1 Release Nos. 34-32484, IC-24326, and IA-1856 (the Proposing Release). The Proposing Release has not been published in
the Federal Register yet, but it is available on the SEC’s web site at http://www.sec.gov/rules/proposed/34-42484.htm.
2 The distinction between customers and consumers is an important one. See the discussion of “consumer,” “customer” and
“customer relationship” in the section on definitional issues below.
[11701]
March 6, 2000
TO: INVESTMENT ADVISERS COMMITTEE No. 8-00
SEC RULES COMMITTEE No. 34-00
RE: SEC PROPOSES REGULATION S-P GOVERNING PRIVACY OF CONSUMERS'
NONPUBLIC PERSONAL INFORMATION
______________________________________________________________________________
On March 2, 2000, the Securities and Exchange Commission proposed a new regulation,
Regulation S-P, containing the privacy rules mandated by the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (the Act).1 A
copy of the Proposing Release is attached and it is summarized below.
The comment period on this proposal is extremely short, given the statutory deadline of
May 12, 2000 for the adoption of final rules. The Commission has requested that all
comments on the proposal be submitted no later than March 31, 2000.
The Institute is in the process of drafting a comment letter on this proposal. If you
would like to provide us with specific comments to consider including in our letter,
please contact me at (202) 371-5430 or rcg@ici.org or Frances Stadler at (202) 326-5822
or frances@ici.org no later than the close of business on Monday, March 13.
Background
As required by the Act, proposed Regulation S-P generally requires every broker-dealer,
investment company and investment adviser to:
(i) Provide each of its customers2 with a notice of its privacy policies and practices at the
time of establishing the customer relationship (the initial notice) and annually thereafter
(the annual notice);
(ii) Provide each of its consumers (who have not yet become customers) with an initial
notice before disclosing nonpublic personal information about that consumer to a
nonaffiliated third party;
(iii) Refrain from sharing nonpublic personal information about a consumer with a
nonaffiliated third party unless the institution has provided the consumer with an initial
3 The other federal financial regulators proposed their privacy rules in late February under the heading “Privacy of Consumer
Financial Information.” See 65 FR 8770 (Feb. 22, 2000) (joint proposal by the Federal Reserve Board, OCC, FDIC and
OTS); www.ftc.gov (FTC proposal, issued Feb. 24, 2000); and www.ncua.gov (National Credit Union Administration proposal,
issued Feb. 24, 2000).
4 See Proposing Release at n. 5 (“The examples are intended to describe ordinary situations that would comply with the
applicable rule, but the particular facts and circumstances relating to each specific situation will determine whether compliance
with an example constitutes compliance with the rule.”)
5 The proposed rules define the term “clear and conspicuous” to mean that the notice is reasonably understandable and
designed to call attention to the nature and significance of the information contained in the notice. The proposed rules do
not mandate the use of any particular technique for making the notices clear and conspicuous, but instead allow each financial
institution the flexibility to decide for itself how best to comply with this requirement.
6 Proposing Release at 22. In a letter to the SEC staff in anticipation of the privacy rule proposal, the Institute recommended
that the rules provide flexibility for any entity in a particular investment company complex to provide the required privacy
notices. See Letter from Craig S. Tyle to Robert E. Plaze dated December 21, 1999 (the Initial Recommendation Letter).
notice and an additional notice describing that practice and the consumer’s right to
prevent it (the opt out notice); and
(iv) Adopt policies and procedures reasonably designed to: (a) insure the security and
confidentiality of customer records and information; (b) protect against any anticipated
threats or hazards to the security or integrity of customer records and information; and
(c) protect against unauthorized access to or use of customer records or information that
could result in substantial harm or inconvenience to any customer.
The Act requires the federal financial regulators, including the SEC, to adopt regulations
implementing its provisions no later than May 12, 2000.3
The Use of Examples in Proposed Regulation S-P
Proposed Regulation S-P contains rules of general applicability followed by examples that
illustrate the application of the general rules. These examples differ in substance from those used by the
other federal financial regulators in their rule proposals, in an attempt to provide more meaningful
guidance to the financial institutions subject to the Commission’s jurisdiction. The examples also differ
from the other regulators’ proposals in terms of legal effect, in that compliance with the examples in
proposed Regulation S-P would not necessarily constitute compliance with the applicable rule.4 In the
other proposals, compliance with the examples would be considered a safe harbor.
The Commission has requested comment on whether including examples in the rule is useful,
and suggestions on additional or different examples that may be helpful in providing guidance as to the
applicability of the rule.
Initial and Annual Privacy Notices
Initial notices. The Act requires a financial institution to provide an initial notice of its privacy
policies and practices in two circumstances. For customers, the notice must be provided at the time of
establishing a customer relationship. For consumers who do not (or have not yet) become customers,
the notice must be provided before disclosing nonpublic personal information about the consumer to a
nonaffiliated third party.
Proposed Regulation S-P requires every financial institution to provide these notices in a manner
that is “clear and conspicuous,” that accurately reflects the institution’s privacy policies and practices,
and that is provided so that each recipient can reasonably be expected to receive actual notice.5 The
proposed rules do not prohibit two or more institutions from providing a joint initial, annual, or opt out
notice, as long as the notice is delivered in accordance with the rule and is accurate for all recipients. For
example, an investment company and a broker-dealer that distributes its shares would be permitted, but
not required, to provide a joint notice.6
7 Proposing Release at 23-24.
8 Section 502 of the Act. The examples that follow the general rule suggest several ways in which a financial institution may
provide reasonable means to opt out, including check-off boxes, reply forms, and electronic mail addresses.
3
The initial notice must be provided to the customer prior to the time that the financial
institution and the customer establish a customer relationship. The proposed rules define a customer
relationship to be established at the point at which the financial institution and the consumer enter into a
continuing relationship. For example, when a consumer purchases investment company shares (in his or
her own name) through a principal underwriter, the consumer establishes a customer relationship with
the underwriter and the investment company.7
For a consumer who has not established a customer relationship with the financial institution,
the initial notice may be provided at any point before the financial institution discloses nonpublic
personal information about that consumer to nonaffiliated third parties.
Annual notices. The Act requires a financial institution to provide notices of its privacy policies
and practices at least annually to its customers. The proposed rules implement this requirement by
requiring a clear and conspicuous notice that accurately reflects the current privacy policies and practices
to be provided at least once during any period of twelve consecutive months. The rules governing how
to provide an initial notice also apply to annual notices.
Opt Out Rights and Opt Out Notices
The Act generally prohibits a financial institution from sharing nonpublic personal information
about a consumer with a nonaffiliated third party unless the institution has provided the consumer with
(i) an initial privacy notice (as described above) and (ii) a clear and conspicuous opt out notice. The opt
out notice must inform the consumer that the institution may disclose nonpublic personal information
to nonaffiliated third parties, state that the consumer has a right to opt out, and provide the consumer
with a reasonable means by which to opt out.8 As with the initial and annual privacy notices, the opt out
notice must be provided so that each recipient can reasonably be expected to receive actual notice in
writing or, if the consumer agrees, in electronic form.
The consumer’s right to opt out is limited by several exceptions enumerated in the Act. One of
these provides an exception for the disclosure of a consumer’s nonpublic personal information to a
nonaffiliated third party for its use to perform services for, or functions on behalf of, the financial
institution, including the marketing of the financial institution’s own products or services or financial
products or services offered under a joint agreement between two or more financial institutions. In
order to avail itself of this exception, the financial institution must (i) fully disclose to the consumer that
it will provide this information to the nonaffiliated third party before the information is shared and (ii)
enter into a contract with the third party that requires the third party to maintain the confidentiality of
the information.
Several other exceptions in the Act are for disclosures made, generally speaking, in connection
with the administration, processing, servicing and sale of a consumer’s account. Proposed Regulation S-
P substantively reiterates these exceptions, making only stylistic changes to the statutory text that are
intended to make the exceptions easier to read.
Procedures to Safeguard Customer Information and Records
The Act directs the Commission (and the other federal financial regulators) to establish
appropriate standards for financial institutions relating to administrative, technical and physical
9 See Initial Recommendation Letter.
10 Conversely, investment company shareholders who are not the record owners of their shares would not be consumers of
the investment company.
11 The Institute had recommended that the Commission define the customer relationship, for fund shares sold through an
intermediary, to mean the relationship between the shareholder and the intermediary. See Initial Recommendation Letter.
4
safeguards to protect customer records and information. Proposed Regulation S-P implements this
provision by requiring every broker, dealer, investment company, and registered investment adviser to
adopt policies and procedures reasonably designed to: (i) insure the security and confidentiality of
customer records and information; (ii) protect against any anticipated threats or hazards to the security
or integrity of customer records and information; and (iii) protect against unauthorized access to or use
of customer records or information that could result in substantial harm or inconvenience to any
customer. This approach follows a suggestion made by the Institute prior to the rulemaking.9
Definitional Issues
“Consumer,” “customer” and “customer relationship.” Consistent with the Act, proposed
Regulation S-P draws a distinction between “consumers” and “customers.” The proposed rules define
“consumer” to mean an individual who obtains, from a financial institution, financial products or
services that are to be used primarily for personal, family, or household purposes. A “customer” is a
consumer who has a customer relationship with a particular financial institution.
The examples in the proposed rule make clear that an investor that purchases shares of an
investment company in his or her own name would be a customer of that investment company.10 This is
true even if the consumer purchased those shares through a broker or investment adviser. In that case,
the individual will be a customer of both the broker or investment adviser who sold the shares and the
investment company.11 Conversely, if the shares are not held in the name of the investor (e.g., if they are
held in street name or in an omnibus account) the investor would be neither a consumer nor a customer
of the investment company.
The distinction between consumer and customer determines the notices that a financial
institution must provide. If a consumer never becomes a customer, the institution is not required to
provide any notices to the consumer unless the institution intends to disclose nonpublic personal
information about that consumer to nonaffiliated third parties (outside of the exceptions as set out in
sections 248.10 and 248.11 of the proposed regulation). By contrast, if a consumer becomes a customer,
the institution must provide a copy of its privacy policy before it establishes the customer relationship
and at least annually during the continuation of the customer relationship.
“Nonpublic personal information” and “nonpublic personal financial information.” The Act
defines “nonpublic personal information” to mean “personally identifiable financial information”(which
the Act does not define) that (i) is provided by a consumer to a financial institution, (ii) results from any
transaction with the consumer or any service performed for the consumer, or (iii) is otherwise obtained
by the financial institution. “Nonpublic personal information” also includes any list, description, or
other grouping of consumers -- and “publicly available information” pertaining to them -- that is derived
using any nonpublic personal information. The proposed rules implement this provision of the Act by
restating the general categories of information described above and providing that “nonpublic personal
information” does not include publicly available information when the information is part of a list,
description, or other grouping of consumers that is derived without using personally identifiable
financial information. The definition in the proposed rules also excludes any other publicly available
information, unless the information is part of a list, description, or other grouping of consumers that is
derived using personally identifiable financial information.
12 This differs from the OCC, OTS and FDIC rule proposals, which included alternative definitions of publicly available
information and requested comment on which would be preferable. One of the alternatives is similar to the definition in
proposed Regulation S-P; the other definition would treat information as publicly available only if it was actually collected
from a public source.
5
As a general matter, the proposed rules treat any personally identifiable information as financial
if the financial institution obtains the information in connection with providing a financial product or
service to a consumer. This interpretation would cover a broad range of personal information provided
to a financial institution, including, for example, information about the consumer’s health.
“Publicly available information.” The proposed rules define “publicly available information” as
information that the financial institution reasonably believes is lawfully made available to members of the
general public from official public records, widely distributed media, or disclosures required to be made
to the general public by federal, State, or local law. The proposed rules treat information as publicly
available if it could be obtained from one of these three public sources, whether or not the institution
actually obtains the information from such a source.12
Effective Date
As proposed, new Regulation S-P would take effect on November 13, 2000, six months after
final rules are required by the Act to be adopted. The Commission has requested comment on whether
six months after adoption of final rules is sufficient to enable financial institutions to comply with the
rules.
Robert C. Grohowski
Assistant Counsel
Latest Comment Letters:
TEST - ICI Comment Letter Opposing Sales Tax on Additional Services in Maryland
ICI Comment Letter Opposing Sales Tax on Additional Services in Maryland
ICI Response to the European Commission on the Savings and Investments Union