- 1 -
August 23, 1989
TO: SEC RULES COMMITTEE NO. 51-89
CLOSED-END FUND COMMITTEE NO. 35-89
UNIT INVESTMENT TRUST COMMITTEE NO. 53-89
INVESTMENT ADVISERS COMMITTEE NO. 35-89
RE: SEC REPROPOSES AMENDMENTS TO RULES UNDER SECTION 16
__________________________________________________________
The SEC has reproposed for comment amendments to the rules
under Section 16 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
governing reporting and short-swing profit recovery of certain
insider transactions. The Institute filed two comment letters on
the original proposal. (See Memorandum to SEC Rules Members No.
18-89, Closed-End Fund Members No. 16-89, Investment Adviser
Members No. 22-89 and Investment Adviser Associate Members No.
21-89, dated March 15, 1989 and Memorandum to Unit Investment
Trust Members No. 24-89, dated April 20, 1989.) The revised
proposal would allow investment advisers eligible to file
ownership reports on Schedule 13G to exclude customer account
holdings in the determination of ten percent ownership status, as
suggested by the Institute in its comment letters.
A brief summary of the reproposed rules pertaining to
beneficial ownership status follows.
Determination of Insider Status
In order to determine who is a ten percent holder, the
rules under Section 13(d) of 1934 Act (voting or investment
power) would govern. The reproposal clarifies that the
"pecuniary interest test", i.e., attribution of ownership of a
security in which a person has a direct or indirect pecuniary
interest, is only to be applied once a person has already been
determined to be an insider. (Proposed Rule 16a-1)
In addition, any institution eligible to file ownership
reports on Schedule 13G, such as a registered investment adviser,
(a "13G Institution") would not be deemed to own beneficially
- 2 -
securities held in fiduciary accounts. Thus, a registered
- 3 -
investment adviser generally would not have to aggregate holdings
in affiliated investment companies and private accounts for the
purpose of determining whether it is a ten percent holder of a
class of equity securities. (Pursuant to Rule 13d-1(b)(1)(i),
only securities acquired in the ordinary course of business and
not with the purpose nor with the effect of changing or
influencing the control of the issuer can be reported on Schedule
13G.)
The SEC is requesting comment on whether the proposed rules
should be amended to require reporting by 13G Institutions if
more than ten percent of a class of equity securities is held for
the account of a single customer or "group" under Rule 13d-2.
Comment is also requested on whether a 13G Institution should be
precluded from having a single person or investment committee
make the investment decisions for each fiduciary account in order
to be exempt from the Section 16 reporting requirements.
Pecuniary Interest Test
The proposed rules would provide that an insider
beneficially owns those securities in which it has a direct or
indirect pecuniary interest, i.e., the opportunity to profit,
directly or indirectly, from a transaction in the securities.
This test is only applied if the person has already been
determined to be an insider.
The rules would provide a safe harbor for certain
management fees. A management fee would not represent an
indirect pecuniary interest in a class of securities if the fee
is based on net capital gains or portfolio appreciation for a
period of one year or more and the securities in question do not
account for more than ten percent of the portfolio. (Proposed
Rule 16a-1(a)(2)(ii)(C)) Comment is requested on whether ten
percent is a proper threshhold.
Attribution of Insider Status to Trusts
The original proposal would have attributed insider status
to any trust for which a trustee was an insider. The Institute
had requested clarification that an investment company organized
as a trust would not be deemed an insider solely due to the fact
that one or more trustees were insiders.
The revised proposed rules would not attribute insider
status to trusts with insider trustees provided the trustee is a
13G Institution that acts as a trustee in the ordinary course of
business. (Proposed Rule 16a-8(b))
- 4 -
* * *
Excerpts from the release are attached. Comments on the
proposed rules are due November 1, 1989. Please let me know what
comments you would like the Institute to make by September 28,
1989.
Craig S. Tyle
Assistant General Counsel
Attachment
Latest Comment Letters:
TEST - ICI Comment Letter Opposing Sales Tax on Additional Services in Maryland
ICI Comment Letter Opposing Sales Tax on Additional Services in Maryland
ICI Response to the European Commission on the Savings and Investments Union