[13777]
July 31, 2001
TO: INTERNATIONAL COMMITTEE No. 47-01
TAX COMMITTEE No. 22-01
RE: NEW PROPOSAL BY THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN UNION ON THE
TAXATION OF SAVINGS INCOME
On July 18, 2001, the Commission of the European Union (EU) issued a new proposal for
a directive on taxation of savings income to replace the Commission’s 1998 proposal. The 1998
proposal generally was designed to provide a mechanism by which an EU member state that
taxes savings income could collect that tax when its citizens purchase savings products in
another member state. 1 After three years of intensive discussions regarding the original
proposal, the member states have agreed to take a significantly different approach to the
directive. As a result, the Commission has decided to withdraw its 1998 proposal and present a
new proposal for a directive.
Of particular significance to collective investment vehicles, the new proposal, in part,
defines reportable payments under the directive to include income derived from interest that is
distributed by a UCITS fund or an “undertaking for collective investment” established outside
the European Union, including US mutual funds sold in the European Union. For this purpose,
it is irrelevant whether the reportable income is from EU or non-EU sources, so long as the
distribution is made by a “paying agent” within the European Union. This memorandum
briefly describes the significant aspects of the new proposed directive.
Obligation of EU Member States to Exchange Information
Under the new proposal, a tax reporting obligation generally would arise whenever a
paying agent within an EU member state makes interest payments to an individual resident in
another EU member state or an individual redeems an interest-bearing security in another
member state. As proposed, the member states would be required to implement exchange of
information as soon as possible and, in any event, no later than seven years after entry into force
of the directive (“transitional period”). During the transitional period, Belgium, Luxembourg,
1 The Commission issued its original proposal for a savings directive in May 1998. The original proposal for a
directive was based on a compromise solution in which each member state had a choice between applying a
withholding tax on interest payments made to non-residents or providing information to the beneficial
owner’s member state of residence.
2and Austria would be required, in lieu of exchanging information, to withhold tax at a rate of
15% for the first three years and at rate of 20% for the remainder of the period.2 The other
member states would be required to communicate information automatically to these three
member states without requiring reciprocity during the transition period.
Scope of the Directive
The directive would apply to interest payments made within the European Union,
regardless of the jurisdiction in which the issuer of the debt is established. The scope of the
directive is limited to an interest payment made by a paying agent established in one member
state to beneficial owners who are resident in another member state. Moreover, to be covered
within the directive, the interest payments must be made to an individual or for his benefit;
interest payments made for the benefit of companies or other legal persons are excluded from
the scope of the directive.
Under the proposed directive, an “interest payment” is defined broadly to cover interest
from debt-claims of every kind, including cash deposits, corporate and government bonds, and
other similar negotiable debt securities. Interest payments also would include interest accrued
or capitalized at the sale, refund, or redemption of the debt instrument. The proposed directive
would exempt bonds and other negotiable debt securities that have been issued before March 1,
2001, from the scope of the directive during the transitional period under certain conditions.
This exemption would apply regardless of whether the paying agents are established in
member states that would levy a withholding tax or exchange information.
The Commission also proposes to include within the definition of “interest payments”
(1) income derived from interest payments distributed by funds and (2) income realized upon
the sale, refund, or redemption of shares or units in funds if they invest more than 40% of their
assets in debt instruments (or more than 15% after the transitional period).3 With this definition,
the proposed directive would apply to UCITS funds and funds established outside the
European Union that have paying agents in the European Union.
The proposed directive would provide member states the option to exclude from the
definition of “interest payment” as described above income from UCITS funds “established
within their territory” with portfolios that do not exceed 15% of investments in debt
instruments. Member states exercising this option effectively would exclude UCITS equity
funds from the coverage of the proposed directive.
2 The member states levying withholding tax must provide procedures to ensure that the beneficial owner
may request that no tax be withheld. In addition, these member states would be required to transfer 75% of
the revenue from the withholding tax to the member state of residence of the investor.
3 The percentage would be determined by reference to the investment policy of the funds and, if none exist,
by reference to the actual composition of the assets of the funds.
The directive also would apply to income distributed to UCITS funds and other non-EU funds (Tier I funds)
by other UCITS funds or non-EU funds (Tier II funds) if the income is derived from interest payments or
any income realized by the Tier I fund on the sale, refund, or redemption of shares in Tier II funds if the Tier
II funds invested more than 40% of their assets in debt.
3Paying Agent
The proposed directive specifies the minimum amount of information that a “paying
agent” would be required to report to the member state in which the agent is established. The
member states, in turn, would be required to communicate that information to the member state
in which the beneficial owner is resident.
The proposed directive would define a “paying agent” as an entity that pays interest to,
or secures the payment of interest for the immediate benefit of, the beneficial owner. Moreover,
certain EU entities (other than UCITS funds) would be considered paying agents upon receipt
of interest for or on behalf of a beneficial owner. With this definition, the Commission intends
to identify a single paying agent within a chain of intermediaries for purposes of imposing the
obligations of the directive.
Under the proposed directive, member states would be required to adopt and enforce
procedures that would allow paying agents to identify beneficial owners and their residence for
the purposes of the directive. The proposed directive would provide the minimum standards
for establishing the identity and the residence of the beneficial owner.
* * *
The proposal will be forwarded to the Council of Ministers of the European Union. In
conjunction with the discussion in the Council, the Presidency and the Commission will be
engaging in discussions with third countries (i.e., the United States, Switzerland, Liechtenstein,
Monaco, Andorra, and San Marino) to promote adoption of similar measures designed for the
exchange of information regarding the savings income of non-residents. Certain member states
also have committed to adopting the same measures in all of their territories (the Channel
Islands, Isle of Man, and the dependent or associated territories in the Caribbean). It is expected
that the Council will decide upon the adoption of the directive only once there is assurance that
third countries and member state territories will take a similar approach.
Please let us know if you have any concerns about the proposal with respect to US
mutual funds and/or UCITS funds. If you have any comments or questions regarding the
effect of the proposal on US mutual funds, please contact Deanna Flores at (202) 371-5436 or
at dflores@ici.org. If you have any comments or questions for UCITS funds, please contact
Jennifer Choi at (202) 326-5810 or at jchoi@ici.org.
Deanna J. Flores Jennifer S. Choi
Associate Counsel Assistant Counsel
Attachment
4Attachment (in .pdf format)
Latest Comment Letters:
TEST - ICI Comment Letter Opposing Sales Tax on Additional Services in Maryland
ICI Comment Letter Opposing Sales Tax on Additional Services in Maryland
ICI Response to the European Commission on the Savings and Investments Union