[14614]
April 5, 2002
TO: PENSION MEMBERS No. 13-02
PENSION OPERATIONS ADVISORY COMMITTEE No. 21-02
RE: DEPARTMENT OF LABOR MODIFIES ITS VOLUNTARY CORRECTION PROGRAMS
FOR RETIREMENT PLANS
The Department of Labor recently modified two of its voluntary correction programs for
employer-sponsored retirement plans: (1) the Voluntary Fiduciary Correction (“VFC”) program
established in March 2000,1 which allows plan officials to voluntarily correct certain transactions
that may give rise to a fiduciary breach and avoid possible civil investigation by DOL, and (2)
the Delinquent Filer Voluntary Compliance (“DFVC”) program,2 which provides procedures
under which plans may address noncompliance with ERISA’s reporting requirements.
VFC Program. Under the VFC program, plan officials or other parties to the transaction
in question may voluntarily correct and seek relief for violations covered by the program.
Specifically, applicants must correct the fiduciary breach, calculate and restore any losses, and
distribute supplemental benefits owed to eligible participants and beneficiaries. If the program
requirements are met, the applicant would receive a “no action” letter indicating that there will
be no further enforcement action by DOL on the corrected transaction.3
1 See Institute Memorandum to Pension Members No. 18-00 and Pension Operations Advisory Committee No. 19-00,
dated March 21, 2000.
2 See Institute Memorandum to Pension Members No. 26-95, dated May 1, 1995; Institute Memorandum to Pension
Members No. 15-01 and Pension Operations Advisory Committee No. 22-01, dated March 5, 2001.
3 The Institute submitted a comment letter making a number of recommendations regarding the interim VFC
program established in March 2000. The letter requested that the Department (1) enhance coordination with the IRS
to address Code section 4975 excise taxes and assure remedies under VFC are consistent with those acceptable under
the IRS’ voluntary correction program (EPCRS); (2) modify the program’s notice requirement; (3) coordinate relief
under VFC with the Solicitor of Labor; (4) modify VFC’s requirement relating to the provision of supporting
documentation; (5) modify and expand permissible calculation methods for determining correction amounts under
the program; (6) permit anonymous applications under VFC and expressly permit pre-application discussions with
DOL; and (7) establish a self-correction component to the program analogous to the IRS’ APRSC program (now part
of EPCRS). See Institute Memorandum to Pension Committee No. 35-00, Pension Operations Advisory Committee
No. 35-00 and Ad Hoc Committee on DOL Voluntary Correction Program, dated May 18, 2000.
2
While the general structure of the VFC program is essentially unchanged, the revised
program has been expanded in a number of respects. The revised program, among other
things:
• provides limited relief from the excise tax imposed under Code section 4975 on
prohibited transactions that may arise with regard to certain transactions covered by the
VFC program; in this regard, DOL — in the form of a class exemption from the
prohibited transaction rules — and the IRS — in the form of a notice — issued excise tax
relief with respect to a subset of transactions eligible for correction under the VFC
program4;
• eliminates the requirement that notice be provided to participants of the possible breach
and the corrective action taken (which had been required under the interim guidance) —
unless excise tax relief is sought under the class exemption issued by DOL5;
• establishes a “de minimis” exception similar to that provided in IRS Revenue Procedure
2001-176 for certain corrective distributions;
• simplifies the “documentation” requirements relating to VFC submissions by permitting
applicants to provide (1) a statement that they have a fidelity bond (rather than a copy of
the bond itself) and (2) the relevant portions of a plan document (rather than the entire
plan document);
• provides some flexibility in calculating corrective earnings by allowing the use of a
“blended” rate of return for affected participants who have not made any investment
allocations7; and
4 The four eligible transactions are (1) the failure to transmit participant contributions to a pension plan in a timely
manner; (2) the making of a loan by a plan at a fair market interest rate to a party in interest with respect to a plan; (3)
the purchase or sale of an asset (including real property) between a plan and a party in interest at fair market value;
and (4) the sale of real property to a plan by the employer and the leaseback of such property to the employer, at fair
market value and fair market rental value, respectively.
5 While the VFC program itself no longer requires notice to participants of the possible breach/correction, applicants
that seek excise tax relief must satisfy the notice requirement described in the new class exemption, under which an
applicant must provide interested persons (such as participants and beneficiaries) an objective description of the
transaction and the steps taken to correct it.
6 See Institute Memorandum to Pension Members No. 5-01, Pension Operations Advisory Committee No. 9-01 and
Ad Hoc Committee on IRS Group Correction Program, dated January 26, 2001 (providing guidance on the IRS’
EPCRS program). Thus, where correction under the VFC program requires distributions of less than $20 per
individual and the applicant demonstrates in its submission that the cost of making the distribution exceeds the cost
of correction, the applicant need not make distributions to those individuals who have separated from the plan and
who would receive less than $20 as a result of the correction.
7 Where participants have made elections, however, the applicant still would be required to calculate the actual rate
of return or use the investment with the highest rate of return among the investment alternatives available to the
participants.
3
• adds “delinquent participant contributions to insured welfare plans” and “delinquent
participant contributions to welfare plan trusts” as transactions eligible for correction
under the program.
Notably, the revised VFC program does not allow anonymous submissions and does not
provide a “self-correction” program. The DOL guidance, however, provides that members of
the public are free to contact the VFC program coordinator in each DOL regional office to
discuss on any informal, hypothetical basis general issues regarding the scope of the VFC
program, including the types of transactions appropriate for the program and the types of
correction methods that would satisfy the program. Finally, the revised VFC program is
effective April 29, 2002.
DFVC Program. The revised DVFC program incorporates several changes designed to
encourage voluntary compliance with ERISA’s reporting requirements. In particular, the
revised DVFC program reduces the civil penalty assessed on the failure to file a timely annual
report and includes a per-plan cap on civil penalties. The revised program also provides
additional flexibility with regard to the corrective annual returns required to be filed for each
plan year for which relief is sought.8
The revised program is effective as of March 28, 2002. Written comments on the
program must be received by DOL no later than May 28, 2002.
Copies of the following documents are attached for your review: (1) the revised VFC
program guidance, (2) the DOL class exemption providing excise tax relief; (3) the IRS notice
providing excise tax relief, (4) the revised DFVC program guidance, and (5) “fact sheets”
published by DOL on both the VFC and DFVC programs.
Thomas T. Kim
Associate Counsel
Note: Not all recipients receive the attachments. To obtain copies of the attachments, please visit our members
website (http://members.ici.org) and search for memo 14614, or call the ICI Library at (202) 326-8304 and request the
attachments for memo 14614.
Attachment no. 1 (in .pdf format)
8 Notably, in Notice 2002-23, the IRS stated that it will not impose penalties under section 6652(c)(1), (d), (e), and 6692
(as they relate to the filing of Form 5500) on a person who satisfies the requirements of the DVFC program.
Latest Comment Letters:
TEST - ICI Comment Letter Opposing Sales Tax on Additional Services in Maryland
ICI Comment Letter Opposing Sales Tax on Additional Services in Maryland
ICI Response to the European Commission on the Savings and Investments Union