on the Savings and Investments Union