[13732]
July 17, 2001
TO: BOARD OF GOVERNORS No. 35-01
SEC RULES MEMBERS No. 55-01
RE: ICI LETTER TO SEC CONCERNING FREQUENCY OF MUTUAL FUND PORTFOLIO
HOLDINGS DISCLOSURE
Earlier today, the Institute filed a letter with the Securities and Exchange Commission’s
Division of Investment Management providing its views on issues related to the frequency with
which mutual funds disclose their portfolio holdings. The letter is intended to assist the staff as
it considers these issues in connection with a forthcoming rulemaking proposal designed to
improve disclosure in mutual fund shareholder reports. In addition, it responds to several
rulemaking petitions calling for the SEC to increase the frequency of mutual fund portfolio
holdings disclosure beyond the current requirement of twice a year.
The letter and a related Institute press release are attached, and the letter is summarized
below.
The letter begins by strongly urging the SEC staff to reject suggestions to increase the
frequency of mutual fund portfolio holdings disclosure. The letter states that, as a preliminary
matter, there is no compelling reason for the SEC to require more frequent disclosure. In this
regard, the letter notes that mutual fund shareholders have not indicated that they want more
frequent portfolio holdings disclosure and that, to the extent an investor does desire more
frequent disclosure, it is widely available. Attached to the letter are the results of an informal
Institute survey, which showed that mutual fund complexes disclose some or all of their funds’
holdings more frequently than semi-annually. The letter also points out that there is no
evidence that more frequent disclosure would help fund shareholders.
The letter then asserts that requiring more frequent portfolio holdings disclosure would
harm fund shareholders. It explains that a requirement for more frequent disclosure would
expand opportunities for speculators and other professional traders to exploit the information
in ways that are detrimental to fund shareholders, such as “front running” fund trades and
“free riding” on fund research and investment strategies. In support of this theory, it discusses
a recent academic study conducted by Professor Russ Wermers of the Department of Finance,
Robert H. Smith School of Business, University of Maryland at College Park. The letter notes
that the Institute retained Professor Wermers to analyze the potential effects of more frequent
portfolio holdings disclosure on mutual fund performance in order to examine in a more
2rigorous fashion the harmful effects of requiring more frequent portfolio holdings disclosure.
As discussed in the letter, Professor Wermers’ study concludes that, if more frequent portfolio
holdings disclosure were required, even with a 60-day lag, abusive activities would become
more widespread and would adversely impact fund performance. A copy of the study is
included as an attachment to the letter.
The letter also emphasizes that concerns about the adverse effects of requiring more
frequent disclosure of fund portfolio holdings on fund shareholders are not just theoretical. In a
scan of financial websites on the Internet, the Institute uncovered several examples of services
that claim to provide clients with the ability to “piggyback” off of fund research and investment
strategies. The letter notes that the gains for those who would exploit the information will come
at the direct expense of fund shareholders, a result that would appear to contravene the SEC’s
investor protection mandate. A summary of these websites is included as an attachment to the
letter.
Noting that the aforementioned services also rely in part on disclosures made by
institutional investment managers in quarterly reports on Form 13F, the letter recommends that
the SEC conduct a review of these reporting requirements to determine what modifications
(such as to the frequency of filing such reports) are needed to ensure that 13F reports achieve
their intended objectives without promoting activities that negatively impact mutual fund
shareholders.
Finally, the letter reiterates the Institute’s support for changes that would improve the
quality of information about mutual fund portfolio holdings that is provided in shareholder
reports, including streamlining the schedule of investments and requiring graphic presentations
of portfolio information.
Craig S. Tyle
General Counsel
Attachments
Note: Not all recipients receive the attachments. To obtain copies of the attachments to which this memo refers,
please call the ICI Library at (202) 326-8304 and request the attachments for memo 13732. ICI Members may retrieve
this memo and its attachments from ICINet (http://members.ici.org).
Attachment no. 1 (in .pdf format)
Latest Comment Letters:
TEST - ICI Comment Letter Opposing Sales Tax on Additional Services in Maryland
ICI Comment Letter Opposing Sales Tax on Additional Services in Maryland
ICI Response to the European Commission on the Savings and Investments Union