1 Securities Exchange Act Release No. 42208 (December 9, 1999), 64 FR 70613 (December 17, 1999) (“Release”).
[11532]
January 7, 2000
TO: EQUITY MARKETS ADVISORY COMMITTEE No. 1-00
SEC RULES COMMITTEE No. 3-00
RE: SEC ISSUES CONCEPT RELEASE ON THE REGULATION OF MARKET
INFORMATION FEES AND REVENUES
______________________________________________________________________________
The Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) has issued a concept release1 reviewing the
arrangements for disseminating “market information”, i.e., information concerning quotations for and
transactions in equity securities and options that are actively traded in the U.S. markets. In particular,
the release: describes the current arrangements for disseminating market information; sets forth the fees,
revenues, and expenses of the self-regulatory organizations (“SROs”) and the joint plans they have
formed to disseminate market information; discusses the relevant statutory standards that govern market
information fees and revenues; analyzes the financial structures of the SROs and the cost of market
information; and identifies a number of issues on which the SEC specifically is requesting comment.
The concept release states that a number of developments in the securities industry have led the
SEC to initiate its review of the arrangements currently in place for disseminating market information.
According to the SEC, each of these developments is attributable, in large part, to improved technology
for communicating and organizing information.
For example, new technology has greatly expanded the opportunity for retail investors to obtain
access to real-time market information through on-line accounts with their broker-dealers. In addition,
the structure of the securities industry has been dramatically changing, particularly due to the growth of
alternative trading systems (“ATSs”) that compete with markets operated by the SROs. The release
notes that some of these ATSs, which are operated by for-profit entities, have applied for registration or
indicated an interest in registering as exchanges and thereby becoming SROs themselves. In addition,
existing SROs are exploring the possibility of converting from membership organizations to for-profit
corporations as one means to compete more effectively.
The concept release requests comment on a number of matters being considered by the SEC.
These include: a conceptual approach to evaluating the fairness and reasonableness of fees that, among
other things, could establish a link between the cost of market information and the total amount of
market information revenues; a conceptual approach to distributing market information revenues to the
SROs that could provide for more direct funding of SRO functions that enhance the integrity and
reliability of market information; greater public disclosure concerning fees, revenues, and the SROs' use
of revenues; and broader industry and public participation in the process of setting and administering
fees.
2In formulating comments, the SEC encourages commenters to consider the four principal
objectives relating to market information set forth in Securities Exchange Act Section 11A: availability of
information; neutrality of fees; quality of information; and fair competition/equal regulation. In
addition, the SEC encourages commenters to consider the extent to which proposals are capable of
being implemented in an objective and reasonably efficient manner, particularly given the other uses to
which the SEC’s resources could be devoted.
Comments on the concept release are due to the SEC no later than March 31, 2000. If you
have any comments you would like the Institute to consider including in a possible comment letter,
please provide them to Ari Burstein by phone at (202) 371-5408, by fax at (202) 326-5839, or by e-mail
at aburstein@ici.org no later than February 18.
Ari Burstein
Assistant Counsel
Attachment
Latest Comment Letters:
TEST - ICI Comment Letter Opposing Sales Tax on Additional Services in Maryland
ICI Comment Letter Opposing Sales Tax on Additional Services in Maryland
ICI Response to the European Commission on the Savings and Investments Union