1 See Institute memorandum to Pension Committee No. 68-99 and Pension Operations Advisory Committee No. 54-99,
dated December 1, 1999.
[11618]
February 8, 2000
TO: PENSION COMMITTEE No. 13-00
PENSION OPERATIONS ADVISORY COMMITTEE No. 11-00
AD HOC COMMITTEE ON SMALL PLAN ASSET REGULATION
RE: INSTITUTE SUBMITS COMMENT LETTER ON THE DEPARTMENT OF
LABOR'S SMALL PLAN ASSET PROPOSED REGULATIONS
______________________________________________________________________________
The Institute recently submitted a comment letter to the Department of Labor regarding its
proposed regulations on small pension plan security amendments.1 In the letter, we make two
recommendations as follows. First, “qualifying plan assets” should include assets for which registered
transfer agents maintain records. Second, the annual audit requirement should be waived for small
pension plans whose participants receive investment account statements, at least quarterly, directly from
an independent qualifying plan recordkeeper, such as a financial institution or recordkeeping entity.
Finally, in response to a Department request for comment, we opposed a requirement for small pension
plans to make available to participants and beneficiaries a schedule of plan assets similar to that required
under Form 5500 for plans with 100 or more participants.
With respect to the first recommendation, the proposed regulations do not explicitly include
investments in mutual funds in the definition of “qualifying plan assets,” nor are they necessarily
included indirectly. The definition of “qualifying plan assets” includes assets held by institutions
qualified to act as a trustee under section 408 of the Code. It is our understanding that many small
employer plans are “self-trusteed” and in such cases, mutual funds provide only investment management
and/or plan administration and recordkeeping services. In such circumstances, mutual funds generally
use an entity that is not authorized to act as a trustee under section 408, such as a registered transfer
agent, to process and record the plan’s transactional activity.
To ensure that plan assets invested in mutual funds are deemed “qualifying plan assets” for
purposes of the proposed regulations, the Institute recommended including a new paragraph for assets
for which a registered transfer agent maintains records. Further, we understand that the Department
intends to limit the institutions included in the proposed regulations to those that are regulated either by
the federal government or by the states. Because registered transfer agents are regulated by the
Securities and Exchange Commission, such entities would satisfy the Department’s regulation criterion.
With respect to the second recommendation regarding participant statements, we believe that
the Department should allow small plans whose participants and beneficiaries receive account
statements directly from a plan recordkeeper to waive the audit requirement. Specifically, we requested
that the Department clarify that this provision would be satisfied if the independent qualifying
2recordkeeper either delivers the individual account statements to participants in paper form or provides
participants with electronic access to their account information via “800” numbers, automated voice
response systems, website access and other similar technologies. In order to maintain consistency within
the regulations, we proposed that the Department define “qualifying plan recordkeeper” by referencing
the entities already included in the regulations’ definition of “qualifying plan assets,” including banks,
insurance companies, broker-dealers, those organizations authorized under section 408 of the Code to
act as trustee and registered transfer agents.
A copy of the comment letter is attached for your review. If you have any questions concerning
the letter, please call me at (202) 218-3563 or Russ Galer at (202) 326-5835.
Kathryn A. Ricard
Associate Counsel
Attachment
Latest Comment Letters:
TEST - ICI Comment Letter Opposing Sales Tax on Additional Services in Maryland
ICI Comment Letter Opposing Sales Tax on Additional Services in Maryland
ICI Response to the European Commission on the Savings and Investments Union