* In the Matter of Michael T. Sullivan, III, Admin. Proc. File No. 3-10122 (December 22, 1999); In the Matter of Scudder
Kemper Investments, Inc. and Gary Paul Johnson, Admin. Proc. File No. 3-10121 (December 22, 1999).
[11517]
January 6, 2000
TO: COMPLIANCE ADVISORY COMMITTEE No. 2-00
INVESTMENT ADVISER ASSOCIATE MEMBERS No. 1-00
INVESTMENT ADVISER MEMBERS No. 1-00
SEC RULES MEMBERS No. 3-00
RE: SEC SANCTIONS TRADER, INVESTMENT ADVISER AND SUPERVISOR IN
CONNECTION WITH CERTAIN DERIVATIVES TRADING
______________________________________________________________________________
The Securities and Exchange Commission recently accepted offers of settlement and imposed
sanctions in administrative proceedings against a former derivatives trader with respect to trading
activities for certain institutional accounts and against the advisory firm where he was employed and his
supervisor for failure to supervise the trader.* The trader, the investment adviser and the supervisor
consented to the entry of their respective orders, without admitting or denying their findings. Copies of
the orders are attached and are summarized below.
The order relating to the derivatives trader states that the trader had been given limited
discretion to execute a derivatives trading strategy in 20 institutional accounts, including some registered
investment companies. From July 1997 through October 1998, he executed over 100 transactions in 12
of those accounts that repeatedly exceeded internal loss limits and other limits on his discretion.
According to the order, the trader avoided detection by miscoding order tickets, forging the signatures
of the portfolio managers on order tickets and, in many cases, not submitting order tickets. His trading
activities resulted in losses of more than $16 million, and was inconsistent with portfolio managers'
presentations to several participating investment companies regarding risk levels associated with the
adviser's derivatives trading.
The Commission found that the trader willfully violated Section 34(b) of the Investment
Company Act by forging the signatures of the portfolio managers on the order tickets and therefore
causing records required to be kept under Rule 31a-1(b)(6) to be materially misleading. In addition, the
Commission concluded that the trader willfully aided and abetted and caused violations of Sections
206(1) and 206(2) of the Investment Advisers Act by causing the portfolio managers' presentations to be
false and misleading as to a material fact.
The Commission also found violations of the books and records provisions of the Investment
Company Act and the Advisers Act. Specifically, in failing to submit hundreds of order tickets for the
investment companies affected by his trading, and forging and miscoding tickets, the trader willfully
aided and abetted and caused violations of Section 31(a) of the Investment Company Act and Rule 31a-
1(b)(6) thereunder. Furthermore, the Commission concluded that the trader's failure to submit many
2order tickets and his forgery and miscoding of others caused the investment adviser to fail to maintain
an accurate memorandum of each brokerage order, and thus aided and abetted and caused the adviser's
violations of Section 204 of the Advisers Act and Rule 204-2(a)(3) thereunder.
The SEC ordered the trader to cease and desist from committing or causing any violation or any
future violation of Section 34(b) of the Investment Company Act, and from causing any violation or
future violation of Sections 204, 206(1) and 206(2) of the Advisers Act and Rule 204-2(a)(3) thereunder,
and Section 31(a) of the Investment Company Act and Rule 31a-1(b)(6) thereunder. The Commission
also barred the trader from association with any investment adviser or registered investment company
for at least five years.
The order relating to the investment adviser and the trader's supervisor states that the adviser
failed to have in place procedures reasonably designed to prevent and detect the trader's violations. The
order notes that the adviser's procedures relied on the trader to self-report without adequate
independent verification, thereby allowing the trader to circumvent the restrictions on the derivatives
trading strategy and the supervision of and controls on his activities. Accordingly, the Commission
concluded that the adviser failed reasonably to supervise the trader with a view to preventing his
violations of the cited provisions. The Commission also found that, by virtue of the trader's conduct,
the adviser willfully aided and abetted and caused violations of Section 31(a) of the Investment Company
Act and
Rule 31a-1(b)(6) thereunder, and willfully violated Section 204 of the Advisers Act and
Rule 204-2(a)(3) thereunder. The SEC censured the adviser, ordered it to cease and desist from
committing or causing any violation or future violation of Section 204 of the Advisers Act and Rule 204-
2(a)(3) thereunder and from causing any violation or future violation of Section 31(a) of the Investment
Company Act and Rule 31a-1(b)(6) thereunder, and ordered it to pay a civil penalty of $250,000.
With respect to the trader's supervisor, the order states that the supervisor failed adequately to
fulfill his responsibilities for reviewing order tickets and summary reports, thereby failing to detect
significant trading irregularities that would have been discovered through such reviews. Furthermore,
according to the order, he failed on a consistent basis to reconcile order tickets to the summary reports,
and thus was unable to determine whether the trades had been in compliance with internal limits or
whether the trader had submitted order tickets. The Commission concluded that the supervisor had
failed reasonably to supervise the trader with a view to preventing the violations described above. The
SEC
suspended the supervisor from association with any investment adviser for three months and
from acting in any supervisory capacity with any investment adviser for nine months following the
period of his suspension from association, and ordered him to pay a civil penalty of $10,000.
Kathy D. Ireland
Associate Counsel
Attachments
Note: Not all recipients receive the attachments. To obtain a copy of the attachments referred to in this Memo, please call
the ICI Library at (202) 326-8304, and ask for attachment number 11517. ICI Members may retrieve this Memo and its
attachments from ICINet (http://members.ici.org).
Latest Comment Letters:
TEST - ICI Comment Letter Opposing Sales Tax on Additional Services in Maryland
ICI Comment Letter Opposing Sales Tax on Additional Services in Maryland
ICI Response to the European Commission on the Savings and Investments Union