[13720]
July 12, 2001
TO: BOARD OF GOVERNORS No. 33-01
ACCOUNTING/TREASURERS MEMBERS No. 16-01
BANK AND TRUST ADVISORY COMMITTEE No. 9-01
CLOSED-END INVESTMENT COMPANY MEMBERS No. 23-01
INTERNATIONAL MEMBERS No. 10-01
SECURITIES OPERATIONS SUBCOMMITTEE No. 8-01
TAX MEMBERS No. 18-01
TRANSFER AGENT ADVISORY COMMITTEE No. 49-01
UNIT INVESTMENT TRUST MEMBERS No. 27-01
RE: SWITZERLAND AGREES TO REFUND TAX RECLAIMS TO REGULATED
INVESTMENT COMPANIES UNDER US-SWITZERLAND INCOME TAX TREATY
We are pleased to inform you that the Swiss Federal Tax Administration (FTA) has
agreed to begin processing tax reclaims1 filed by regulated investment companies (RICs) under
the US-Switzerland Income Tax Treaty (Treaty), payment of which has been suspended since
1998. The agreement was reached following a collective effort of the Institute and five global
custodians who jointly retained US and Swiss counsel and met twice in Switzerland with the
FTA, most recently on June 21, 2001. Certain conditions and procedures for receiving refunds
of withheld amounts were described in a letter provided by the FTA to Swiss counsel.2
The agreement applies both to reclaims filed with respect to tax withheld during
calendar years 1998 through 2001 and prospectively. If the FTA decides to modify the agreed
procedures, any such change would apply only to tax withheld after the modification is
announced.
Pursuant to the agreement, a RIC will be entitled to a full refund of all withheld
amounts if more than 95 percent of its direct shareholders are citizens or residents of the United
1 For this purpose, a “tax reclaim” represents a receivable owed to a regulated investment company (RIC) by the
Swiss tax authorities in an amount equal to the difference between the 35 percent Swiss withholding tax rate on
dividends and the lower withholding tax rate of 15 percent to which the RIC is entitled under the Treaty.
2 The FTA’s letter is being translated into English and will be distributed after the translation is complete. If you
would like to receive a copy of the FTA’s original letter, in German, please contact the Institute’s Ezella Wynn at 202
218-3560.
2States.3 If a RIC has 5 percent or more non-US direct shareholders, the RIC will be entitled to a
proportionate refund.4 These ownership percentages would be determined as of March 31, 2001
for reclaims attributable to calendar years 1998 through 2001, and each March 31 for reclaims
attributable to subsequent years (e.g., March 31, 2002 for reclaims attributable to calendar year
2002). While the Institute maintains its position that RICs are entitled to full refunds under the
Treaty because they beneficially own the income, the FTA’s letter acknowledges that the
Institute and the FTA have agreed to disagree on this point in the interest of resolving this issue.
The Institute and the global custodian group are continuing to discuss with the FTA the
precise procedures for filing RIC reclaims. The FTA has indicated, however, that they will
require a RIC to certify, to the best of its knowledge and belief, both (1) the percentage of the
RIC’s total shares held directly by investors (i.e., not through broker or other intermediary
accounts) and (2) the percentage of the RIC’s shares held by US persons, extrapolated from
shares held directly in the RIC.5 Where a RIC had no direct shareholders, the RIC could apply
for refunds, on a case-by-case basis, by providing other evidence to the FTA regarding the
percentage of the RIC’s shares held by US persons. The FTA reserves the right to audit
information provided by the RIC.
Deanna J. Flores
Associate Counsel
3 Data collected by the Institute during the discussions with the FTA indicate that essentially all RICs will satisfy this
95 percent threshold and, therefore, will receive full refunds of their Swiss tax reclaims.
4 For example, if a RIC certified that 92 percent of its direct shareholders were US citizens or residents, the RIC would
receive 92 percent of outstanding tax reclaims from Switzerland.
5 Under the agreement, the FTA will respect this extrapolation, without regard to the percentage of a RIC’s total
shares held directly by investors (e.g., whether a RIC has 1 percent or 99 percent of its shares held directly in the RIC).
Latest Comment Letters:
TEST - ICI Comment Letter Opposing Sales Tax on Additional Services in Maryland
ICI Comment Letter Opposing Sales Tax on Additional Services in Maryland
ICI Response to the European Commission on the Savings and Investments Union