1 SEC Release No. 34-41479 (June 4, 1999); 64 Fed. Reg. 31667 (June 11, 1999). To briefly summarize the chronology of
events, in December 1997, the Exchange proposed amendments to its shareholder approval policy, which, among other
things, codified existing Exchange interpretation regarding “broadly-based” plans, and codified a non-exclusive safe harbor
for plans in which at least twenty percent of a company’s employees were eligible, provided that the majority of those eligible
were neither officers nor directors. The Commission approved the amendments in April, 1998, but the Exchange later
revisited them in June, 1998 and solicited comment on the definition of “broadly-based” plans. The Exchange also
established the Stockholder Approval Policy Task Force to review the comments submitted and to make recommendations
concerning possible changes to the policy. As a result, in November, 1998, the Exchange proposed amendments to the
policy to reflect the Task Force’s recommendations, and solicited further comment. The amendments approved by the
Commission in the current release are consistent with those recommendations.
1
[11084]
June 29, 1999
TO: INVESTMENT ADVISERS COMMITTEE No. 7-99
SEC RULES MEMBERS No. 44-99
RE: SEC APPROVES NYSE'S PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO ITS SHAREHOLDER
APPROVAL POLICY REGARDING STOCK OPTION PLANS
______________________________________________________________________________
The Securities and Exchange Commission has approved, on a pilot basis until September 30,
2000, the New York Stock Exchange’s (“Exchange”) proposed amendments to its shareholder approval
policy regarding stock option and similar plans. A copy of the Commission’s release is attached.1 In
summary, the amendments:
1. Modify the definition of a “broadly-based” plan as one in which, pursuant to the terms of the
plan: (a) at least a majority of the issuer’s full-time, exempt U.S. employees are eligible to
participate under the plan; and (b) at least a majority of the shares awarded under the plan (or
shares of stock underlying options awarded under the plan) during the shorter of the three-year
period commencing on the date the plan is adopted by the issuer, or the term of the plan itself,
are made to employees who are not officers or directors of the issuer. (In this regard, the
Exchange defines “officer” as it is defined in Rule 16a-1(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of
1934.)
2. Establish the definition of “broadly-based” plan as an exclusive test, rather than a safe harbor.
3. Revise the Exchange’s general policy on shareholder approval issues to recognize the increased
use of plans as a means to compensate officers and directors and state the
Exchange’s view that companies should consider submitting plans to shareholders whether or not
required by Exchange policy.
2 In addition, the Exchange has established a “Dilution Task Force” to consider a maximum overall
dilution listing standard for all non-tax qualified plans that otherwise would be exempt from shareholder
approval. (The Exchange expects to propose a dilution test to replace the revised “broadly-based” test
by the year 2000 proxy season.) The Release explains that the SEC approved the Exchange’s rule
change on a pilot basis in order to provide the Exchange time to develop a dilution test.
Barry E. Simmons
Assistant Counsel
Attachment
Note: Not all recipients receive the attachment. To obtain a copy of the attachment referred to in this Memo, please call the
ICI Library at (202) 326-8304, and ask for attachment number 11084. ICI Members may retrieve this Memo and its
attachment from ICINet (http://members.ici.org).
3
Latest Comment Letters:
TEST - ICI Comment Letter Opposing Sales Tax on Additional Services in Maryland
ICI Comment Letter Opposing Sales Tax on Additional Services in Maryland
ICI Response to the European Commission on the Savings and Investments Union