[15821]
March 28, 2003
TO: CLOSED-END INVESTMENT COMPANY COMMITTEE No. 21-03
COMPLIANCE ADVISORY COMMITTEE No. 27-03
SEC RULES COMMITTEE No. 30-03
RE: CFTC PROPOSES REVISED AMENDMENT TO RULE 4.5 AND AFFIRMS PREVIOUS
NO-ACTION RELIEF
As we previously informed you, in October 2002, the Commodity Futures Trading
Commission (CFTC) proposed for comment an amendment to Rule 4.5 under the Commodity
Exchange Act, which provides a conditional exclusion from the definition of “commodity pool
operator” (CPO) to certain regulated entities, including registered investment companies.1 The
CFTC’s proposal also provided no-action relief, effective immediately, to allow eligible persons
to rely on the amendment to Rule 4.5, pending final action on the proposal. Based upon
comments received on its proposal, and testimony received during a recent CFTC-sponsored
roundtable on issues relating to CPOs and commodity trading advisors (CTAs), the CFTC has
withdrawn its previously proposed amendment to Rule 4.5 and published a revised proposed
amendment for comment.2 In its current release, which is summarized below, the CFTC also
affirms that eligible entities may continue to rely on the no-action relief it provided last October
pending final action on any rule amendment.
Comments on the proposal must be filed with the CFTC by May 1, 2003. If there are
issues you would like the Institute to consider addressing in its comment letter, please
contact the undersigned by Friday, April 11th by phone (202-326-5825) or e-mail
(tamara@ici.org).
The amendment the CFTC proposed to Rule 4.5 in October 2002 was intended to
address concerns with the provisions in the rule that limit the aggregate initial margin and
premiums required to establish non-hedge positions to five percent of the liquidation value of
1 See Institute Memorandum No. 15304, dated October 28, 2002. The Institute filed a letter supporting the proposed
amendments. See Institute Memorandum 15399, dated November 27, 2002. Rule 4.5 permits investment companies
and other specified entities to trade commodity futures and options thereon without having to register with the
CFTC as a CPO if they file a notice making certain representations related to their commodity trading activities.
2 See 68 Fed. Reg. 12622 (Mar. 17, 2003). The CFTC’s current release also (1) proposes amendments to Rules 4.13 and
4.14, which provide exemptions from CPO and CTA registration, to expand the availability of the relief provided by
these rules, and (2) proposes amendments to several other requirements for CPOs and CTAs. These proposals are
not discussed in this memorandum.
2
the entity’s portfolio (the “five percent test”). These concerns arose from the fact that the
margin levels for certain stock index futures and security futures products may significantly
exceed five percent of the contract value. To address these concerns, the CFTC proposed as an
alternative to the five percent test a “notional value” test, and issued no-action relief that would
permit registered investment companies and other eligible persons to take advantage
immediately of this new alternative test.
Based upon additional input the CFTC has received since its October proposal, it has
determined that, inasmuch as the persons provided relief by Rule 4.5 are “otherwise regulated,”
such persons need not be subject to any commodity interest trading criteria (i.e., neither the five
percent nor the notional value test) in order to qualify for the rule’s relief. In addition, the
CFTC believes that deleting such criteria from the rule may render obsolete the disclosure
currently required by the rule. Accordingly, the CFTC has proposed to delete the five percent
test (and the notional value test) and the disclosure requirements from Rule 4.5. As such, the
only conditions eligible institutions would be required to meet to satisfy the rule are: (1) a
prohibition against marketing a qualifying entity as a commodity pool or otherwise as a vehicle
to trade commodity interests; and (2) a requirement to submit to special calls to demonstrate
compliance with eligibility for relief under Rule 4.5.
Until such time as these amendments are adopted, however, persons relying on Rule 4.5
must continue to satisfy either the rule’s five percent test or the alternative notional value test
set forth in the CFTC’s October 2002 no-action relief.3 The CFTC’s release states that eligible
persons who have claimed or will claim such relief in the future do not need to take any
additional action to operate their qualifying entity in accordance with the notional test. Instead,
making the representations currently required by the rule, including the representation
concerning the five percent test, is all that is required. This relief will remain in effect until such
time as the CFTC takes final action on the amendment it has proposed to Rule 4.5.
Tamara K. Salmon
Senior Associate Counsel
3 In response to comments on its October 2002 proposal, the CFTC’s release clarifies certain issues regarding how and
when compliance with the notional value test is measured.
Latest Comment Letters:
TEST - ICI Comment Letter Opposing Sales Tax on Additional Services in Maryland
ICI Comment Letter Opposing Sales Tax on Additional Services in Maryland
ICI Response to the European Commission on the Savings and Investments Union