[15814]
March 26, 2003
TO: ACCOUNTING/TREASURERS COMMITTEE No. 14-03
CLOSED-END INVESTMENT COMPANY COMMITTEE No. 19-03
COMPLIANCE ADVISORY COMMITTEE No. 24-03
SEC RULES COMMITTEE No. 28-03
SMALL FUNDS COMMITTEE No. 11-03
RE: SEC PROPOSAL REGARDING CERTIFICATIONS UNDER SECTIONS 302 AND 906 OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
The Securities and Exchange Commission has issued a release proposing technical
amendments to its rules and forms under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the
Investment Company Act of 1940 related to filings of certifications under Sections 302 and 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.1 Specifically, the Commission’s proposal would require
issuers to file the certifications required by Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 as an
exhibit to the periodic reports to which they relate. The Commission’s proposal, however,
would not apply to registered management investment companies, because Item 10 of Form
N-CSR already requires them to file their Section 302 certifications as an exhibit to a report on
Form N-CSR.
The Commission’s proposal also would amend Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14
and Investment Company Act Rule 30a-2 to require issuers, including registered management
investment companies, to “furnish” their Section 906 certifications as an exhibit to the periodic
reports to which they relate.2 The proposing release points out that, unlike Section 302, which
requires the certification to be included “in” the periodic report, Section 906 requires that the
certifications “accompany” the periodic report to which they relate. In recognition of this
difference, the Commission’s proposal would require issuers to “furnish,” rather than “file,” the
Section 906 certification with the Commission.3 Thus, these certifications would not be subject
to liability under Section 18 of the Exchange Act or automatic incorporation by reference into an
issuer’s Securities Act registration statements, which are subject to liability under Section 11 of
1 Certification of Disclosure in Certain Exchange Act Reports, SEC Release Nos. 33-8212, 34-47551, and IC-25967 (March
21, 2003). The release is available on the SEC’s web site at http://www.sec.gov/rules/proposed/33-8212.htm.
2 Thus, registered management investment companies would furnish their Section 906 certifications as an exhibit to
their shareholder reports that are filed with Form N-CSR.
3 In this regard, the Commission plans to amend Item 10 of Form N-CSR to add the Section 906 certification as a
required exhibit.
2
the Securities Act (unless the issuer takes steps to include such certifications in a registration
statement).
Finally, the Commission’s proposal provides interim guidance on how issuers may
submit a Section 906 certification to the Commission, pending the adoption of final rules. The
Commission notes that, to date, issuers have employed a variety of methods to submit the
Section 906 certifications to the Commission, including: (1) submitting the statement as
non-public paper correspondence; (2) submitting the statement as non-public electronic
correspondence with the EDGAR filing of the periodic report; (3) submitting the statement
under (1) or (2) above, supplemented by an Item 9 Form 8-K report so that the statement is
publicly available; (4) submitting the statement as an exhibit to the periodic report; or
(5) submitting the statement in the text of the periodic report (typically, below the signature
block for the report). Of these methods, the Commission prefers that issuers submit the Section
906 certifications as an exhibit to the periodic reports to which they relate.
Comments on the Commission’s proposal are due on or before 45 days after publication
in the Federal Register. If there are any comments that you would like the Institute to consider
in a possible comment letter, please submit them to Barry Simmons by Friday, April 18th. Barry
may be reached by telephone at (202) 326-5923, by fax at (202) 326-582, or by email at
bsimmons@ici.org.
Barry E. Simmons
Associate Counsel
Latest Comment Letters:
TEST - ICI Comment Letter Opposing Sales Tax on Additional Services in Maryland
ICI Comment Letter Opposing Sales Tax on Additional Services in Maryland
ICI Response to the European Commission on the Savings and Investments Union