[12435]
August 2, 2000
TO: PENSION MEMBERS No. 41-00
PENSION OPERATIONS ADVISORY COMMITTEE No. 59-00
RE: IRS RELEASES FINAL AND PROPOSED PLAN LOAN REGULATIONS
The Internal Revenue Service has issued final and proposed regulations regarding the tax
treatment of loans from qualified employer plans to plan participants. The final regulations adopt, with
modifications, proposed regulations published in December, 19951 and January, 1998.2 The proposed
regulations address loan repayment obligations during periods of military service and the tax treatment of
refinancing and multiple loans to participants.
Final Regulations
Section 72(p) of the Internal Revenue Code provides that an amount received as a loan from a
qualified employer plan by a participant is treated as a deemed distribution from the plan for purposes of
section 72, except where certain conditions, set forth at section 72(p)(2), are satisfied. The final
regulations clarify the statutory requirements by specifying certain terms that must be included in a loan
agreement, identifying situations in which a loan is deemed distributed, and clarifying the tax treatment of
outstanding loan amounts in the event a deemed distribution occurs.
Terms and Formation of Loan Agreement, Including Electronically. The final regulations retain the
proposed rule requirement that a loan, to avoid being treated as a deemed distribution, be evidenced by a
legally enforceable agreement either in writing or in another form approved by the IRS. The final
regulations, however, also specifically permit an electronic medium to be used for a loan agreement, as
long as standards set forth in the regulation are satisfied. See Q&A-3 of the final regulations. These
standards are identical to those set forth in recent IRS guidance for an electronically delivered consent to
a distribution under section 1.411(a)-11(f)(2).3 The final regulations also clarify that as long as a
signature is not required in order for the loan to be enforceable under applicable law, the agreement need
not be signed.
1 See Institute Memorandum to Pension Members No. 2-96, dated January 11, 1996.
2 See Institute Memorandum to Pension Members No. 2-98, dated January 12, 1998.
3 See Institute Memorandum to Pension Members No. 14-00, Pension Operations Advisory Committee No. 13-00,
Operations Committee No. 4-00, Tax Committee No. 6-00, and Transfer Agent Advisory Committee No. 10-00,
dated February 15, 2000, for a description of this IRS guidance.
2Determination of Deemed Distribution. Under the final regulations, a deemed distribution occurs at the
first time that the loan fails to satisfy the requirements for a loan agreement or loan repayment that are set
forth at Q&A-3. The regulations set forth numerous examples of when these requirements are not
satisfied. See Q&A-4; see also Q&A-10 regarding deemed distributions resulting from failure to make
loan payments.
“Cure Periods” For Payment Default. The final regulations require that repayment of a plan loan be made
in substantially level installments made not less than quarterly over the term of the loan. Under the
regulations, a plan administrator may provide a “cure period” for late payment of installments; the loan
would not be treated as in default if payments are made by the end of the cure period. The cure period,
however, may not continue beyond the last day of the calendar quarter following the quarter in which the
required installment payment is due. See Q&A-10.4
Tax Treatment of Defaulted Loans That Are Deemed Distributions. Under the final regulations, a
deemed distribution generally is treated as a distribution for tax purposes (e.g., for purposes of applying
section 72(e) rules to determine tax basis and imposing the section 72(t) tax on early distributions). The
regulations clarify, however, that a deemed distribution is not treated as an actual distribution for
purposes of the section 401 qualification requirements, the section 402 distribution provisions, the
sections 401(k)(2)(B) and 403(b)(11) distribution restrictions, or section 1.411(a)-7(d)(5) vesting
requirements. See Q&A-11 and 12.
The final regulations also adopt the proposed regulations’ rules on the noninclusion in income of
interest accruing on a loan after it is deemed to be a distribution, see Q&A –19; clarify the tax treatment
of “plan loan offset amounts,” see Q&A-13; and address the treatment of loan repayments made after the
deemed distribution of a loan, see Q&A-21.
Effective Date. The final regulations apply to plan loans made on or after January 1, 2002. However, a
plan is permitted to apply the rules relating to interest accruing after a deemed distribution, see Q&A-19,
and those relating to basis resulting from repayments after a deemed distribution, see Q&A-20, to loans
made before January 1, 2000 if specific circumstances, set forth at Q&A-22, are satisfied.
Proposed Regulations
The proposed regulations address (1) the suspension of loan repayments for periods during which
a participant is performing military service and (2) the tax treatment of refinancing and multiple loan
arrangements to a participant. With respect to military service, the proposed regulations would clarify
that, under section 414(u)(4), if a plan provides for the suspension of a participant’s obligation to repay a
loan during a period of military service, the suspension will not cause the loan to be deemed distributed,
even if the leave exceeds one year, as long as the loan repayments are resumed upon the completion of
such service.
With respect to situations in which a loan is refinanced or more than one loan is made, the
proposed regulations provide the following. First, if a loan is deemed distributed and has not been repaid,
then no payment made to the participant will be treated as a loan under section 72(p)(2) unless there is an
enforceable arrangement under which repayments will be made by payroll withholding, or the plan
4 Commentators asked the Service to clarify how to implement this cure period and requested that the final
regulations enable plan administrators to grant a participant a reasonable period of time to cure a default in loan
repayment. Although the Service rejected these requests, it has included in its examples situations which involve
cure periods.
3receives adequate security for the additional loan that is in addition to the participant’s accrued benefit
under the plan.
Second, while a loan may be refinanced and additional amounts borrowed, the requirements of
section 72(p)(2)(B) and (C), requiring that each loan be repaid in level installments not less often than
quarterly over five years, must be satisfied for each loan. Furthermore, the amount limitations of section
72(p)(2)(A) apply to the amount of the outstanding loan plus the new loan; if the limitations are exceeded,
a deemed distribution would result. However, the proposed regulations provide that if the new loan is a
refinancing in which the prior loan is repaid by the original repayment date of the prior loan, the prior
loan amount would not be considered when applying the section 72(p)(2)(A) amount limitations.
Finally, to avoid abuses of the proposed multiple loan and refinancing rules, the number of such
loans that may be made available to a participant would be limited. Specifically, a loan would be deemed
distributed if two or more loans were previously been made from the plan to the participant during the
year.
Requests For Comment
The Service requests comments on the effect of the Electronic Signatures in Global and National
Commerce Act5 on the final regulations and on any guidance needed to apply the Act to plan loan
transactions. The Service also requests comments on the proposed regulations. Comments are due by
October 31, 2000.
Russell G. Galer
Senior Counsel
Attachments
Note: Not all recipients receive the attachments. To obtain copies of the attachments to which this memo refers, please call the
ICI Library at (202) 326-8304 and request the attachments for memo 12435. ICI Members may retrieve this memo and its
attachments from ICINet (http://members.ici.org).
Attachment no. 1 (in .pdf format)
5 See Institute Memorandum to Pension Members No. 39-00, Pension Operations Advisory Committee No. 56-00,
SEC Rules Members No. 54-00, Tax Members No. 22-00 and Electronic Commerce Advisory Committee No. 5-00,
dated July 28, 2000, for a discussion of the legislation.
Latest Comment Letters:
TEST - ICI Comment Letter Opposing Sales Tax on Additional Services in Maryland
ICI Comment Letter Opposing Sales Tax on Additional Services in Maryland
ICI Response to the European Commission on the Savings and Investments Union