[13809]
August 9, 2001
TO: PENSION COMMITTEE No. 54-01
RE: DOL PROPOSES INDIVIDUAL EXEMPTION FOR EXTENSIONS OF CREDIT IN
CONNECTION WITH REDEMPTIONS FROM UNITIZED FUNDS
The Department of Labor has published a proposed individual exemption for certain
extensions of credit by Riggs Bank, N.A. (the “Bank”) to participant-directed individual account
plans in order to facilitate redemptions from certain unitized funds. The proposed exemption
would provide relief from ERISA section 406(a) for (a) the extension of credit by the Bank to a
plan; and (b) the plan’s repayment of such extension of credit, plus accrued interest. Comments
concerning the proposed exemption must be submitted by September 13, 2001.
According to the summary of facts and representations supporting the proposed
exemption, the Bank provides “unitization” services to employee benefit plans, which facilitate
daily trading of plan investment options that would otherwise not be able to be traded or
settled within one day. A Unitized Fund generally consists of an investment that is not traded
on a daily basis (e.g., company stock, a guaranteed investment contract, or a plan account
managed by an investment manager) and liquid investments (e.g., money market fund shares).
Unitization services permit daily transactions by establishing “units” representing undivided
interests in all of the assets of the Unitized Fund.
When cash is required to settle transactions in units resulting from participant
withdrawals and exchanges from a Unitized Fund, the cash requirements are satisfied first from
the liquid investments, and then shares of the Unitized Fund investments may be sold to restore
the liquidity. From time to time, the Bank may be required to reject all requests for unit
redemptions for a particular business day and immediately proceed to sell assets to obtain the
necessary liquidity. Once actual liquidity is increased sufficiently, the Bank may notify the plan
recordkeeper to resubmit the redemption orders.
The Bank proposes to avoid the administrative difficulties and expense of rejecting unit
redemptions due to insufficient liquidity by offering plans the opportunity to receive short-term
cash advances from the Bank if the cash portion of a Unitized Fund is insufficient to cover unit
redemption requests on a particular business day. The notice of proposed exemption notes that
the Bank would not have any discretionary authority or control or provide any investment
advice with respect to the selection of the assets of a Unitized Fund, or provide any asset
2allocation or other services that may affect or influence participant transactions involving a
Unitized Fund.
The summary of facts and representations states that such extensions of credit and the
payment of interest by the plans could raise issues under section 406(a) of ERISA, because the
Bank is a service provider to the plans. According to the Department of Labor’s notice of
proposed exemption, a copy of which is attached, the exemption would be subject to certain
conditions, including the following:
• Each advance must be made in accordance with the terms of a written agreement
(the Agreement) that describes terms and procedures for the advances and is
approved in writing by a fiduciary of the plan that is independent of the Bank;
• Interest payable by the plan on each advance must be determined in accordance with
any objective formula or method described in the Agreement;
• The plan must repay each advance and accrued interest in accordance with the terms
of the Agreement within 10 business days after the initiation of the advance;
• The aggregate amount advanced must not exceed 25 percent of the total market
value of the Unitized Fund;
• The Agreement may be terminated at any time by the independent plan fiduciary,
subject to the plan’s repayment of any outstanding advances;
• The advances must be made on terms at least as favorable to the plan as those the
plan could obtain in an arm’s-length transaction with an unrelated party;
• Neither the Bank nor any affiliate has or exercises any discretionary authority or
control with respect to the initiation of an advance, the amount of an advance, the
interest payable on an advance, or the repayment of the advance; and
• Neither the Bank nor any affiliate is (1) a trustee of the plan (other than a
nondiscretionary trustee who does not render investment advice with respect to the
assets of the Unitized Fund), (2) a plan administrator, (3) a fiduciary who is expressly
authorized in writing to manage, acquire or dispose of on a discretionary basis any
assets of the Unitized Fund, or (4) an employer any of whose employees are covered
by the plan.
Kathy D. Ireland
Associate Counsel
Attachment
3Attachment (in .pdf format)
Latest Comment Letters:
TEST - ICI Comment Letter Opposing Sales Tax on Additional Services in Maryland
ICI Comment Letter Opposing Sales Tax on Additional Services in Maryland
ICI Response to the European Commission on the Savings and Investments Union